Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960

The Supreme Court examined whether directors of Jiyajirao Cotton Mills Ltd., a company that owned factories, could be held personally liable for unpaid wages under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 as amended by the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960. The Court held that the Act does not incorporate the "occupi…

Laut Kumar Verma, engaged on daily wages, applied before the Labour Court for classification as a permanent clerk, claiming that continuous service of more than six months entitled him to permanent status under Clause 2 of the Standard Standing Orders and protection of Section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act. The L…

The respondent, Manoj Shrivastava, was engaged by the M.P. Housing Board as a daily‑wage Sub‑Engineer and worked for more than 240 days. He claimed permanent status under Clause 2(i) of the Standard Standing Orders, which provides that an employee who has completed six months' satisfactory service in a clear vacancy be…

The employer (Raja Ram Maize Products) directed workmen to resume duties after a strike, but refused to let them work. The workmen filed applications under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act seeking a direction to be allowed to resume work and claim wages. The employer contended that the cause of action arose …

The Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission advertised for Presiding Officers of Labour Courts, requiring a minimum of five years' practice as an advocate under Section 8(3)(c) of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960. Because of a large number of applications for four general‑category posts, the Commissio…

Gopal, a store‑keeper‑cum‑accountant of the Madhya Pradesh Khadi and Village Industries Board, was terminated with one month’s notice. He claimed the termination was retrenchment and sought reinstatement, arguing that the Board was an "industry" under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 and that the Act’s…

The case concerned a dispute over the retirement age of employees of the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board. The Board, under Section 79(c) of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, reduced the retirement age to 58 years by a notification dated 26‑December‑2000, overturning an earlier agreement (dated 10‑June‑1996) that had…

The respondent, S.K. Yadav, a Homeopathic Assistant, was transferred after the closure of his dispensary and protested, subsequently remaining absent from duty from 10 September 1991 to 1 December 1993. A disciplinary proceeding found him guilty of two charges and imposed a penalty of reduction of pay to the minimum an…

The petitioners, electricians employed through a contractor for the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), sought to be absorbed as workmen of the corporation, arguing that the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 applied to them and that contract labour should be abolished. NTPC contended that it was a re…

R.C. Tiwari, an employee of M.P. State Co‑operative Marketing Federation Ltd., was dismissed for misconduct. He obtained a reference under the Madhya Pradesh Societies Act, which confirmed the dismissal and became final. He then approached the Labour Court under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, which set a…

Onkar Prasad Patel, a helper in the Public Health Engineering Department of Madhya Pradesh, worked continuously from 17 November 1991 and sought regularisation as a permanent employee under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, claiming six months of satisfactory service in a clear vacancy. The Labour Court allo…

Anees Khan, engaged as an assistant driver, was disengaged in July 1992 and obtained an ex parte order from the Labour Court in February 1994 directing his reinstatement with back wages. He received back wages for the period up to the order but neither reported for duty nor initiated any proceeding to enforce reinstate…

The respondent, Md. Ibrahim, was engaged on a daily‑wage basis as a driver in three separate spells between 1980 and 1983. He filed an application under Sections 61 and 62 of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 seeking classification as a permanent driver, alleging discrimination because a junior employee…

Kirloskar Brothers Ltd., the principal employer, appealed against orders that reinstated six contract labourers (Ramcharan & others) and directed Kirloskar to absorb them as employees. The labour contract with the contractor (respondent No.7) had ended and the contractor dismissed the workers. The Supreme Court examine…

The appellants, five trade‑union workmen of Shree Synthetics Ltd., were dismissed after a domestic enquiry that found them guilty of assaulting a co‑worker. They challenged the dismissal before the Labour Court under Section 61 of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960, which upheld the enquiry. The Industri…