BHUWALKA STEEL INDUS. LTD.versusBOMBAY IRON & STEEL LABOUR BO. & ANR.
2009 INSC 131817 December 2009Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the meaning of "unprotected worker" under Section 2(11) of the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969. The petitioners argued that the term should be limited to casual workers not covered by other labour statutes, relying on earlie…
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING P. LTD.versusGROCERY MARKET & SHOPS BOARD & ORS.
2016 INSC 16112 February 2016Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 and the Grocery Markets or Shops Unprotected Workers Scheme, 1970 could be applied to Pepsico India Holding Ltd., which manufactures petro‑chemical products, soft drinks and bottle…
HUSSAN MITHU MHASVADKARversusBOMBAY IRON AND STEEL LABOUR BOARD AND ANR.
2001 INSC 4327 September 2001Dismissed
Hussan Mithu Mhasvadkar, employed as an Inspector in the Bombay Iron & Steel Labour Board, was placed on probation and terminated after 21 months. He claimed that he was a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and that the Board constituted an "industry", making him entitled to the Act's protections. The La…
MAHARASHTRA RAJYA MATHADI TRANSPORT AND CENTRAL KAMGAR UNIONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1995 INSC 3161 May 1995
The dispute concerned whether Hundekaris, who act as clearing agents in vegetable markets, could be registered as "employers" under Clause 14 of the Vegetable Markets Unprotected Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 1985, made under the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers Act, 1969. Th…