Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

BHUWALKA STEEL INDUS. LTD.versusBOMBAY IRON & STEEL LABOUR BO. & ANR.

2009 INSC 131817 December 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the meaning of "unprotected worker" under Section 2(11) of the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969. The petitioners argued that the term should be limited to casual workers not covered by other labour statutes, relying on earlie

PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING P. LTD.versusGROCERY MARKET & SHOPS BOARD & ORS.

2016 INSC 16112 February 2016Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 and the Grocery Markets or Shops Unprotected Workers Scheme, 1970 could be applied to Pepsico India Holding Ltd., which manufactures petro‑chemical products, soft drinks and bottle

HUSSAN MITHU MHASVADKARversusBOMBAY IRON AND STEEL LABOUR BOARD AND ANR.

2001 INSC 4327 September 2001Dismissed

Hussan Mithu Mhasvadkar, employed as an Inspector in the Bombay Iron & Steel Labour Board, was placed on probation and terminated after 21 months. He claimed that he was a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and that the Board constituted an "industry", making him entitled to the Act's protections. The La

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search