Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Motor Vehicles Act

22 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusMRS. ASHA RAMCHANDRA AMBEDKAR AND ANR.

1994 INSC 9328 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The widowed wife of a deceased LIC employee and her son applied for employment on compassionate grounds after the employee's death. The corporation rejected the wife's claim due to her exceeding the age limit and rejected the son's claim citing a circular that barred compassionate appointments when any family member wa

SMT. PRERNA AND ANR.versusM.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERS

1993 INSC 2628 January 1993Appeal(s) allowed

Padmakar More died in a bus accident in 1978, and his father, widow, and minor daughter filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal awarded Rs 26,000, fixing the family’s monthly dependency at Rs 150 based on an unsubstantiated claim that the deceased was a drunkard,

KAN SINGH, ETC.versusSTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS, ETC.

1987 INSC 29027 October 1987Appeal(s) allowed

Three private operators whose stage‑carriage permits on an inter‑state route were about to expire applied for renewal under section 58 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Simultaneously the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation applied for fresh permits for the same route. Both sets of applications were heard together by t

B.R. SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1989 INSC 29326 September 1989Case Allowed

The Trade Fair Authority of India Employees' Union demanded housing, regularisation of casual workers and wage revision, but management failed to act, leading the Union to call a one‑day strike on 21 January 1987 after a denied request for a general body meeting. Management responded by suspending and later dismissing

COMMISSIONER, TRANSPORT-CUM-CHAIRMAN AND ORS.versusTAPAN KUMAR BISWAS

2004 INSC 48126 August 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Tapan Kumar Biswas, owned a truck whose fitness certificate was cancelled after a severe accident in January 1991. He filed an off‑road intimation for the period 1991 but failed to submit any intimation for 1992‑1995. The Taxing Officer demanded motor‑vehicle tax for those years, which the respondent co

NARCINVA V. KAMAT AND ANR. ETC.versusALFREDO ANTONIO DOE MARTINS AND ORS.

1985 INSC 10525 April 1985Appeal(s) allowed

A pick‑up van owned by a partnership firm was involved in a road accident that killed one passenger and injured another. The victims' heirs claimed compensation, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.75,000 and Rs.3,000 respectively. The insurer argued that the policy was void because the driver, a partner

RAMA BAIversusM/S AMIT MINERALS THROUGH INCHARGE OFFICER/COMPETENT OFFICER & ANRS.

2025 INSC 116224 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rama Bai, sought compensation for the death of her son in a motor vehicle accident where the driver, respondent No.1, lacked a valid licence. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.3 lakh, which the High Court enhanced to Rs.5,33,600 but held the insurer, respondent No.3, not liable, directing pay

ABDUL VAHAB ABDUL MAJID SHAIKH AND ORS.versusSTA TE OF GUJARAT

2007 INSC 45924 April 2007Dismissed

The case concerned the abduction of businessman Jayendra Mahendra Tripathi in January 1994, for which a ransom was demanded. A co‑accused, A‑9, gave a detailed confession to the police under Section 15 of the TADA Act, which was later retracted. The Supreme Court held that the confession was recorded in compliance with

N. K. V. BROS (P) LTD.versusM. KARUMAI AMMAL AND ORS. ETC.

1980 INSC 5021 March 1980Dismissed

The petitioner, N.K. V. Bros (P) Ltd., owned a stage carriage that, after nightfall, struck an over‑hanging high‑tension wire, killing eight passengers and injuring many others. The driver was tried under IPC s.304A but was acquitted on the ground that the accident was an act of God. The Accident Claims Tribunal, apply

M.C. MEHTA ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 81816 December 1997Directions issued

In M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Writ Petition (C) No.13029 of 1985), the Supreme Court issued comprehensive directions under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Vehicles Rules, 1993 to improve road safety and curb environmental pollution. The Court ordered verification of all commercial licences issued between

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. & ORS.versusBABU LAL JANGIR

2013 INSC 62416 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation retired Babu Lal Jangir compulsorily in 2002 under its standing orders after a screening committee found his service record unsatisfactory. Jangir challenged the retirement, arguing that the misconduct cited dated from 1978‑1990 was too old and that his more recent record

S. SURESHversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2009 INSC 113514 September 2009Appeal(s) allowed

S. Suresh, a 25‑year‑old lorry driver, lost his right leg below the knee in a road accident. He claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the Commissioner awarded Rs 5,20,584, finding a 100% loss of earning capacity as a driver. The insurer appealed; the Karnataka High Court reduced the award

MALIKARJUNAPPA SHIVMURTHAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS HEIRSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1995 INSC 88112 December 1995Dismissed

The appellant's truck was seized by police for non‑payment of tax under the Motor Vehicles Act. The trial court held the seizure illegal due to the officer's alleged incompetence but denied damages, citing the appellant's contributory negligence. The High Court reversed, finding the officer competent to seize and affir

BASTHI KASIM SAHEB (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusMYSORE STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.

1990 INSC 34612 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Basthi Kasim Saheb, travelling in a Mysore State Road Transport Corporation bus, was injured in an accident on 2 July 1964 when the driver failed to slow down while avoiding a bullock‑cart and entered a muddy section of the road, causing the bus to overturn. The claimant sought Rs.75,000 compensation under s.166 of the

SHIMNIT UTSCH INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusWEST BENGAL TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

2010 INSC 31312 May 2010Dismissed

The appeals concerned the validity of the West Bengal and Orissa governments' decision to cancel earlier Notices Inviting Tenders (NIT) for High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) and to issue new NITs that omitted the conditions of foreign experience and minimum turnover, which had been upheld as essential in Associa

M.C. MEHTA ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1998 INSC 37 January 1998

The Supreme Court considered a petition filed under Article 32 seeking clarification on the constitution of an Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority for the National Capital Region (NCR) under Section 3 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. The Court examined whether the earlier order of 13 Septem

NAGAR PANCHAYAT, KURWAI & ANR.versusMAHESH KUMAR SINGHAL AND ORS.

2013 INSC 5916 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Kurwai Nagar Panchayat constructed a bus stand on its own land and, invoking powers under the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, imposed a parking fee of Rs 20 per day or Rs 600 per month on vehicle owners. The fee was challenged through a writ petition, which the High Court dismissed, but a Division Bench later se

BISHWAJIT DEYversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM

2025 INSC 326 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bishwajit Dey, owned a truck that was stopped at a police checkpoint in Assam where two soap boxes containing 24.8 g of heroin were discovered. The drug was found in the vehicle but the charge‑sheet named only a third‑party occupant, Md Dimpul Ali, as the accused; the owner and driver were not alleged to

REGIONAL DIRECTOR, E.S.I. CORPN. AND ANR.versusFRANCIS DE COSTA AND ANR.

1992 INSC 1485 May 1992Matter referred to larger bench

The employee of J&P Coats was struck by his employer's lorry while riding his bicycle on a public road 1 km from the factory, fifteen minutes before his shift began. He claimed disability benefits under the Employees' State Insurance Act, arguing that the injury occurred in the course of his employment. The corporation

SMT. T.S. SHYLAJAversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. & ANR.

2014 INSC 53 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The mother of a deceased driver filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the Commissioner awarded Rs.4,48,000 as compensation. The insurer appealed, and the Karnataka High Court set aside the award, holding that the relationship between the deceased and his brother, the vehicle owner, was not satis

COMMON CAUSE"REGISTERED SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTORversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 6051 May 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ under Article 32 filed by the registered society "Common Cause" seeking relief for under‑trial prisoners and accused persons in pending criminal matters. The Court observed that prolonged pendency of criminal cases infringes the right to life and liberty guaranteed b

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search