Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
961 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The complainant, Dasadiya Mehul Ganapatlal, sought leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed under Section 378(4) CrPC and Section 419(4) BNSS. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …
The original complainant, Parmar Trikamlal Tulsidas, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the proviso to Section 372 of the …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by filing a petition under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS. The key issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could invoke the …
The complainant, Sanjaykumar Pandit, challenged the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by a Judicial Magistrate. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 378(4) CrPC and Section 419(4) BNSS seeking leave to appeal. The High Court examined …
The complainant, Abu Textiles, sought leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, arguing that as the victim he is entitled to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The accused, Nileshkumar Rameshbhai Parmar, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque and sentenced to one year imprisonment with a compensation order of Rs.7,30,000. He appealed, but the conviction was upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge. …
Ms Privi Life Sciences Pvt Ltd filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against Ms Bhagylaxmi Agro Services and others. The lower court dismissed the complaint on the ground of non‑prosecution, holding that the complainant had not filed an affidavit of …
The appellant, M/s. Jaychemie, appealed against the Metropolitan Magistrate’s order dismissing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for want of prosecution and acquitting Respondent No.1. The appellant contended that both he and his counsel had attended every …
Saurashtra Cement Ltd, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appellant argued that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, the …
Air Control and Chemical Engineering Co. Ltd., the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that the complainant …
The petitioners, originally accused under sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonoured cheque dated May 2001, filed Criminal Writ Petition No.2502 of 2009 challenging the issuance of process. The High Court had stayed the criminal proceedings in 2009 but later dismissed …
The appellant, the original complainant under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by an Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in Ahmedabad. The trial court had acquitted the accused on charges under various sections of the Indian Penal …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 5th Additional Civil Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural). The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 3rd Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mehsana. The issue was whether a complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is deemed a victim and can invoke the proviso …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused by the Judicial Magistrate. The issue was whether a complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case (Section 138 NI Act) is a victim entitled to file an appeal under the …
The original complainant, Kiritkumar Kantilal Vora, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court considered whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
Keraliya Finance, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court considered the …
Keraliya Finance, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court considered the …
Manjurabhai Sulemanbhai Gaha, the complainant, challenged the acquittal of the accused under IPC sections 504, 506(2), 114 and Gujarat Police Act sections 147(D) and 147(E) by the Trial Court. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 378 of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal. The …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under …
Divyesh Kantilal Reshamwala, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the acquittal of Snehal Kapadiya and another by invoking Section 378(4) of the CrPC. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …
Mass Financial Services Ltd., through Vijay Krushnakant Kadiya, appealed the acquittal of Gopalbhai Makwana & Anr. under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, contending that the complainant, as the victim of a cheque‑bounce offence under Section 138 of …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 378(4) of the CrPC. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial …
The appellant, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (now BNSS). The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that a complainant who is also the victim …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by filing a petition under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The appellant, Siddikbai Sikanderbhai Vohra, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined …
Vasudev Kapadiya, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of Paritosh Jariwala and another under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The Gujarat High Court referred to the …
The original complainant, Zehra Taherbhai Cyclewala, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The appellant, Dineshbhai Kanjibhai Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by a Judicial Magistrate. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and …
Mangaldas Ramjibhai Vestiyan, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused before the High Court of Gujarat under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The …
The appellant, Nitesh Balumal Teckwani, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The issue was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal …
The appellant, who was the original complainant in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court’s acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
The petitioner, Aaquil Equbal, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque and was ordered by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑VII, Patna, to pay interim compensation of 20% of the cheque amount, i.e., Rs 3 lakhs. He filed a criminal …
The original complainant, Omkar Aluminium Furniture (through its owner), appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The original complainant, F Tech Engineering Co. (partner Jigneshbhai Mansukhbhai Pambhar), appealed against the acquittal of the accused Shashi Khushiram Agrawal et al. for an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The issue was whether the complainant, as the …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
The original complainant, who filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, is entitled to file an appeal under the proviso to …
The original complainant, Kailashben Arunbhai Prajapati, appealed under Section 378 of the CrPC against the acquittal of the accused by the 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial Ltd. v. A. …
The original complainant, a victim of a cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that a …
The appellant, Dena Gujarat Gramina Bank, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case arising under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, being the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal under the …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso …
The original complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC/Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Patan. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could …
Madhu Enterprise, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Balabhai Shah & Anr in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the proviso to Section 372 of the …
Madhu Enterprise, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Balabhai Shah & Anr in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the proviso to Section 372 of the …
The original complainant, Patel Yogshbai, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure …
The appellant, Patel Yogeshbhai Bhanubhai, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the original complainant, who is also the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal …
The appellant, the original complainant under the Criminal Procedure Code and the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The key issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a …
The appellant, Gujarat State Co. Agri and Rural Development Bank Ltd, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The issue was whether the original complainant, who is also the victim of a …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd, through its representative, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by the 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd, as the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused. The appellant relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that the …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd, as the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, being the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a …
The original complainant, Prakash Pritamdas Ramnani, appealed under Section 378 of the CrPC against the acquittal of the accused by the trial court in a case involving a cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, …
The appellant, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a case involving alleged dishonour of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial v. …
The original complainant, Sunilbhai Patel, appealed against the acquittal of Babubhai Parmar by the Additional Judicial Magistrate, invoking his right as a victim under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case involving dishonour of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the Metropolitan Magistrate's order of acquittal against the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the High Court considered the …
The original complainant, Sureshbhai Lalchandani, appealed against the acquittal of Bharatbhai Balodia and another under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that a complainant in a …
Abdul Sattarbhai Yusufmiya Malek, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by filing a petition under Section 378 of the CrPC. The Gujarat High Court examined whether a complainant, deemed a victim under Section …
The appellant, Sanjay Jayprakash Tiwari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC against the acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 378 of the CrPC. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, is entitled …
The appellant, Sanjay Jayprakash Tiwari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC against the acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The key issue was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an …
The Bombay High Court considered an interim application filed by Dr. Prateek Kanakia seeking relaxation of the condition that he remain within the Court's jurisdiction after his release ordered on 24 February 2026. The petitioner argued that he needed to travel across India for business and to …
Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The Gujarat High …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modi, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court considered whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal under the proviso to …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modi, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting that the complainant, as the …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiya, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting that the complainant, as the …
The appellant, Devang Dinubhai Shah, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the Metropolitan Magistrate’s order of acquittal. He invoked Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, …
The appellant, Swami Vivekanand Credit Cooperative Society Ltd, filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court authority in Celestium …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as a victim, is entitled to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of …
The appellant, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by invoking Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, is …
Hansaben Jagdishbhai Soni, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Hiteshbhai Harshadbha Raval and another under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
Amit Baldevbhai Patel, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of Nitin Rasiklal Dave under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the proviso to Section 372 CrPC (or Section 413 …
The applicant sought leave to appeal under Section 419(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against a trial‑court order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. While the appeal was pending, the parties entered into a written consensus settlement dated 19 …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The Bombay High Court considered six writ petitions filed by Shree Swami Samarth Construction seeking to set aside orders that denied recall of the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination under Section 311 of the CrPC. The complaints, filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The appellant C.A. Consultants appealed against the acquittal of Thinking Machines Pvt. Ltd. and others by a Judicial Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The magistrate had found the respondents not guilty. The appellant’s counsel failed to appear, and the …
Meera Ravi Punjabi and Sonia Rajesh Punjabi filed writ petitions challenging the dismissal of their applications under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which sought interim compensation of 20% of the cheque amounts. The Metropolitan Magistrate had dismissed the applications, but the …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran, which held that the …
Ashokbhai Ramjibhai Maniya, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378(4) CrPC, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 …
Shree GhanShyam Textile, through Kalpesh D., appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC, but the Court considered the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial v. A. …
Baldevji Pratapji Rajput, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
Manvenrasinh Narendrasinh Sindha, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had acquitted the accused, and the appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The High …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The central issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a …
The appellant Kahan Enterprise, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
The original complainant, Kiritbhai Rameshbhai Trivedi, appealed under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by a Judicial Magistrate. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
Samirbhai Navinchandra Patel, the original complainant, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan. The issue before the Gujarat High Court was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the respondent in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that a complainant in a Section 138 case …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the …
The appellant, Pravinbhai Naginbhai Patel, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The key issue was whether the original complainant, who is also the victim of a …
The original complainant, Dharmeshbhai Dhirajbhai Patel, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The key issue …
Ashwin Babubhai Patel, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS, challenged the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial Ltd. v. …
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside the FIR and order in Criminal Case No. 176/2019. While the application was pending, the substantive case was concluded on 30 October 2025, resulting in the applicant's conviction under Section 138 of the …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
Mahendra Mithalal Chopra appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, claiming the right to file an appeal as the victim‑complainant. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held …
The Borsad Urban Co‑operative Credit Society, as the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Rajeshkumar Thakor and another under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya …
The original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed a criminal complaint, and the trial court acquitted the accused. The complainant appealed the acquittal under Section 378(4) CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the …
Maheshbhai Sadhu, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal …
The original complainant, Premjibhai Madhabhai Makvana, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, relying on …
The original complainant, Prajapati Vijaybhai, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The original complainant, Pravinbhai Naginbhai Patel, appealed against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran, which held that the complainant is …
The original complainant under Section 378(4) of the CrPC sought leave to appeal against the acquittal of accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat. The High Court considered the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot. The High Court examined whether a complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case is deemed a victim entitled to …
The Visnagar Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. (in liquidation) appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, arguing that as the complainant it is the victim and therefore entitled to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
Rajubhai Sankabhai Rabari was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, a decision affirmed by the Principal Sessions Judge. He filed a miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to …
Maheshkumar Ramanlal Shah, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. He invoked Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque of Rs.9,30,000 and appealed the conviction. Along with the appeal, the petitioner filed a C.R.M.A. seeking condonation of delay, which the trial judge allowed but imposed a condition …
M/s Avan Elastomers filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 11‑07‑2023 issued by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant claimed it had returned Rs 1,81,000 before the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 04‑11‑2022 issued in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments case. The applicant later withdrew his challenge to the warrant and only requested protection to surrender before the trial court. …
The applicant, Deepak Mishra, filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summons issued by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially a money claim and could be settled by compounding, …
Mohd Sadiq Nawab filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the summons and the criminal complaint (Case No. 24332 of 2025) filed by Mustjab under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque of Rs.10 lakh. The applicant claimed the complaint was malicious and that …
Shashwat Mishra filed a B.N.S.S. application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summons dated 15‑10‑2025 and the entire Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act proceedings pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division‑2, Kanpur. The applicant contended that the dispute …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Chauhan, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Special Judicial Magistrate-II, Kanpur Nagar, to decide a complaint (Case No. 81171 of 2021) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petition argued for an expeditious disposal of …
The petitioners sought quashing of a criminal proceeding where a magistrate had taken cognizance under IPC sections 406, 420 and 120B based on a complaint alleging non‑payment of a settlement amount arising from a matrimonial dispute. The dispute had been resolved by a mutual divorce decree and the …
The applicant, Jai Prakash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged cheating under IPC Sections 140(1), 127(2), 351(3), 352 and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had earlier granted interim anticipatory bail on 17‑03‑2026, which …
The petition filed by Radha Govind sought to set aside the Allahabad High Court’s order dated 11‑12‑2023 which had restored a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The complainant …
The applicant, Pramod Kumar Tyagi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending complaint (Case No. 1217 of 2024) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint, registered at Sadabad Police Station, …
Bhanumatiben Jagdishchandra Parmar, a 62‑year‑old widowed woman convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed a petition seeking parole for 30 days on medical grounds and to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court …
The applicant, Sonu Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 30 July 2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, and the entire proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …
The revisionist Kanhaiya Maurya filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He argued that the cheque amount had been repaid, that the opposite party had not returned the cheque, …
The applicant, Ramashray Sahu, filed an application under Section 529 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 10, Azamgarh, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 7324/2023) filed under Section …
The applicant, Anil Kapoor, filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 02‑04‑2025 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that he never issued the cheque in question because the bank had merged. The court held that the factual …
The applicant, Karmveer Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending complaint (Case No. 16186 of 2023) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint, titled Karmveer Vs. Sanjay, had been pending …
Virendra Kumar Yadav filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a magistrate's order rejecting his application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and a subsequent revision order, both of which dismissed his claim that the respondent habitually issued dishonoured …
The petitioner, Radheyshyam, was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque. He applied to the trial court for the production of a loan agreement, claiming the cheque was given as security and not to discharge a debt. Both the trial court and the revisional …
Vijay Kumar Sinha filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 18 March 2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Patna. The order had taken cognizance of offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and …
The applicant, Nazma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking a direction to the Additional Court‑II, Agra to expedite the trial of Complaint Case No. 103/2018, which involves a cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The trial …
The applicant, Pravesh Tiwari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking the expeditious disposal of his pending criminal case (Complaint Case No. 71289 of 2024) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was filed in the Additional Chief Judicial …
The applicant, Ajit Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Meerut, to conclude the pending trial of Complaint No. 2984 of 2023 (Ajit Singh v. Usha) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking expeditious disposal of a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 8296 of 2022) before the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Gorakhpur. The applicant argued that the …
The applicant, Dhirendra Pratap Chaurasiya, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expedited decision in a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 14462 of 2022) before the Civil Judge (Senior Division‑I), Gorakhpur. …
The applicant, Siddhartha Maheshwari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 75 of 2017) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was at the stage of recording evidence. The …
The applicant, Rahul Jindal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons and criminal proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by M/s Mahashay Ji and Sons. He contended that the magistrate had taken cognizance without …
The applicant Rifaqat Ali Khan filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summons dated 24‑02‑2025 and the entire proceedings of a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by the State. He contended that the dispute was essentially a monetary …
The applicant, M/s K.G.N. Enterprises, filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07‑04‑2021 and the entire criminal proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arising from Complaint No. 39787/2021. The applicant alleged malicious prosecution, …
The applicant, Ashok Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Second, Bhadohi‑Gyanpur to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 6649 of 2021) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint had been …
The applicant, Ajay Dubey, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a pending complaint (Case No. 4078 of 2024) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant argued that the case had been …
The appellant, Vishal Premnarayan Chaturvedi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh …
The appellant, Dharmeshbhai Hasmukhbhai Mehta, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referring to its earlier decision in Shivsinh …
Lakhabhai D. Kanara, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act for a cheque bounce, filed multiple criminal revision and miscellaneous applications seeking to set aside the conviction and to compound the offence. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, with the complainant …
Lakhabhai D. Kanara, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act for a cheque bounce, filed multiple criminal revision and miscellaneous applications seeking to set aside the conviction and to compound the offence. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, with the complainant …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the respondents. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to its earlier decision …
The appellant Gopalbhai Jamatani filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita against a trial court's acquittal. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. …
The appellant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. …
The appellant, Hakim Singh Churasinh Rajput, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent …
Sivaprasad Kanukuntla was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a non‑bailable warrant was issued for his surrender. He filed a revision application under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking conversion of the non‑bailable warrant …
Lakhabhai D. Kanara, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act for a cheque bounce, filed multiple criminal revision and miscellaneous applications seeking to set aside the conviction and to compound the offence. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, with the complainant …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined whether a complainant who is also a victim may file an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 BNSS or must use the …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State …
The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court referred to its …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held …
Vijay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the order dated 02.07.2025 of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a dishonoured cheque. The applicant contended …
The applicant Bhola filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order that rejected his request for an expert opinion on a Rs.5 lakh cheque alleged to be fabricated. The Magistrate had dismissed the request on the ground that the applicant's evidence under …
The applicant, Gaurav Saxena, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Complaint No. 4773 of 2021) within a stipulated period. The trial court in Aligarh had not yet …
The applicant, Ramlal Singh Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Criminal Case No. 43179 of 2023) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was pending before the Judicial …
Mansukhbhai Khimabhai Vatukiya filed a criminal revision challenging his conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the Sessions Court. The original complainant, Gulammahamad Ahmadbhai Badi, appeared before the High Court and submitted an …
Vishalbhai Ashokpuri Gosai was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque and sentenced by the 7th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, a sentence later confirmed by the Sessions Judge. The applicant filed a criminal revision application, asserting …
Patel Ramzani Yakub was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and a non‑bailable warrant was issued by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vadodara. The applicant sought conversion of the non‑bailable warrant into a bailable warrant under Sections 438 and 442 of the …
The applicants, partners of two textile firms, were charged under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 for alleged electricity theft after meters were seized during a raid. Two FIRs were filed for the same alleged offence, and the applicants sought anticipatory bail and later discharge, …
MSTC Limited, a government company, filed an application to restore its earlier leave to appeal (ST) No. 639 of 2019 and a related delay‑condonation application (No. 1410 of 2019) which had been dismissed for default on 9 January 2026. The restoration application was filed 15 days late, and the …
The appellant, Pravin Joseph Pathe & Anr., filed a criminal appeal challenging an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. A fresh notice was issued in March 2026, but when police attempted service, the appellants could not be found at the address. No party appeared …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against an acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications Nos. 12753/2019 & …
The applicant sought revision of a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant executed an affidavit confirming receipt of the …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held that a …
The appellant, Sahjanand Hareshbhai Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, citing its recent decision in …
The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shivsinh …
The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to its recent decision …
The appellant, Bharatsang Bhagwansang Jadeja, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed to the High Court under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against an acquittal by the trial court. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The appellant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The appellant, Gujarat State Co‑operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd., filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court …
The appellant, Sureshkumar Prabhuram Thakkar, filed an appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined a recent precedent (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, citing its recent decision in …
