Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
10 judgments · newest first · showing 1–10
The High Court considered an interim application filed by Sara Ismail Aadam, who had been released on bail for offences under the NDPS Act, Passport Act and Foreigners Act. The applicant was unable to furnish the required surety within the time stipulated in the original bail order dated 12-12-2025. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS by Harshvardhan Jain, who was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 319, 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 341(1) of the BNS, relating to operating an illegal "embassy" and possession of forged diplomatic …
The applicant, Sami Ali Khan, was charged under Sections 302, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC for the daylight murder of an eye surgeon, with the FIR assigning him the role of firing. He has been in custody since May 2021, amounting to about four and a half years, and filed a second bail application after …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Chhojer Bharchin (alias Chanjan, Chocho, Chandra) who was in custody for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and …
The case involved a protracted matrimonial dispute between Dr. Benoy Idicula Babu and Dr. Nisha Saira Benoy, with multiple civil, criminal and passport matters pending in various courts. The Supreme Court, after directing court‑assisted mediation, facilitated a settlement and considered the parties’ …
The Supreme Court examined appeals by the CBI challenging the Delhi High Court’s grant of bail to Abhishek Verma, who was charged under Sections 3 and 9 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 and Sections 409/109 read with 120‑B of the IPC for allegedly receiving classified defence information via pen …
The case concerned the abduction of businessman Jayendra Mahendra Tripathi in January 1994, for which a ransom was demanded. A co‑accused, A‑9, gave a detailed confession to the police under Section 15 of the TADA Act, which was later retracted. The Supreme Court held that the confession was …
The Supreme Court examined two sets of review petitions filed under Article 137 and Order XL of the Supreme Court Rules: one by four convicts sentenced to death for offences under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and the Indian Penal Code, and another by the State …
In the General Vaidya murder case two accused were convicted of murder and sentenced to death. The convicts did not appeal, and the Supreme Court was hearing a reference for confirmation of the death sentence. Simranjit Singh Mann, President of a political party, filed a writ petition under Article …
The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Sukhdev Singh (Accused No.1) and Harjinder Singh Jinda (Accused No.5) for the murder of retired General Vaidya under the IPC and TADA. The trial court convicted both of murder (IPC ss.302, 307, 34) and sentenced them to death, relying on eyewitness identification, …
