Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

VAISHNORANI MAHILA BACHAT GATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2019 INSC 27826 February 2019Disposed off

The petitioners challenged a 2016 Maharashtra tender for supplying ready‑to‑cook food to Anganwadi centres, alleging that the tender’s conditions – mandatory use of extrusion technology, a turnover threshold of Rs 1 crore and requirement of automated production units – were arbitrary and excluded Mahila Mandals and sel

R.R. PAREKHversusHLGH COURT OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2016 INSC 51312 July 2016Case Partly allowed

The case concerned a senior judicial officer, R.R. Parekh, who was dismissed from service after two disciplinary inquiries found him guilty of misconduct for awarding sentences below the statutory minimum under Section 135 of the Customs Act, allegedly motivated by corrupt or oblique motives. The High Court had revisit

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search