Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

VED MITIER GILLversusUNION TERRITORY ADMINISTRATION, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 26426 March 2015Dismissed

The case concerned the dismissal of Deputy Superintendent Ved Mitter Gill and four other jail officials after four under‑trial terrorists escaped from Model Jail, Burail, Chandigarh through a 94‑foot tunnel. The authorities invoked clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution to dispense with

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.versusSWARAN SINGH

1997 INSC 5924 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab initiated disciplinary proceedings against Swarans Singh, who retired before the proceedings concluded. The disciplinary authority found misconduct and imposed a minor penalty, but the appellate authority on review imposed a 15% reduction in his pension. Singh filed a civil suit challenging the pens

JOGINDER PAL & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2014 INSC 40823 May 2014Case Partly allowed

The Punjab Public Service Commission’s chairman was found to have taken bribes and manipulated the recruitment of executive, allied services and judicial officers between 1998‑2002. Consequently, the State terminated the services of all appointed officers. The High Court upheld the termination, treating the entire sele

INDERPREET SINGH KAHLON AND ORS.versusSTA TE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2006 INSC 2883 May 2006Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the termination of over 150 civil and judicial officers appointed by the Punjab Public Service Commission during the tenure of its chairman, who was alleged to have taken bribes and corrupted the selection process. The appellants argued that their services were dismissed without due process,

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search