Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, 1961

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

LUDHIANA CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusAMRIK SINGH AND ORS.

2003 INSC 40719 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The Ludhiana Central Co‑operative Bank invited applications for junior clerk/typist posts and, after conducting tests, prepared a merit list. The Registrar of Co‑operative Societies ordered a freeze on all appointments due to state elections, and the new government later banned all recruitments. Despite these directive

NISHA SINGLAversusADARSH COLONY COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

2019 INSC 53516 April 2019Disposed off

The appellant, a founder member of Adarsh Colony Cooperative House Building Society, deposited monies between 1975 and 1982 for a residential plot. Although an administrator allotted her a 250‑sq‑yard plot (No. 41‑D) in 1983, the allotment was later cancelled and the plot was allegedly re‑allotted to another member. Th

NIRMAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1984 INSC 1359 August 1984Appeal(s) allowed

Nirmal Singh, a Branch Manager of a cooperative bank, was dismissed after an inquiry into a fraudulent draft encashment. He challenged his dismissal, and the Government of Punjab referred his grievance to the Conciliation Officer, who recommended that the dispute be referred to a Labour Court. The Punjab Labour Commiss

HARKISHAN DASS AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 7028 November 1995Disposed off

A cooperative society discovered that its cashier‑cum‑member had misappropriated large sums of money after his death. The society initiated arbitration under Sections 55 and 56 of the Punjab Co‑operative Societies Act, 1961, and an award was made against the deceased's heirs and legal representatives for the principal,

MORINDA COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD.versusMORINDA COOP. SUGAR MILLS WORKERS UNION

2006 INSC 3782 July 2006Dismissed

The Morinda Co‑op. Sugar Mills Workers Union filed a suit seeking a declaration that its members were entitled to a variable dearness allowance (VOA) under para 317(ii) of the Third Wage Board Report and an injunction restraining the mill from withdrawing the allowance. The mill contended that the suit was not maintain

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search