Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

AMARJIT SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2010 INSC 65629 September 2010Dismissed

The case concerned the expansion of the SAS (Nagar) Mohali township, where land for sectors 81, 88 and 89 was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State of Punjab invoked Section 178(2) of the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 to exempt the acquired land from the provisions of Se

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusABHISHEK GUPTA ETC.

2024 INSC 79621 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) sought to acquire 952.18 acres of land in Panchkula for a mixed‑use development, but the landowners objected under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, claiming exemption for fruit trees and alleging that their structures were authorized. The High Court quashed th

SURINDER SINGH BRAR AND OTHERS ETC.ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 46311 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the acquisition of about 105 acres of land in Manimajra, Chandigarh for the expansion of the Rajiv Gandhi Technology Park (Phase III). The acquisition was approved by the Adviser to the Administrator of the Union Territory based on reports of the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO), which the petitioners

TATA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTDversusAALOK JAGGA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 12035 November 2019Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined Tata Housing Development Co.'s attempt to construct a high‑rise housing project (CAMELOT) on 52.66 acres in Mohali, Punjab, which lay within 123 metres of the Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary and inside the catchment area of Sukhna Lake. The appellants argued that the environmental clearance granted

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusSANJEET SINGH GREWAL AND ORS.

2007 INSC 7243 July 2007Dismissed

The Punjab Government issued notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act to acquire 9,354 acres for the proposed new town of Anandgarh. Writ petitions challenged the acquisition, arguing that the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 required the Board constituted under Section 3 to

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search