Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusN.V. PHANNENDRAN

1995 INSC 51229 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

N.V. Phannendran, a travelling ticket examiner, was removed from service by the Divisional Railway Manager (DRM). He challenged the removal before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), arguing that the DRM, not being the appointing authority, lacked competence to impose removal under the Railway Servants (Discipli

SOUTHERN RAILWAY OFFICERS ASSN. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2009 INSC 10114 August 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose when a group of railway employees assaulted a senior officer who was about to board a train after superannuation, threatening his life and creating a violent scene at the station. The disciplinary authority, invoking Rule 14(ii) of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 and clause (b) o

ISHWAR CHANDRA JAYASWALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 63 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Ishwar Chandra Jayaswal, a 75‑year‑old railway employee with 23 years of service, was charged with demanding and accepting small sums (Rs 26, Rs 34 and Rs 18) for issuing Fit Certificates to fellow railway staff. A departmental inquiry proved two of the three charges and the disciplinary authority removed him from serv

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search