Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DINESH KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERSversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF RAJASTHAN OTHERS

2020 INSC 37629 April 2020Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined multiple writ petitions challenging the seniority and appointment of judicial officers in Rajasthan's District Judge cadre after the 2010 Judicial Service Rules came into force. The petitioners argued that officers promoted ad‑hoc to Fast Track Courts should retain seniority from their initia

PINKY MEENAversusTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR & ANR.

2025 INSC 75621 May 2025

Pinky Meena, a former Government Teacher, applied for and was selected as a Civil Judge in the Rajasthan Judicial Service. After resigning from her teaching post, she completed her probationary training but was later served a show‑cause notice and discharged on allegations of simultaneously obtaining LL.B. and B.Ed. de

SAKSHI ARHAversusTHE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 55918 May 2023Matter referred to larger bench

The appellants, members of OBC‑NCL, MBC‑NCL and EWS, applied for the post of Civil Judge under a Rajasthan High Court advertisement dated 22 July 2021 and scored higher marks in their reserved categories, but their caste or income certificates were issued after the last date of application (31 August 2021). The Rajasth

ABHAY JAINversusTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AND ANR

2022 INSC 30915 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a judicial officer appointed in 2013, granted bail on 27 April 2015 in a corruption case, which led to a departmental enquiry alleging misconduct and extraneous motives. While the enquiry was pending, a Higher Judicial Committee recommended his discharge and a Full Court ordered his termination on ground

SAKSHI ARHAversusTHE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.

2025 INSC 4638 April 2025Dismissed

The Rajasthan High Court advertised recruitment for Civil Judges in 2021, requiring candidates to submit caste certificates but without specifying a cut‑off date for their issuance. After the preliminary and mains exams, several OBC‑NCL, MBC‑NCL and EWS candidates were excluded from the interview list because their cer

IN RE: RECRUITMENT OF VISUALLY IMPAIRED IN JUDICIAL SERVICES versus

2025 INSC 3002 March 2025Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether visually impaired candidates are suitable for judicial service and whether recent amendments to the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules (Rule 6A and the proviso to Rule 7) violated constitutional equality and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Court held that vis

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search