Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Registration of Electors Rules, 1960

11 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

INDRAJIT BARIJA & ORS. ETC.versusELECTION COMMLSSION OF INDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 21030 September 1985Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the 1983 Assam Legislative Assembly election, alleging that the electoral rolls of 1979 were defective because they had not been revised as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and allegedly contained non‑citizens. They filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitut

LAKSHMI CHARAN SEN AND ORS ETC.versusA.K.M. HASSAN UZZAMAN AMO ORS. ETC.

1982 INSC 4330 March 1982Disposed off

The Calcutta High Court entertained a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Chief Election Commissioner, the Chief Electoral Officer and the Election Commission of India for allegedly issuing vague and arbitrary directions for a de novo revision of West Bengal's electoral rolls and for proceeding with electio

P.T RAJANversusT.P.M. SAHIR AND ORS.

2003 INSC 51426 September 2003Dismissed

In the 2001 Kozhikode Assembly election, the appellant, election agent of the defeated candidate, alleged that after the 3 p.m. deadline for filing nominations, 19,045 names were deleted and 6,828 added to the electoral roll, rendering the election void. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the appellant

RAM DEO BHANDARI AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 4217 January 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered writ petitions filed under Article 32 challenging a press note issued by the Election Commission that elections in Bihar and Orissa would not be held unless photo identity cards were supplied to all eligible voters. The Commission had earlier directed states, under Rule 28 of the Registrati

LAXMI KANT BAJPAIversusHAZI YAQOOB & ORS.

2009 INSC 131015 December 2009Dismissed

The appellant, Laxmi Kant Bajpai, challenged the election of Hazi Yaqoob to the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly on the ground that votes from 21 localities, allegedly outside the delimitation order, were improperly included in the electoral roll, violating Sections 100(1)(d)(iii) and (iv) of the Representation of th

JAGANNATH RAMCHANDRA NUNEKARversusGENU GOVIND KADAM & OTHERS

1988 INSC 27714 September 1988Case Allowed

Jagannath Ramchandra Nunekar, an elector from Shivaji Nagar, sought to contest a bye‑election in Jaoli and applied for a certified copy of his entry in the Shivaji Nagar electoral roll. He received a copy on 8 January 1986 showing the latest publication date as 31‑Jan‑1984 and filed his nomination on 9 January, but the

KAMAL NATHversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 96812 October 2018Dismissed

Kam​al Nath, President of the Madhya Pradesh Congress Committee, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking (i) VVPAT verification at 10% of polling stations and (ii) that the Election Commission of India (ECI) publish the draft electoral roll in a searchable PDF (text‑searchable) format. The petitioner relied on C

B. DANDAPANI PATRAversusRETURNING OFFICER-CUM-SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BERHAMPUR AND OTHERS

1989 INSC 3388 November 1989Dismissed

The appellant, a candidate for the Orissa Legislative Assembly, filed his nomination from Gopalpur while being an elector in Sorada. He submitted an attested copy of the Sorada electoral roll as it existed on 21 July 1983, arguing that this satisfied the requirement of Section 33(5) of the Representation of the People

ARSHAD JAMILversusSTATE OF UTIARAKHAND & ORS.

2011 INSC 6607 September 2011Disposed off

Arshad Jamil, a civil judge appointed to a reserved OBC post in Uttarakhand, obtained a caste certificate claiming ordinary residence in Roorkee. Evidence showed he was a permanent resident of Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, with electoral rolls, ration card, and bar enrollment supporting this. The Tehsildar cancelled th

LAL BABU HUSSEIN AND ORS.versusELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER AND ORS.

1995 INSC 986 February 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the Election Commission's directives that empowered district collectors and police to determine a person's citizenship and delete alleged foreign nationals from electoral rolls. Petitioners challenged the procedure, arguing that notices relied solely on police reports, limited the documents t

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusDR. MANMOHAN SINGH AND ORS.

1999 INSC 5371 December 1999Dismissed

Dr. Manmohan Singh, then a Union Cabinet Minister, filed Form No.1 under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 stating that but for his office he would be ordinarily resident in the Dispur Assembly constituency of Assam. The Election Commission questioned this declaration, initiated an enquiry and the Chief Election

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search