Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Amendment) Act, 1976

12 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusMILIND AND ORS.

2000 INSC 54328 November 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra challenged the admission of Milind, who had obtained a caste certificate claiming he belonged to the Halba Scheduled Tribe, on the ground that he was actually a member of the Koshti caste. The High Court had held that a sub‑tribe enquiry was permissible and that Halba‑Koshti could be treated as

PRABHUDEV MALLIKARJUNAIAHversusRAMACHANDRA VEERAPPA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 57023 April 1996Dismissed

The appellant, Prabhudev Mallikarjunaiah, filed a nomination as a Scheduled Caste (Beda Jangamma) candidate for the Bidar‑1 (SC) Lok Sabha seat in 1991. The Returning Officer rejected his nomination, holding that he belonged to the Veerashiva Lingayath community, not the Beda Jangamma caste listed in Presidential Notif

R. PALANIMUTHUversusRETURNING OFFICER

1984 INSC 4623 February 1984Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant challenged the election of the second respondent from a Scheduled Tribes reserved assembly constituency, alleging that the respondent falsely claimed to belong to the Konda Reddy Scheduled Tribe and had obtained a fraudulent community certificate. The Returning Officer had accepted the nomination based on

ACTION COMMITTEE ON ISSUE OF CASTE CERTIFICATE TO SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 26218 July 1994Dismissed

The Action Committee on Issue of Caste Certificate filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging Maharashtra's denial of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe benefits to persons who had migrated from other states. The petition argued that the denial violated Articles 14, 15(1), 16(2), 19 and the spirit of Articles

VINAY PRAKASH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1997 INSC 15217 February 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, members of the Lohar community in Bihar, sought recognition as a Scheduled Tribe (ST) under the name "Lohara" based on a Presidential notification. The Supreme Court examined whether the erroneous inclusion of "Lohars" in the Hindi translation of the notification, absent in the English version, could c

KAILASH SONKARversusSMT. MAYA DEVI

1983 INSC 20016 December 1983Dismissed

The case concerned an election dispute in Madhya Pradesh where the respondent, Maya Devi, claimed to belong to the Katia scheduled caste despite being born to Christian parents. The appellant challenged her eligibility, arguing that conversion to Christianity caused a loss of caste and that reconversion could not reviv

T. KOCHAversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2016 INSC 31613 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

T. Kocha, claiming membership of the Thandan community (a Scheduled Caste in Kerala), was appointed as a High School Assistant on 3 February 1989 under the SC reservation. Later a vigilance inquiry concluded she belonged to the Ezhava/Thiyya community and therefore was not a Scheduled Caste, leading to a show‑cause not

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.versusMANA ADIM JAMAT MANDAL

2006 INSC 1478 March 2006Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Mana community in Maharashtra is a sub‑tribe of the Gond tribe or a distinct Scheduled Tribe, and whether state resolutions could alter the status conferred by the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order. The Court held that the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, as amended by P

DADAJI ALIAS DINAversusSUKHDEOBABU & ORS.

1979 INSC 2327 November 1979Dismissed

In the 1978 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election for the Armori constituency (reserved for Scheduled Tribes), the appellant Dadaji was declared elected, claiming membership in the "Mana" community. The unsuccessful candidate challenged the election, arguing that Dadaji did not belong to any Scheduled Tribe listed

E. V. CHINNAIAHversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

2004 INSC 6445 November 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The Andhra Pradesh government, after a commission report, enacted the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes (Rationalisation of Reservation) Act, 2000, which divided the 59 castes listed under Article 341 into four groups and allocated separate reservation percentages to each. The petitioners challenged the Act on the ground

KUMARI MADHURI PATIL AND ANR.versusADDL. COMMLSSIONER, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORS.

1994 INSC 3482 September 1994Dismissed

The appellants, sisters Suchita and Madhuri Patil, obtained caste certificates claiming they belonged to the Mahadeo Koli Scheduled Tribe and were admitted to medical and dental colleges on that basis. The Verification Committee, after examining ancestral, school and anthropological evidence, held that they were Koli o

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search