Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusVISWANADULA CHETTI BABU ETC.

2010 INSC 89530 December 2010Dismissed

The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed against the High Court's decision upholding the conviction of Viswanadula Chettri Babu and others under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The central issue was whether an investigation conducted by an Assistant Sub‑Inspector of Police co

NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ON DALIT HUMAN RIGHTS & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2016 INSC 114015 December 2016Disposed off

The National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights and other NGOs filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking enforcement of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and its 1995 Rules, alleging widespread non‑implementation by State and Central authorities. They pleaded for directions

ASHABAI MACHINDRA ADHAGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2009 INSC 15412 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed an FIR alleging an offence under Section 3(1)(ix) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The accused filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of the proceedings on the ground that the FIR did not mention his caste. The Bombay High Court allow

STATE OF PUNJABversusHARDIAL SINGH AND ORS.

2009 INSC 7758 May 2009Case Partly allowed

The State of Punjab appealed a High Court order that quashed charges against Hardial Singh and others for offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, on the ground that the investigation was not carried out by an officer of at least Deputy Superintendent ra

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search