Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Societies Registration Act

21 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

L.C.A.R.versusSATISH KUMAR AND ANR.

1998 INSC 16431 March 1998Case Allowed

The Agricultural Research Service (ICAR) revised its scientists' pay scales and service rules retrospectively to align with the UGC pay package effective 1 January 1986. The respondent, a Scientist S‑1 appointed in 1982, claimed a vested right to promotion under the old five‑yearly assessment scheme, which would have m

MAHARASHTRA CHESS ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 82329 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Maharashtra Chess Association, a society affiliated to the All India Chess Federation, was disaffiliated by the Federation and filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court under Article 226 challenging the action. The Federation invoked Clause 21 of its Constitution and Bye‑laws, which stipulated that any suit ag

THE COLLECTOR (DISTT. MAGISTRATE) ALLAHABAD AND ANR.versusRAJA RAM JAISWAL ETC.

1985 INSC 10929 April 1985Disposed off

Raja Ram Jaiswal purchased land (Plot No. 26) to build a cinema theatre. The Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, opposing the cinema, sought acquisition of the same land for the purported public purpose of extending its Sangrahalaya, leading to a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The notification w

A.C. MUTHIAHversusBOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA AND ANR.

2011 INSC 33728 April 2011Matter referred to larger bench

The appellant, a former President of the BCCI, challenged an amendment to Clause 6.2.4 of the BCCI's Regulations that exempted IPL, Champions League and Twenty‑20 events from the ban on administrators having commercial interests. He argued that the amendment was made to benefit the second respondent, who as a BCCI offi

ARUNIMA BARUAHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 49027 April 2007Dismissed

The appellant, a confirmed employee of the Indian Council for Child Welfare, challenged her termination by filing a suit in the District Court and seeking an interim injunction. She subsequently filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution without disclosing the pending suit, later withdrawing the suit.

INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCYversusRAM PYARE PANDEY

1995 INSC 13824 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Pyare Pandey was appointed as a temporary Junior Clerk in the Integrated Rural Development Agency, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, and was terminated within a month. He sued for a declaration that the termination violated Rule 13(b) of the agency's own rules, which required one month's no

KALYANESHWARIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2011 INSC 6021 January 2011Disposed off

The NGO Kalyaneshwari filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus to ban all mining and manufacturing of asbestos in India and to set up a committee for victim identification. The Court examined whether it could legislate a ban, whether the petition was a bona fide public‑interest litigation, and whether

T.M. SAMPATH & ORS.versusSECRETARY, MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES & ORS.

2015 INSC 5120 January 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals and writ petitions filed by employees of the National Water Development Agency (NWDA) and Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (JNVS) who sought to be covered under the Office Memorandum (O.M.) dated 1‑May‑1987 and the Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Court held that NWD

C.S.I.R & ORS.versusRAMESH CHANDRA AGRAWAL & ANR.

2008 INSC 149719 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a scheme framed by CSIR for the absorption/regularisation of researchers who had completed at least 15 years of research work, with a cut‑off date of 2 May 1997. The petitioners (researchers) argued that the cut‑off date and the 15‑year requirement were arbitrary, discriminatory and that they

B. S. MINHASversusINDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE & ORS.

1983 INSC 15119 October 1983Case Allowed

The petitioners challenged the appointment of Shri B.P. Adhikari as Director of the Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) on the grounds that the ISI, being a body controlled by the Union Government, is a "state" or "other authority" under Article 12 and therefore subject to judicial review under Article 32. They also con

M/S. KAMAKSHI BUILDERSversusM/.S. AMBEDKAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ORS.

2007 INSC 63718 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kamakshi Builders, entered into a partnership with the owner of a property (Respondent No.3) and, through an arbitration award, acquired ownership of the premises that had been leased to Ambedkar Educational Society (Respondent No.1). The society claimed title to the property on the basis of an alleged o

CHANDER MOHAN KHANNAversusNATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING AND ORS.

1991 INSC 24117 September 1991Dismissed

The appellant, an employee of the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), challenged his termination by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition, holding that NCERT was not an "instrumentality or authority" within the meaning of Art

ISHWAR CHANDA SHARMAversusDEVENDRA KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.

2025 INSC 70015 May 2025Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard a Special Leave Petition filed by Ishwar Chanda Sharma challenging a High Court order that directed the appointment of a receiver for Sri Giriraj Temple in Mathura with a preference for a person from the Vaishnav Sampradaya rather than a practising advocate. The Court examined the long‑standing

JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH (RETD.)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 24812 April 2021Disposed off

Retired Justice V. Eswaraiah filed a Special Leave Petition challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that directed retired Supreme Court Judge R.V. Raveendran to conduct an enquiry into the authenticity of a conversation recorded on a pen‑drive. The High Court had earlier closed the preliminary objection o

DELHI PRADESH REGD. MED. PRT. ASSN.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2011 INSC 20111 March 2011Dismissed

The Delhi Pradesh Regulated Medical Practitioners Association filed a review petition before the Supreme Court challenging a judgment that dismissed its claim to practice medicine on the basis of qualifications awarded by the Hindi Sahitya Sammelan. The sole ground advanced was that the Association's counsel was absent

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN & ORS.versusL.V. SUBRAMANYESWARA & ANR.

2007 INSC 55210 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) appointed certain teachers on an ad‑hoc basis to fill leave vacancies, stipulating that such appointments did not confer any right to regularisation. The teachers continued in service after the High Court’s interim orders and sought regularisation, invoking the Supreme Court’s dec

KAYASTHA PATHSHALA, ALLAHABAD AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusRAJENDRA PRASAD AND ANR.

1989 INSC 3818 December 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Rajendra Prasad, was appointed as a chemistry lecturer in 1962 at Kulbhaskar Ashram Agriculture Intermediate College run by Kayastha Pathshala Society. After a series of suspensions and litigations spanning over 25 years, the Allahabad High Court ordered his reinstatement and payment of full arrears of

RAJENDRA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF RATASTHAN AND OTHERS

1999 INSC 445 February 1999Dismissed

The Rajasthan Government created District Rural Development Agencies (DRDAs) as societies funded entirely by the State to implement various poverty‑alleviation schemes. Employees, including Class‑III and Class‑IV staff, were appointed on temporary six‑month contracts under the State Rural Development Agency Employees S

KRISHAN LAL GERAversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2011 INSC 4324 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation alleging that the District Sports Council of Faridabad had granted a 99‑year lease of a portion of Nahar Singh Stadium to the District Cricket Association Club (DCA Club) for a token rent of Re.1 per year, and that the club subsequently sub‑let the premises for commerci

RAJASTHAN PRADESH V.S. SARDARSHAHAR AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 3341 June 2010Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether holders of the "Vaidya Visharad" or "Ayurved Ratna" certificates issued by the Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag after 1967 could practice medicine under the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, and whether the cut‑off date of 1967 in Entry 105 of the Act’s Second Schedule was arbi

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search