Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The petitioners and the complainant settled a private dispute through a Memorandum of Understanding and full repayment of the claimed amount, after which the complainant filed a consent affidavit. They jointly moved the High Court to quash FIR No. 779 of 2026, filed under sections 318(4), 316(2), …
The applicant sought quashing of Criminal Case No. 0872/2026, filed under section 318(4) of the Bombay Nursing Service (BNS), on the ground that the parties had settled the dispute and the complainant, an advocate, filed a consent affidavit confirming receipt of Rs.9,68,500. The High Court, invoking …
The petitioner, Akhil Bhartiya Jan Kalyan Parishad, filed an application seeking restoration of a civil writ jurisdiction case (CWJC No.18065 of 2024) that had been dismissed for non‑compliance with a peremptory order dated 23‑09‑2025. The petitioner argued that the requisites for issuing a notice …
The case concerned workers who had been handling coal and iron‑ore at Chennai Port Trust and later claimed regularisation of their services after the activity was shifted to Ennore Port Trust. The workers formed an association, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the port trust …
The Supreme Court examined the land‑holding of Escorts Farms Ltd., which occupied land released by the Uttar Pradesh government to the former ruler of Kashipur under a Government Grant and later became subject to the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act. The State initiated …
