Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Specific Relief Act, 1963

479 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

RAMESH CHAND (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS.versusASRUDDIN (DEAD) THROUGH LRSANDANOTHER

2015 INSC 735Disposed off

The plaintiff claimed that a sale agreement dated 21‑06‑2004 with the defendant for a 12‑kanal land, mortgaged to a bank, was breached when the defendant failed to execute the sale deed after receiving Rs 4 lakhs as earnest money. The defendant contended that he had already sold the same land to a …

HEMANTA MONDAL AND OTHERSversusSRI GANESH CHANDRA NASKAR

2015 INSC 1025Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from a sale agreement where the buyer paid Rs.60,000 as earnest money and agreed to pay the balance upon execution of a sale deed. The buyer sought specific performance, possession and injunction, but the sellers refused to execute the deed, questioning …

K. NANJAPPA (DEAD) BY LRS.versusR.A. HAMEED ALIAS AMEERSAB (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ANOTHER

2015 INSC 625Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 2 September 1967 concerning immovable property. The agreement was written on a quarter‑sheet of paper and was produced in a criminal proceeding, leading the High Court to decree specific performance in favour of the …

SATYA PAL ANANDversusSTATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 988

Satya Pal Anand, a septuagenarian, claimed that a plot of land allotted to his mother by a cooperative society was unlawfully cancelled by the society through a Deed of Extinguishment dated 9‑8‑2001, and that subsequent sale deeds to third parties were also void. The Sub‑Registrar refused to cancel …

HANUMAPPA CHANNAPPA HULLUR (D) BY LRS.versusSHIVAMARUTHAPPA PARAPPA KALLI & ORS.

2015 INSC 592Disposed off

The plaintiff sought specific performance of a sale agreement executed by the father (vendor) who claimed to sell an entire joint family property, although he owned only a one‑third share. The High Court dismissed the suit, holding the agreement invalid without the consent of the other co‑owners. …

NANDKISHORE LALBHAI MEHTAversusNEW ERA FABRICS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 490Dismissed

The appellant, Nandkishore Lalbhai Mehta, entered into a sale agreement with the respondents for a plot in Mahim, subject to obtaining consent from the Mill Mazdoor Sabha (labour union) and various statutory permissions. The union refused consent, and the respondents declared the agreement cancelled …

PADMAKUMARI & ORS.versusDASAYYAN &ORS.

2015 INSC 288Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Padmakumari & ors., entered into an unregistered agreement to purchase 2.08 acres of land from defendants 1‑11, agreeing to pay the balance consideration of Rs 63,000 within nine months. The plaintiff failed to make this payment within the stipulated period, while defendants 12‑15 …

P. R. YELUMALAIversusN.M. RAVI

2015 INSC 271Disposed off

The plaintiff‑buyer entered into a sale agreement and obtained a decree for specific performance, which required him to deposit the balance consideration of Rs.33,60,000 within one month of the decree and in the form of a demand draft. The trial court extended the time by two months, making the …

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusGAURAV KUKREJA

2015 INSC 254Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against a Delhi High Court order that directed conversion of a leasehold plot to freehold in favour of Gaurav Kukreja. The plot was originally held under a perpetual sub‑lease and was subject to an agreement to sell and a General Power of Attorney …

NANJAPPANversusRAMASAMY &ANR

2015 INSC 152Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Nanjappan, entered into a 1987 sale agreement to sell his sole property for Rs 45,000, receiving an advance of Rs 25,000, with the balance to be paid within 2½ years. The time for execution was extended repeatedly, ultimately spanning eight years, and the respondents paid a total …

M/S. SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusT. THANKAM

2015 INSC 141Disposed off

Sundaram Finance Ltd. filed a suit for injunction to restrain the repossession of a vehicle financed to T. Thankam. The loan agreement contained an arbitration clause (clause 22) and a repossession clause (clause 14.6). The respondent filed the injunction suit in a civil court; the appellant moved …

ZARIF AHMAD (D} THROUGH LRS. & ANOTHERversusMOHD. FAROOQ

2015 INSC 66Dismissed

The plaintiff, Mohd. Farooq, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants, Zarif Ahmad and another, from interfering with his possession of plot No. 358, describing the land by its boundaries and municipal number. The trial court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, …

EMBASSY HOTELS PVT.LTD.versusMIS. GAJARAJ & CO. & ORS.

2014 INSC 1026Appeal(s) allowed

Embassy Hotels Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit for specific performance of a 1978 agreement for sale of land that had been mortgaged by the vendor, M/s. Gajaraj & Co., to Srinivasa Perumal Financing Corporation. The mortgaged land was sold by court auction to the appellant, who obtained a sale certificate …

RATHNAVATHI & ANOTHERversusKAVITA GANASHAMDAS

2014 INSC 751Disposed off

The plaintiff entered into a 1989 agreement to purchase a house from defendant No.2, paid the full consideration, but the seller failed to execute the sale deed. The plaintiff filed two suits: one for permanent injunction to prevent dispossession by defendant No.1 and No.2, and another for specific …

ZARINA SIDDIQUIversusA. RAMALINGAMALIAS R.AMARNATHAN

2014 INSC 752Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff sought specific performance of a 1979 agreement whereby the first defendant, owner of a one‑third undivided share in a Bangalore property, through his brother (the second defendant) who held a registered power of attorney, agreed to sell the share for Rs 40,000. The plaintiff paid the …

RASHEEDA KHATOON (D) THROUGH LRS.versusASHIQ ALI S/O LT. ABU MOHD (D) THROUGH LRS.

2014 INSC 701Dismissed

The case concerned an alleged oral gift (hiba) of a house by Abdul Haq, a Muslim, to Rasheeda Khatoon about seven years before his death. After Haq's death, his heirs sought possession, prompting Rasheeda to file a suit for declaration of ownership. The trial court and first appellate court held the …

K.PRAKASHversusB.R. SAMPATH KUMAR

2014 INSC 659Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K. Prakash, sued B.R. Sampath Kumar for specific performance of a 2003 agreement to sell a Bangalore property for Rs.16.10 lakh, having paid Rs.5.45 lakh as advance. The respondent contended the agreement was signed under mental pressure and that the price was far below market value, …

TELIKICHERLA SESIBHUSHAN (DEAD) BY LRS.versusKALLI RAJA RAO (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.

2014 INSC 610Dismissed

The appellant, Telikicherla Sesibhushan, agreed to purchase land from the deceased respondent, Kalli Raja Rao, and to repay a Rs.20,000 loan taken by the respondent from a bank. The appellant made partial payments but failed to repay the entire loan, leading to a decree against the bank's suit for …

PEMMADA PRABHAKAR & ORS.versusYOUNGMENS VYSYA ASSOCIATION & ORS.

2014 INSC 549Case Partly allowed

The suit involved a self‑acquired, intestate property of the deceased Pemmada Venkateswara Rao, which devolved equally among his wife, three sons and three daughters under the Hindu Succession Act. The plaintiffs sought specific performance of a sale agreement that was executed only by two of the …

RAM DAAN (D) THROUGH LRS.versusURBAN DEVELOPMENT TRUST

2014 INSC 989Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Daan filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to prevent Urban Development Trust from dispossessing him of a 4,914‑sq‑yard plot, claiming uninterrupted possession since 1942. The respondent asserted that the land belonged to the State of Rajasthan and that the appellant had been evicted in …

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusDINSHAW SHAPOORJI ANKLESARI & ORS.

2014 INSC 361Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned a 0.90‑acre parcel of land in Pune Cantonment held under an 1827 government grant. The respondents had purchased the lease‑hold rights and the superstructure on the land, while the Union of India (Pune Cantonment Board) issued a resumption notice in 1971 claiming the land …

NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MIHONA AND ANR.versusMADHYA PRADESH MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 1961

2014 INSC 263Appeal(s) allowed

The Nagar Palika Parishad, Mihona issued notices under the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 to Ramnath for encroaching on a public road. Ramnath filed a suit seeking declaration of title over the land and a permanent injunction, claiming ancestral ownership. The trial court and two appellate …

RAJINDER KUMARversusSHRI KULDEEP SINGH & OTHERS

2014 INSC 84Disposed off

Eight legal heirs sold a Delhi property to Kuldeep Singh in 1980, with the balance consideration to be paid after obtaining permission from the Land & Development Officer. A minor heir, Rajinder Kumar, challenged the agreement, and Kuldeep Singh filed a suit for specific performance which was …

L.S. SIKANDAR (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusK. SUBRAMANI & ORS.

2013 INSC 577

The plaintiff sought specific performance of a 1983 agreement of sale and a permanent injunction, but the agreement had been terminated by a notice on 28‑03‑1985 after the plaintiff failed to pay the balance consideration and obtain required permissions within the stipulated five‑month period …

U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD & ORS.versusOM PRAKASH SHARMA

2013 INSC 271Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (the Board) conducted a public auction of a plot, where Om Prakash Sharma was the highest bidder and deposited earnest money. The Housing Commissioner later rejected his bid, prompting Sharma to sue for a declaration that the auction was binding and the …

RAMJI GUPTA & ANR.versusGOPI KRISHAN AGRAWAL (D) & ORS.

2013 INSC 242Dismissed

The dispute involved a landlord-tenant suit where the tenants claimed ownership of a shop based on a sale deed executed by a life‑estate holder, Janki Bibi (2nd). An earlier 1958 judgment had held that Janki Bibi possessed only a life interest and could not transfer the property. The Small Causes …

VENKATARAJA & ORS.versusVIDYANE DOURERADJAPERUMAL (D) THR.LRS. & ORS.

2013 INSC 236Dismissed

The appellants sought a declaration of title to a property in Pondicherry, alleging that a prior sale by a Hindu widow who held only a life estate was void. The trial court dismissed the suit for lack of a claim for possession, a decision upheld by the High Court, which also held that the widow had …

JOSEPH JOHN PETER SANDYversusVERONICA THOMAS RAJKUMAR & ANR

2013 INSC 156Dismissed

The appellant, Joseph John Peter Sandy, sought a decree of rectification of a 1981 settlement deed that had transferred a house to his sister, Veronica Thomas Rajkumar, alleging a mistake and that the parties intended to exchange the properties. The sister contested, claiming the alleged agreement …

THOMSON PRESS (INDIA) LTD.versusNANAK BUILDERS & INVESTORS P. LTD. & ORS.

2013 INSC 118Appeal(s) allowed

Nanak Builders sued the Sawhneys for specific performance of a 1986 sale agreement. While the suit was pending, the Sawhneys transferred the suit property to Thomson Press (India) Ltd. despite a court injunction and public notice of the dispute. Thomson Press applied under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to be …

THE STATE OF A.P. & ORS.versusM/S. STAR BONE MILL & FERTILISER CO.

2013 INSC 116Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh (appellant) challenged a civil suit filed by Mis. Star Bone Mill & Fertiliser Co. (respondent) seeking declaration of title over a 3.525‑acre land. The respondent relied on a registered sale deed dated 11‑Nov‑1959 executed by M/s A. Allauddin & Sons, who were merely …

MOHD. MEHTAB KHAN & ORS.versusKHUSHNUMA IBRAHIM & ORS.

2013 INSC 57Disposed off

The appellants (defendants 5, 10 and 11) challenged an interim mandatory injunction granted by the Bombay High Court in a suit filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, which ordered the Receiver to hand over possession of a flat and office to the plaintiffs. The trial court had …

SATYA JAIN (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.versusANIS AHMED RUSHDIE (D) TR.LRS. & ORS.

2012 INSC 555Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a suit for specific performance of a 1970 agreement to sell a Delhi bungalow. The plaintiffs argued they were ready to fulfil their obligations, while the defendant claimed the suit was time‑barred and that the plaintiffs breached clause 7 by not paying an additional Rs 1 …

VASANTI BHATversusPREMLATA AGARWAL & ANR. ETC.

2012 INSC 532Disposed off

Four suits for specific performance were filed by Premlata Agarwal against a developer concerning four flats, while Vasanti Bhat, a purchaser of a different flat (No. 703), had paid Rs. 38 lakhs and received a possession letter. The High Court single judge appointed a receiver over flats 703 and 801 …

M/S VIRGO INDUSTRIES (ENG.) P.LTD.versusM/S.VENTURETECH SOLUTIONS P.LTD.

2012 INSC 383Appeal(s) allowed

Virgo Industries (Eng.) Ltd filed two suits in 2005 seeking a permanent injunction against VentureTech Solutions Ltd to prevent alienation of two parcels of land. In 2007, while those suits were still pending, Virgo filed two additional suits for specific performance of the same sale agreements. The …

UNION OF INDIAversusIBRAHIM UDDIN & ANR.

2012 INSC 288Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a suit seeking a declaration of title over agricultural land, alleging ancestral grant from the Maratha Government and a partition in 1819, while the Union of India contested the title. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court reversed the decision by …

THE CHURCH OF CHRIST CHARITABLE TRUST & EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMANversusM/S PONNIAMMAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON/ MANAGING TRUSTEE

2012 INSC 264Appeal(s) allowed

The Church of Christ Charitable Trust & Educational Charitable Society (appellant) challenged the Madras High Court Division Bench’s reversal of a single judge’s order rejecting the plaint against it in a suit for specific performance filed by M/s Ponniamman Educational Trust (respondent). The …

M/S BEST SELLERS RETAIL (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusM/S ADITYA BIRLA NUVO LTD. & ORS.

2012 INSC 214Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Best Sellers Retail (India) Pvt. Ltd. (and A.C. Thirumalaraj), challenged a temporary injunction granted to respondent Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. that restrained the defendants from leasing or encumbering a suit property pending a suit for specific performance. The trial court and High …

PRAKASH CHANDRAversusNARAYAN

2012 INSC 182Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land, having paid earnest money, while the respondent failed to execute the sale deed. The trial court decreed specific performance, but the first appellate court reversed the decree on the ground that granting …

HARDEEP KAURversusMALKIAT KAUR

2012 INSC 136Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute involved a suit for specific performance of a land sale agreement where the trial court decreed specific performance, the District Judge reversed the decree and ordered a refund of earnest money, and the High Court allowed a second appeal, set aside the District Judge’s order and …

J. SAMUEL AND OTHERSversusGATTU MAHESH AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 31Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents filed a suit for specific performance of a sale contract, but their plaint omitted the mandatory averment under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act that they were ready and willing to perform. After the trial concluded and the matter was reserved for judgment, they sought to …

SURESH DHANUKAversusSUNLTA MOHAPATRA

2011 INSC 831Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Suresh Dhanuka, and respondent, Sunita Mahapatra, entered into a joint‑venture and a deed of assignment whereby the respondent assigned 50% of her rights in the trademark "Naturoma Herbal" to the appellant, with a covenant that the mark be marketed solely by the appellant and that …

CHATTERJEE PETROCHEM (I) PVT. LTD.versusHALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LTD. & ORS.

2011 INSC 729Dismissed

The Chatterjee Group filed a Company Petition under Sections 397, 398, 399, 402, 403 and 406 of the Companies Act, 1956 alleging oppression by Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. (HPL) for failing to register 155 million shares transferred to them and for allotting 150 million shares to Indian Oil …

COROMANDEL INDAG PRODUCTS (P) LTD.versusGARUDA CHIT & TRADING CO. P. LTD. & ANR.

2011 INSC 579Dismissed

Coromandel Indag Products Ltd. entered into a sale agreement with Garuda Chit & Trading Co. to purchase a property for Rs. 82 lakhs, paying an advance and subsequent installments while the vendor was to furnish title documents and an income‑tax clearance. The vendor supplied the tax clearance but …

MIS. CITADEL FINE PHARMACEUTICALSversusMIS. RAMANIYAM REAL ESTATES P. LTD. & ANR.

2011 INSC 549Disposed off

Citadel Fine Pharmaceuticals (vendor) and Ramaniyam Real Estates (buyer) entered into a sale agreement for 66 cents of land, of which 19 cents were declared excess under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act. The contract made time of the essence, requiring the buyer to obtain clearance from the …

MRS. SARADAMANI KANDAPPANversusMRS. S. RAJALAKSHMI & ORS.

2011 INSC 446Disposed off

The appellant entered into an agreement of sale for immovable property, paying an advance and agreeing to pay the balance in three instalments, with clause 6 expressly making timely payment the essence of the contract. The respondents cancelled the agreement when the appellant failed to pay the …

PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PATIALAversusMANGAL SINGH AND ORS.

2011 INSC 387Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether employees of the Pepsu Road Transport Corporation could claim pension benefits under a scheme introduced in 1992 despite not exercising the option to join the scheme or refunding advances taken from the employer's C.P.F. contribution as required by the …

VIMALESHWAR NAGAPPA SHETversusNOOR AHMED SHERIFF & ORS.

2011 INSC 381Dismissed

The appellant, Vimaleshwar Nagappa Shet, bought a dwelling house from several co‑sharers of a deceased owner but the agreement of sale did not include the minor grandson (Defendant No. 3). The minor did not join the sale and later offered to purchase the 9/11 share, prompting the High Court to fix a …

BOOZ-ALLEN & HAMILTON INC.versusSBI HOME FINANCE LTD. & ORS.

2011 INSC 301Dismissed

The appellant, Booz‑Allen & Hamilton Inc., sought to refer a mortgage suit filed by SBI Home Finance Ltd. to arbitration under clause 16 of a tripartite deposit agreement. The High Court rejected the application, holding that the dispute was not covered by the arbitration clause, that the appellant …

GIAN KAURversusRAGHUBIR SINGH

2011 INSC 97Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Gian Kaur, filed a suit seeking a declaration of ownership of 16 kanals of land, along with a consequential permanent injunction and an alternative prayer for possession. The trial court and first appellate court decreed the suit, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court reversed, …

RAJ KISHORE (DEAD) BY LRS.versusPREM SINGH & ORS.

2010 INSC 870Dismissed

The plaintiff Raj Kishore executed a sale deed in 1974 transferring land to Prem Singh for Rs 6,000, claiming it was a security for a loan and that an agreement for re‑conveyance would revert the land upon repayment by 6 July 1981. He sued for a declaration that the sale deed was void and that he …

D.R. RATHNA MURTHYversusRAMAPPA

2010 INSC 696Dismissed

The appellant purchased a plot of land on 23 April 1986 and sold it the next day to the respondent by a registered sale deed. In 1991-92 the appellant claimed the deed was conditional, asserting that the word "Avadhi" and a clause allowing repurchase within ten years had been inserted after …

KAMMANA SAMBAMURTHY (D) BY LRS.versusKALIPATNAPU ATCHUTAMMA (D) AND ORS.

2010 INSC 697Dismissed

The vendee, Kammana Sambamurthy, entered into a sale agreement with the vendor, Kalipatnapu Kamaraju, for an entire house, paying an advance of Rs.10,000. The vendor's wife, Kalipatnapu Atchutamma, later claimed a half‑share in the property under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act and sought …

HAR NARAIN (DEAD) BY LRS.versusMAM CHAND (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2010 INSC 700Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the legal representatives of the deceased Har Narain, entered into an agreement for sale of eight kanals of land with the owner, Mam Chand, who later executed a sale deed in favour of respondents 2‑6 on 2 August 1971. The deed was registered on 3 September 1971, after the appellant …

MAN KAUR (DEAD) BY LRS.versusHARTAR SINGH SANGHA

2010 INSC 672Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Man Kaur, owned a plot that was sold to the respondent, Hartar Singh Sangha, by an agreement executed through attorney‑holders. The respondent paid earnest money and claimed he was ready to complete the purchase, but the vendor failed to execute the sale deed. The respondent sued for …

MEGHMALA & ORS.versusG. NARASIMHA REDDY & ORS.

2010 INSC 516Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants purchased land by a registered sale deed dated 21‑May‑1980. The respondents alleged that an earlier agreement to sell the land to a cooperative society in 1976 gave them a right, and they accused the appellants of fraud and land grabbing. A Special Court under the Andhra Pradesh Land …

SUBHADRA AND ORS.versusTHANKAM

2010 INSC 385Dismissed

The appellants entered into an agreement to sell a 5‑cent parcel of land together with the structures described in Exhibit 81 to the respondent for a total price of Rs.45,250. After paying earnest money, a dispute arose over the extent of the property to be transferred, with the appellants …

LAXMAN TATYABA KANKATE & ANR.versusTARAMATI HARISHCHANDRA DHATRAK

2010 INSC 386Dismissed

The respondents entered into an agreement to sell land to the appellants and paid Rs 10,000 as earnest money, but the appellants failed to execute the sale deed. The respondents sued for specific performance and, alternatively, for refund of the earnest money. The trial court awarded only the …

VINOD SETHversusDEVINDER BAJAJ AND ANR.

2010 INSC 347Case Partly allowed

The plaintiff, a builder, sued the owners of a residential property for specific performance of an alleged oral collaboration agreement to develop the land. The High Court, noting the suit's low chance of success and heavy court dockets, ordered the plaintiff to furnish an undertaking to pay Rs.25 …

ANDHRA PRADESH TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. & ANR.versusM/S. PAMPA HOTELS LTD.

2010 INSC 227Disposed off

The dispute arose between Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd (APTDC) and Pampa Hotels Ltd over lease and management agreements executed on 30‑March‑2002, which contained arbitration clauses. Pampa Hotels Ltd was incorporated only on 9‑April‑2003, so it did not exist when the …

S. KALADEVIversusV.R. SOMASUNDARAM AND ORS.

2010 INSC 205Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, S. Kaladevi, filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement for an immovable property, seeking execution of a fresh sale deed and an injunction. The sale deed dated 27‑02‑2006 had been executed but could not be registered because of an attachment on the property, and the …

SADASHIV SHYAM SAWANT (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.versusANITA ANANT SAWANT

2010 INSC 114Dismissed

Anita Sawant, the landlady, owned a house which she let to a tenant. On 1 October 1988 the defendants forcibly evicted the tenant and took possession of the premises. The landlady filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for recovery of possession against the defendants. The …

BHUPINDER KUMARversusANGREJ SINGH

2009 INSC 1092Dismissed

The appellant Bhupinder Kumar entered into a sale agreement and later sued for specific performance. The trial court decreed specific performance, directing the respondent to execute the sale deed and the appellant to pay the balance within three months. The appellant failed to deposit the balance …

H.V. VEDAVYASACHARversusSHIVASHANKARA & ANR.

2009 INSC 996Disposed off

The plaintiff, H.V. Vedavyasachar, sued Shivashankara and others for a permanent injunction and a mandatory injunction directing possession of the suit property. The trial court decreed the suit. On appeal, the respondents filed an application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC to adduce additional …

SONU BABU BHAMBID & ORS.versusDREAM DEVELOPERS & ORS.

2009 INSC 930Dismissed

The appellants, slum dwellers, entered into a rehabilitation agreement with the respondents, a developer, which required them to obtain an eligibility certificate before the scheme could be invoked. They failed to secure the certificate, yet the developer began commercial construction on the …

INDERCHAND JAIN (D) THROUGH L.RS.versusMOTILAL (D) THROUGH L.RS.

2009 INSC 937Appeal(s) allowed

The parties entered into a sale agreement for a haveli; the buyer sued for specific performance and obtained a decree, which the seller appealed and had set aside. During the appeal the seller withdrew the amount deposited by the buyer, and the High Court again set aside the trial court decree. Both …

APOLLO TYRES LTD.versusC.P. SABASTIAN

2009 INSC 651Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, an employee of Apollo Tyres Ltd., filed a civil suit seeking declaration that he remained a workman, challenging his transfer, restraining the employer from forcing a promotion, and protecting his trade‑union activities. The employer contended that the civil court lacked jurisdiction …

PRANAB KUMAR PALversusM/S. LIZ. INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2009 INSC 559Disposed off

The petition filed by Liz Investment Pvt. Ltd. before the Company Law Board (CLB) alleged that the appellant, Pranab Kumar Pal, diverted a corporate opportunity and sought to restrain his resignation as a director. The CLB initially ordered the appointment of three directors by the petitioner and …

U.P. STATE SUGAR & CANE DEVELOPMENT LTD.versusRAZA BULAND SUGAR CO.LTD. AND ORS

2009 INSC 547Disposed off

The case concerned the interpretation of clause (vi) of Section 2(h) of the Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971, which defines a "scheduled undertaking" to include certain lands and buildings. Raza Buland Sugar Co. sought a declaration that several properties listed in its …

OM PRAKASH SINGHversusM. LINGAMAIAH & ORS.

2009 INSC 518Dismissed

Om Prakash Singh, a resident of Uttar Pradesh, claimed that a 16‑acre parcel of land in Andhra Pradesh was joint family property and that the Karta, Ram Katin Singh, died in 1978. He alleged that the respondents fabricated three sale deeds in 1980‑81 by forging Singh’s signature and thereby …

VISHWANATH BAPURAO SABALEversusSHALINIBAI NAGAPPA SABALE & ORS.

2009 INSC 390Dismissed

The case concerned a dispute over joint and self‑acquired properties of step‑brothers Bapurao and Shivappa. In 1955 four registered deeds – a partition deed, a sale deed and two settlement deeds – were executed, allegedly to protect Bapurao’s assets from creditors. After Shivappa’s death, the heirs …

ABDUL RAHIM & ORS.versusSK. ABDUL ZABAR & ORS.

2009 INSC 331Appeal(s) allowed

The father, Haji Sk. Abdullah, executed a registered gift deed on 21‑02‑1973 in favour of his younger son Abdul Razak, transferring a house that was let out to tenants. After the father's death, Razak died and his heirs (the appellants) succeeded to his interest. The elder son (respondent No.1) …

AZHAR SULTANAversusB. RAJAMANI & ORS.

2009 INSC 200Disposed off

Azhar Sultana entered into a sale agreement with Ramesh Chand Khanna and paid an advance of Rs 30,000. While the agreement was pending, Khanna sold the same property to defendants 5 and 6 by a registered deed, after which the plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of her original agreement. …

MADAN MOHAN MISHRAversusCHANRIKA PANDEY (DEAD) BY LRS.

2009 INSC 202Dismissed

The appellant, Madan Mohan Mishra, filed a suit in 1994 seeking to set aside a deed of gift concerning agricultural lands, alleging the deed was void. Earlier, a suit filed in 1969 concerning the same lands was abated by an order dated 17 July 1973 under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings …

SHAKUNT ALA DEVI & ORS.versusCHAMRU MAHTO & ANR.

2009 INSC 138Dismissed

The appellants sought restoration of possession of land under Section 145(6) of the Criminal Procedure Code after an Executive Magistrate had declared their right to possession in 1994. The respondent obtained a revision and the High Court set aside the lower courts' orders, invoking the Specific …

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION --I & ANR.versusBAL MUKUND BAIRWA

2009 INSC 14Reference answered

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (a State corporation) terminated several employees and the employees filed civil suits alleging violation of natural‑justice principles and statutory regulations. The Supreme Court was asked to resolve a conflict between earlier judgments on whether …

ALOKA BOSEversusPARMATMA DEVI & ORS.

2008 INSC 1458Dismissed

The appellant Aloka Bose (representing the heirs of the deceased vendor) appealed against a decree of specific performance granted to the plaintiff Parmatma Devi for the sale of a portion of a house. The dispute centered on whether a written agreement of sale signed only by the vendor, without the …

NARENDRA GOPAL VIDYARTHIversusRAJAT VIDYARTHI

2008 INSC 1385Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a Will executed by Bishan Sahai Vidyarthi in 1965, which set aside Rs.30,000 for the benefit of his widowed daughter‑in‑law Chandramukhi and her son Narendra Gopal Vidyarthi. Within a month the testator purchased an immovable property with that amount. After the testator's …

HAMIDKHANversusASHABI & ORS.

2008 INSC 1319Case Partly allowed

The plaintiff, a lease‑holder of land and superstructure since 1951, entered into a sale agreement with a charitable trust on 26 February 1980, subject to permission from the Charity Commissioner under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trust Act. The Commissioner initially ordered the property to be …

M/S. GAIL (I) LTD.versusBAL KISHAN AGARWAL GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD.

2008 INSC 915Disposed off

GAIL (I) Ltd. entered into a gas‑supply agreement with Bal Kishan Agarwal Glass Industries Ltd., but the gas meter was repeatedly found tampered, leading to successive disconnections. The respondent filed a civil suit seeking reconnection of gas without any payment or security, even though …

GAURI SHANKAR PRASAD AND ORSversusBRAHMA NAND SINGH

2008 INSC 812Dismissed

The appellants, Gauri Shankar Prasad and others, needed money and mortgaged their land to the respondent, Brahma Nano Singh, executing a sale deed and a separate deed of agreement to reconvey the land upon repayment of Rs.36,600. The agreement stipulated that reconveyance must occur within three …

RANGANAYAKAMMA AND ANOTHERversusK.S. PRAKASH (D) BY L.RS. AND OTHERS

2008 INSC 711Dismissed

The case involved two sisters who challenged a 1983 deed of partition and relinquishment of their rights in family properties in favour of their brothers, alleging fraud and lack of consideration. The lower courts had held that the properties were joint family assets, the partition was a family …

ARJAN SINGHversusPUNIT AHLUWALIA & ORS.

2008 INSC 668Case Partly allowed

Arjan Singh filed a suit for specific performance of a contract concerning a Chandigarh property and obtained an interim injunction that was extended up to 16 October 1996. A second suit was filed by Sanjeev Sharma against the same owner, Dr. Bawa, and the parties entered into a compromise on 19 …

DADU DAYALU MAHASABHA, JAIPUR (TRUST)versusMAHANT RAM NIWAS AND ANOTHER

2008 INSC 635Disposed off

The Dadu Dayalu Mahasabha, a registered public trust, and Mahant Ram Niwas were involved in a long series of suits concerning the entitlement and management of a religious Gaddi. The Supreme Court, in the first round of litigation, held that the respondent was not entitled to the Gaddi and granted …

THOTA LAKSHMI VENKATA BALAversusMUTTAMSETTI SEETHAMMA

2008 INSC 616Dismissed

The appellant, Thota Lakshmi Venkata Bala, executed a sale agreement on 19‑August‑1991 to sell land to the respondent, Muttamsetti Seethamma, for Rs.1.5 lakh as discharge of a loan. She later cancelled the deed, claimed only Rs.1 lakh had been received and demanded the remaining Rs.50,000 with …

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusS.N. GOYAL

2008 INSC 576Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved S.N. Goyal, a Branch Manager of State Bank of India, who was found guilty of temporarily misappropriating customers' funds. The disciplinary authority first recommended a reduction in pay, which the appointing authority tentatively approved but did not communicate. After consulting …

GURUSWAMY NADARversusP. LAKSHMI AMMAL (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2008 INSC 566Dismissed

The plaintiff entered into a sale agreement with the first defendant, paid earnest money but failed to pay the balance, and filed a suit for specific performance on May 3, 1975. Two days later the first defendant sold the same property to the appellant for a higher price and gave possession. The …

HARDEO RAIversusSAKUNTALA DEVI AND OTHERS

2008 INSC 538Dismissed

In 1978 the appellant entered into a sale agreement with the respondent's father, representing that the land was already partitioned among co‑sharers and each held separate possession. The buyer paid part of the price and was given possession, but the seller failed to execute a sale deed, leading …

CORRESPONDENT, ST. MICHAEL'S T.T.IversusV.N. KARPAGA MARY & ORS.

2008 INSC 520Case Partly allowed

The respondent, a teacher appointed in 1977 with the requisite qualifications, was terminated in 1995 after a 1994 Government Order raised the qualification standards for teachers. The termination was challenged before the High Court, which quashed the order and awarded back wages, holding that the …

RAJASTHAN SRTC & ORSversusMOHAR SINGH

2008 INSC 522Dismissed

The Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation, a statutory corporation created under the Road Corporation Act, 1951, dismissed driver Mohar Singh for alleged misconduct and the dismissal was upheld by its appellate authority. Singh filed a civil suit in the Additional Munsif Court challenging …

AHMADASAHAB ABDUL MULLA (D) BY PROPOSED LRS.versusBIBIJAN & ORS.

2008 INSC 501Matter referred to larger bench

The respondents filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale, which the trial court decreed in their favour. The first appellate court dismissed the decree on the ground of limitation, holding that the pendency of a separate suit filed by the defendant's wife and children did not …

WAHEED BAIGversusSANGI LAKSHMAMMA & ORS.

2008 INSC 502Case Partly allowed

The plaintiff sought specific performance of an agreement of sale of a house that had been allotted to the defendant under a subsidised industrial housing scheme. The defendant was merely a lessee and had no title to sell the property, which vested in the Government. The trial court decreed specific …

BHARAT KARSONDAS THAKKARversusM/S KIRAN CONSTRUCTION CO. & ORS.

2008 INSC 470Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a suit filed by a construction company for specific performance of a development agreement, in which the plaintiff later sought to amend the pleadings to implead a third‑party appellant and to declare a consent decree, issued in a related earlier suit, null and void. The …

SHRI RAMESHWAR PRASAD (D) BY LRS,versusSHRI BASANTI LAL

2008 INSC 463Disposed off

Rameshwar Prasad filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, which the trial court granted. The respondent Basanti Lal appealed, and the Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside the decree, holding that the plaintiff had not pleaded or proved his readiness to pay interest, a term of the …

BAL KRISHNA AND ANR.versusBHAGWAN DAS (DEAD) AND ORS .

2008 INSC 398Dismissed

Bal Krishna and another filed a suit for specific performance of a reconveyance agreement concerning a house that had been sold in 1952. The plaintiffs claimed they were ready and willing to pay the consideration and sought a deed of reconveyance, while the defendant (deceased) denied the existence …

GURDIAL KAUR (D) THROUGH LRS.versusPIARA SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS.

2008 INSC 375Case Partly allowed

The plaintiff entered into a 1964 agreement of sale with the vendor, paid half the price and sought specific performance after the vendor failed to appear for registration and later died. Subsequent consolidation altered the revenue survey (Khasra/Khewat) numbers of the land, leading the trial court …

PURAN RAMversusBHAGURAM AND ANR.

2008 INSC 277Case Partly allowed

Puran Ram purchased agricultural land from Bhaguram but the sale deed was never executed. The agreement mistakenly described the land as Chak No. 3 SSM instead of Chak No. 3 SLM. In the suit for specific performance, the plaintiff sought to amend both the plaint and the agreement to correct this …

SILVEY & ORS.versusARUN VARGHESE & ANR.

2008 INSC 256Dismissed

Silvey & Ors., the vendors, entered into an agreement to sell 10 acres of land to Arun Vargheese & Anr., the purchasers, who paid an advance and were ready to perform their part of the contract. The vendors failed to furnish required documents, licences and registration, and alleged that the …

B.K. SRI HARSHA (D) BY L.R. & ANR.versusM/S BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD

2008 INSC 155Disposed off

MIS Bharath Heavy Electricals Ltd filed two suits for specific performance of contracts for sale of certain properties against the appellants, B.K. Sri Harsha and others. The trial court held that the respondent was in adverse possession, ready to perform, and that the agreements were valid and …

BALASAHEB DAYANDEO NAIK (DEAD) THROUGH LRS & ORS.versusAPPASAHEB DATTATRAYA PAWAR

2008 INSC 95Case Allowed

The plaintiffs entered into a written agreement to purchase agricultural land, agreeing that the sale deed would be executed within six months and that earnest money would be forfeited if the deadline was missed. The defendant failed to execute the sale deed and the plaintiffs sued for specific …

PRATAP LAKSHMAN MUCHANDI AND ORS.versusSHAMLAL UDDAVADAS WADHWA AND ORS.

2008 INSC 67Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard two civil appeals arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell land dated 24 April 1982 for Rs.1,20,000, of which Rs.10,000 had been paid as advance. The Court held that the agreement was genuine and binding, but given the 25-year lapse and the …

THE GENERAL MANAGER, PENCH AREA, PARASIA, M.P.versusBARKAN@ KANHAIYA

2007 INSC 1291Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent filed a suit for specific performance of a contract of employment, alleging that the employer had failed to appoint his son despite a clause promising employment for four persons. The trial court, first appellate court, and High Court held the suit maintainable and ordered specific …

ABDUL RAHEEMversusTHE KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.

2007 INSC 1169Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Abdul Raheem (Karnataka Electricity Board), entered into a sale agreement for land with Respondent No.1, who later sued for specific performance alleging the appellant's failure to perform. The trial court dismissed the suit, and the first appellate court upheld the dismissal, finding …

SITA RAM AND ORS.versusRADHEY SHY AM

2007 INSC 1004Dismissed

The appellants filed a suit for specific performance of a land sale contract, which the trial court decreed in their favour. The first appellate court set aside the decree, holding that the plaint did not comply with Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and the High Court dismissed the …

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusK.K. MOHANDAS AND ETC.

2007 INSC 797Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka auctions the right to vend arrack; the plaintiffs, experienced excise contractors, won the bids for the 1990‑91 excise year. The Finance Minister, in his budget speech, announced a policy to ban toddy sales statewide from 1 July 1990. The government later failed to fully …

ADHUNIK STEELS LTD.versusORISSA MANGANESE AND MINERALS PVT. LTD.

2007 INSC 742Disposed off

O.M.M. Private Limited, holder of a mining lease, terminated its contract with Adhunik Steels Ltd., alleging violation of Rule 37 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. Adhunik filed a Section 9 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an interim injunction to restrain …

LAL DEVI AND ANR.versusVANEETA JAIN AND ORS

2007 INSC 572Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a Shimla property after the vendor failed to execute the sale deed. During the trial, the vendor's counsel was absent because they were engaged in a High Court matter, and no representation of their absence was made to the …

M.M.S. INVESTMENTS, MADURAI AND ORS.versusV. VEERAPPAN AND ORS.

2007 INSC 409Dismissed

M.M.S. Investments sued Veerappan and others for specific performance of a sale agreement. After a decree was passed, the defendants sold the disputed land to new purchasers who were impleaded in the appeal. The High Court allowed the impleadment but held that the defence of readiness and …

CHANDA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusRATTNI AND ANR.

2007 INSC 337Dismissed

The plaintiff entered into an agreement to purchase land, paid earnest money and was required to pay the balance consideration and obtain execution of the sale deed within two months of the decree for specific performance. The trial court decreed specific performance, directing the defendants to …

M/S MEGHRAJ BISCUITS INDUSTRIES LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, U.P.

2007 INSC 286Dismissed

Meghraj Biscuits Industries Ltd. manufactured biscuits and sold them under the brand name “Meghraj” from 1991. The brand name was a registered trademark of Kay Aar Biscuits (P) Ltd., which also used it for biscuits. The Central Excise Department held that the appellant was not eligible for the Small …

JANARDHAN NARASIMHA NAYAKversusBALWANT VENKATESH KULKARNI AND ANR.

2007 INSC 247Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff (Respondent No. I) filed a suit for specific performance of a 1972 contract of sale. The trial court decreed in his favour, but the First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal. The plaintiff then filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC, which the Karnataka High Court allowed, …

P.S. RANAKRISHNA REDDYversusM.K. BHAGYALAKSHMI AND ANR.

2007 INSC 167Dismissed

The appellant, a landlord, had taken loans from the respondent, a tenant, and later entered into a written agreement described as a sale of the same property for Rs.45,000, with Rs.15,000 paid as advance. The respondent sued for specific performance under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, …

JANARDHANAM PRASADversusRAMDAS

2007 INSC 94Case Partly allowed

Janardhanam Prasad (appellant) entered into a sale agreement with M. Manoharan (defendant No.1) for a piece of land. The same land was later agreed to be sold by the same defendant to Ramdas (respondent No.1) without a fixed time for performance. The respondent paid part consideration but, within 20 …

MEHARCHAND DASversusLAL BABU SIDDIQUE AND ORS.

2007 INSC 59Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a tenant, held a parcha granted by the Collector under the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947. The respondents, claiming landlord status, filed a suit to set aside the parcha on grounds of fraud and lack of jurisdiction. The trial court decreed in favour of the …

MEERA CHAUHANversusHARSH BISHNOI AND ANR.

2006 INSC 1005Case Partly allowed

The suit property was bequeathed to respondent No.2 by a will, but respondent No.1 filed a suit claiming title based on an oral family settlement and obtained an ex‑parte injunction restraining respondent No.2 from transferring the property. While the injunction was in force, the appellant purchased …

RAMJI RAI AND ANR.versusJAGDISH MALLAH (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. AND ANR.

2006 INSC 947Dismissed

Ramji Rai and another filed a suit for a permanent injunction to restrain the respondents from interfering with their possession of a disputed land and from obstructing the construction of a boundary wall. The trial court decreed in their favour, but the appellate court set aside the decree on the …

M.P. MATHUR AND ORS.versusD.T.C. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 904Dismissed

The Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) constructed 300 tenements under a subsidised housing scheme and, after an amendment, passed resolutions in 1979 to sell these houses to retired industrial workers. The workers filed suit seeking a declaration that they were entitled to ownership, relying on the …

FAQUIR CHAND AND ANR.versusSUDESH KUMARI

2006 INSC 640Disposed off

The respondent filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, claiming she was ready and willing to fulfil her part by paying the consideration. The appellant contended that the suit should fail because the pleadings did not expressly state readiness and willingness as required by …

NOBLE RESOURCES LTD.versusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ANR

2006 INSC 607

Noble Resources Ltd. entered into a contract with the Orissa state-owned corporation OMC Ltd. to supply specified quantities of iron‑ore fines of grades A, B and C at agreed prices. OMC later refused to supply the remaining C‑grade quantity, citing a sharp rise in international prices and cancelled …

M. MEENAKSHI AND ORS.versusMETADIN AGARWAL(D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 562Appeal(s) allowed

The defendants, owners of excess land under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976, entered into a sale agreement with the plaintiffs that was expressly conditioned on obtaining a statutory sanction. The competent authority refused the sanction, stating that no 1,000 sq. metres of vacant …

JAI NARAIN PARASRAMPURIA (DEAD) AND ORS.versusPUSHPA DEVI SARAF AND ORS.

2006 INSC 552Appeal(s) allowed

The promoters of a proposed company purchased a house and land before incorporation and later transferred the title to the incorporated company, which was declared the owner by a decree. The promoters, acting as directors, subsequently entered into a sale agreement with the appellants and also …

INDIAN FINANCIAL ASSN. SEVENTH PAY ADVENTISTSversusM.A. UNNEERIKUTTY AND ANR.

2006 INSC 457Dismissed

The Indian Financial Association of Seventh Day Adventists (the appellant) owned a 30‑cent property containing a church, school and other buildings. It passed a resolution to sell the land and, through a duly executed power of attorney, its representative (defendant No. 2) entered into two sale …

STANDARD CHARTERED BANKversusANDHRA BANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. & ORS

2006 INSC 291Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerns the ownership of Rs. 50 crore 9% tax‑free bonds (the "suit bonds") issued by Nuclear Power Corporation Ltd. (NPCL). Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. (ABFSL) sold the bonds to Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) on 26‑27 February 1992, and SCB paid consideration and received a Banker's …

PREM SINGH AND ORS.versusBIRBAL AND ORS.

2006 INSC 280Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a sale deed executed in 1961 that purportedly showed a minor as a major, allegedly obtained by fraud. The minor later sued in 1979 to set aside the deed and claim a share in the land. The trial court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, but the appellate court held the deed …

P.D. AGRAWALversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 264Dismissed

P.O. Agrawal, a junior manager of State Bank of India, was repeatedly accused of misbehaving with senior officers and customers, leading to suspension and a series of disciplinary proceedings. After being acquitted in criminal trials, the bank’s disciplinary authority dismissed him, despite one …

UNION OF INDIAversusMIS. MILLENIUM MUMBAI BROADCAST PVT. LTD.

2006 INSC 269Dismissed

The Union of India granted FM broadcasting licences to ten operators, including Millenium Mumbai Broadcast Ltd., with a requirement to co‑locate transmission facilities. Five operators defaulted, leading the licensor to allow the remaining five to use interim facilities and later require them to pay …

MST. SUGANIversusRAMESHWAR DAS AND ANR.

2006 INSC 244Appeal(s) allowed

Mst. Sugani entered into an agreement to sell a house to Mahadeo on 13‑12‑1975 for Rs 7,000, paying Rs 5,000 as earnest money. Registration was barred by a prohibition on urban property sales, and Mahadeo later executed a sale deed in favour of Rameshwar Das and Jamuna Prasad. Sugani sued for …

KERALA SAMSTHANA CHETHU THOZHILALI UNIONversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 178Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala, after banning the sale of arrack in 1996, enacted the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002 which required that each toddy shop employ one former arrack worker. The rules (specifically Rules 4(2) and 9(10)(b)) were challenged by a federation of toddy‑tappers and toddy‑shop …

PERCEPT D'MARK (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusZAHEER KHAN

2006 INSC 161Dismissed

Percept D'Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. entered into a three‑year promotion agreement with cricketer Zaheer Khan that contained a clause giving the company a right of first refusal on any third‑party endorsement offers, even after the contract expired. After the term ended, Khan signed a similar agreement …

GUNWANTBHAI MULCHAND SHAH AND ORS.versusANTON ELIS FAREL AND ORS

2006 INSC 136Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, successors of a predecessor who had entered into a 1964 agreement to purchase a property, filed a suit on 4 April 1994 for specific performance of that agreement and a perpetual injunction, after a public notice and objections in November 1993. The defendants contended that the suit …

H.P. PYAREJANversusDASAPPA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 73Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, H.P. Pyarejan, entered into a sale agreement with five co‑owners, advancing a loan on condition that all would execute the deed. Only four signed, and the plaintiff sued for specific performance including the fifth defendant. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed the …

R.K. PARVATHARAJ GUPTAversusK.C. JAYADEVA REDDY

2006 INSC 61Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, owner of agricultural land, had taken a bank loan and entered into a sale agreement with the respondent, who was to discharge the loan by depositing the mortgage amount and execute a sale deed. The appellant served a notice on 24 April 1984 demanding the respondent deposit the full …

MOST. ETWARI DEVI AND ORS.versusMOST. PARVATI DEVI

2006 INSC 30Appeal(s) allowed

The husband of appellant No.1 (Nunu Mahto) filed a suit for specific performance against the respondent for failure to return sale deeds, claiming he was ready to pay the consideration. After his death, his heirs substituted as plaintiffs. The trial court decreed specific performance, which was …

DAYANDEOGANPAT JADHAVversusMADHAV VITHAL BHASKAR AND ORS.

2005 INSC 516Dismissed

The appellant, a tenant of agricultural lands Gut Nos. 2325 and 2326, became a deemed purchaser under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 on the tillers' day of 1 April 1957. He repeatedly expressed unwillingness to purchase the land, and the Mamlatdar and Agricultural Lands Tribunal …

P.C. VARGHESEversusDEVAKI AMMA BALAMBIKA DEVI AND ORS.

2005 INSC 501Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, P.C. Vargese, sued the respondents for specific performance of a sale agreement covering 19 cents of land, seeking also a decree of partition. The agreement required the respondents to obtain court permission to sell the minor’s one‑fourth share, which was denied during the suit. The …

ANIGLASE YOHANNANversusRAMLATHA AND ORS.

2005 INSC 437Dismissed

AnigLase Yohannan filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale executed on 15‑Feb‑1978, alleging that he had paid an advance and was ready to pay the balance, while the defendant failed to execute the sale deed within the stipulated six months. The defendant contended that the …

DEVA SAHAYAM (D) BY LRS.versusP. SAVITHRAMMA AND ORS.

2005 INSC 424Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a tenant, entered into an oral agreement of sale with the respondents (landlords) and later sued for specific performance. The respondents alienated the property to third parties and filed a counter‑claim for possession, alleging the tenant had denied the landlord's title. The trial …

MRS. SANJANA M. WIGversusHINDUSTAN PETRO CORPORATION LTD.

2005 INSC 418Dismissed

The appellant, a partnership firm dealing in automobiles, entered into a dealership agreement with Hindustan Petro Corporation which was later terminated on the death of a partner and subsequently on grounds of payment defaults. The appellant filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the …

RAJESHWARIversusPURAN INDORIA

2005 INSC 383Appeal(s) allowed

The defendant appealed a decree for specific performance of a sale agreement, which had been upheld by the trial court and a first appeal under Section 96 CPC. The defendant filed a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, which the High Court dismissed summarily on the ground that no substantial …

N.V. SRINIVASA MURTHY AND ORS.versusMARIYAMMA (DEAD) BY PROPOSED LRS. AND ORS.

2005 INSC 284Dismissed

The appellants filed a suit in 1996 seeking a declaration of ownership and a permanent injunction over land allegedly transferred by a 1953 sale deed that they claimed was actually a loan secured by an oral agreement to reconvey the property upon repayment. They asserted that the loan was fully …

SHANTI PRASAD DEVI AND ANR.versusSHANKAR MAHTO AND ORS.

2005 INSC 285Dismissed

The lessee, Shanti Prasad Devi, held a petrol pump on premises leased for fifteen years and sought renewal after the lease expired, sending a notice and continuing to pay rent which the lessor accepted. The lease contained specific renewal clauses requiring the option to be exercised before expiry …

SURINDER SINGHversusKAPOOR SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

2005 INSC 245Dismissed

Surinder Singh, who owned half of a property with his sister, entered into a sale agreement with Kapur Singh claiming authority to sell his sister's share as well. The sister denied such authority, leading the respondents to sue for specific performance. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the …

UMABAI AND ANR.versusNILKANTH DHONDIBA CHAVAN BY LRS. AND ANR.

2005 INSC 203Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a transaction where the respondents sold a property to the appellants for Rs 45,000 and, on the same day, entered into an agreement for reconveyance of the same property upon payment of the same amount within seven to nine years. The respondents claimed the arrangement was a …

SUBHADRA RANI PAL CHOUDHARYversusSHEIRLY WEIGAL NAIN AND ORS.

2005 INSC 187Disposed off

The mother bequeathed two properties to her daughters, Subhadra Rani Pal Choudhary and Jyotsnamayee Pal Choudhary, who obtained probate. The brothers appealed; during pendency the sisters were appointed administrators‑cum‑joint receivers and were permitted by the Calcutta High Court to lease the …

SHANMUGHASUNDARAM AND ORS.versusDIRAVIA NADAR (D) BY LRS. AND ANR.

2005 INSC 133Dismissed

Two brothers, who were co‑owners of inherited land with three sisters, entered into a sale agreement with the appellant and an arbitration agreement to fix the price. The first arbitral award was set aside by the civil court on two grounds: breach of natural justice and the fact that the sisters, …

NARENDER SINGHversusJAI BHAGWAN AND ORS.

2004 INSC 705Dismissed

The father, a tenure‑holder, executed a sale agreement for agricultural lands that were part of a consolidation proceeding and were recorded solely in his name. The plaintiff sued for specific performance, while the father (deceased) and his sons argued that the father could not sell the entire land …

KUMAR DHIRENDRA MULLICK AND ORS.versusTIVOLI PARK APARTMENTS (P) LTD.

2004 INSC 629Dismissed

The trustees of a trust estate had leased premises to a lessee for 21 years, who later assigned the lease to TIVOLI PARK APARTMENTS (the respondent). An oral agreement was made to renew the lease for 70 years on increased rent and premium, but the trustees failed to execute the transfer deed. The …

SARGUNAM (D) BY LR.versusCHIDAMBARAM AND ANR.

2004 INSC 586Dismissed

The plaintiff, Chidambaram, entered into a sale agreement on 14‑June‑1979 to purchase a premises, but the vendor failed to deliver title. While the suit for specific performance was pending, the vendor purportedly sold the same property to Sargunam on 29‑Nov‑1979, allegedly under a prior agreement …

SMT. SWARNAM RAMACHANDRAN AND ANR.versusARAVACODE CHAKUNGAL JAYAPALAN

2004 INSC 476Dismissed

The vendors (appellants) entered into a sale agreement for land with a bungalow, requiring payment of the purchase price in instalments. The purchaser (respondent) paid part of the consideration but missed the stipulated deadline for a later instalment. The vendors claimed that time was of the …

SHAMSU SUHARA BEEVIversusG. ALEX AND ANR.

2004 INSC 461Disposed off

The appellant, Shamsu Suhara Beevi, entered into a sale agreement with the respondents, G. Alex and others, but failed to execute the deed. The respondents sued for specific performance; the trial court ordered them to deposit the balance sale consideration and directed the appellant to register the …

SUDHIR JAGGI AND ANR.versusSUNIL AKASH SINHA CHOUDHURY AND ORS.

2004 INSC 439Dismissed

The plaintiff, the executors of P.K. Chowdhury, purchased two flats from the developer and, after a variation of the agreement, was handed possession of the incomplete flats in May 1967, with the keys and authority to construct permanent partitions, doors and windows at his own cost. The plaintiff …

P. D'SOUZAversusSHONDRILO NAIDU

2004 INSC 408Dismissed

The plaintiff, P. D'Souza, sued Shondrilo Naidu for specific performance of a sale agreement in which the parties were to exchange a building for a fixed price by 5‑Dec‑1978. The defendant had mortgaged the property, failed to produce original title documents and did not redeem the mortgage, thereby …

HPA INTERNATIONALversusBHAGWANDAS FATEH CHAND DASWANI AND ORS.

2004 INSC 395Dismissed

The vendor, a life tenant of a property, entered into a sale agreement with HPA International to sell his life interest and the reversionary interest of the remaindermen, subject to obtaining a High Court sanction. The sanction suit was opposed by the reversioners and, after two years of delay, the …

STATE OF HARYANAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2004 INSC 390

The Supreme Court upheld a 2002 decree that mandated the State of Punjab to complete the Sutlej‑Yamuna Link (SYL) canal within one year, directing the Union of India to intervene if Punjab failed. Punjab’s subsequent suit challenging the decree, the constitutionality of Section 78 of the Punjab …

PUKHRAJ D. JAIN AND ORS.versusG. GOPALAKRISHNA

2004 INSC 281Appeal(s) allowed

The original owners of a residential building executed an agreement to sell the property to Dr. Gopalakrishna in 1974 and received an advance, but Gopalakrishna later rescinded the contract and sued for recovery of the advance. He subsequently sought to amend his suit for specific performance, which …

SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY AND ORS.versusGULBAHAR SHEIKH AND ORS.

2004 INSC 226Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellants filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 seeking recovery of possession of immovable property from which they claimed to have been dispossessed. The trial court decreed in their favour, but the respondents filed a revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil …

HARDESH ORES PVT. LTD.versusTIMBLO MINERALS PVT. LTD.,AND ORS.

2004 INSC 175Case Partly allowed

The dispute concerned the exclusive right to operate an iron‑ore mine. Hardesh Ores (the old contractor) claimed that its contract with the mining‑lease owner had been renewed by the parties' conduct, while Timbolo Minerals (the new contractors) asserted that the owner had refused renewal and …

SOPAN SUKHDEO SABLE AND ORS.versusASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

2004 INSC 56Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, Sopan Sukhdeo Sable and others, filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that they were tenants of properties owned by the Shaneshwar Deosthan Trust, alleging forcible eviction and claiming injunction, compensation and other reliefs. The trial court dismissed the suit under Order VII …

M/S. PEARLITE LINERS PVT. LTD.versusMANORAMA SIRSI

2004 INSC 21Appeal(s) allowed

Pearlite Liners Pvt Ltd. transferred the respondent, a trainee accountant later promoted, from its head office to a sales office. The employee refused to comply, was absent, and a chargesheet was issued. She filed a suit seeking a declaration that the transfer order was void, that she remained in …

SHYAM SINGHversusDARYAO SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 649Appeal(s) allowed

Shyam Singh filed a suit for specific performance of a 1971 agreement of repurchase of land against Daryao Singh (deceased) and other respondents. The trial court and appellate courts dismissed the suit, holding that the right of repurchase was a personal right of the original sellers (defendants …

ASHAN DEVI AND ANRversusPHULWASI DEVI AND ORS.

2003 INSC 652Appeal(s) allowed

The decree holder obtained an ex‑parte decree for specific performance of a sale agreement concerning vacant land and executed the decree, taking possession through a court nazar. The objectors, who had earlier purchased the same land and had municipal mutation, filed an application under Order XXI …

M.S. MADHUSOODHANAN AND ANR.versusKERALA KAUMUDI PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 361Disposed off

The case involved a family dispute over the control of Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd., focusing on the validity of share transfers from Mani and his children to M.S. Madhusoodhanan, the removal of Madhusoodhanan as Managing Director and the deletion of Article 74, the allotment of additional shares to …

DWARKA PRASAD AGARWAL (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ANR.versusRAMESH CHANDRA AGARWAL AND ORS.

2003 INSC 301Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a dispute between the heirs of the late Dwarka Prasad Agarwal and his partner Ramesh Chandra Agarwal over control of the printing press and newspaper business of Dainik Bhaskar. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal allegedly forged a lease, altered the partnership settlement, and took forcible …

RAMESH CHAND ARDAWATIYAversusANIL PANJWANI

2003 INSC 276Case Partly allowed

Anil Panjwani purchased a vacant plot from Shri Niwas Vaidhya under a sale agreement dated 1‑Dec‑1985 and took possession, erecting a boundary wall. The defendant, R.C. Ardawatiya, later attempted to erect a hut on the plot. Panjwani sued for declaration of title, restoration of possession and …

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANKversusINDIAN BANK AND ANR.

2003 INSC 249Appeal(s) allowed

Punjab National Bank (PNB) sued Indian Bank and Indo‑Europe Foods Ltd for recovery of a US‑dollar bank guarantee amounting to USD 5,237,284.54. The plaint sought a decree in US dollars with rupee equivalents for court‑fee and jurisdiction purposes. PNB later applied to amend the pleading to delete …

MANJUNATH ANANDAPPA URF. SHIVAPPA HANASIversusTAMMANASA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 177Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff entered into an agreement of sale on 1 Oct 1978 with the owner of a suit property, paying Rs 20,000 of the Rs 30,000 price and agreeing to pay the balance and obtain a registered deed within three years. The owner later sold the property to the appellant on 15 May 1984. The plaintiff …

BANARSI AND ORS.versusRAM PHAL

2003 INSC 94Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent Ram Phal sued for specific performance of a land sale agreement, while the appellants Banarsi et al. sued to cancel the agreement claiming it was a loan. The trial court denied specific performance, granting only a money decree and a conditional order for specific performance if the …

M.V. SHANKAR BHAI AND ANR.versusCLAUDE PINTO (SINCE DECEASED) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 91Dismissed

The testator Claude Pinto executed a will appointing his son as executor to sell a property and distribute the proceeds, while also allowing the legatees to seek partition. The executor entered into a sale agreement with the tenant, M.V. Shankar Bhoi, which contained a clause that the sale was …

B.L. SREEDHAR AND ORS.versusK.M. MUNIREDDY (DEAD) AND ORS.

2002 INSC 518Dismissed

The case concerned service‑inam lands that were originally attached to a hereditary village office. After the Mysore Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961, the lands were resumed and re‑granted to the plaintiff and his son, who later consented to a re‑grant in favour of his son (defendant No.3). …

LALIT KUMAR JAIN AND ANR.versusJAIPUR TRADERS CORPORATION PVT. LTD.

2002 INSC 229Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Jaipur Traders Corp. Pvt. Ltd., executed a sale deed for an oil mill and received an initial payment, but the balance consideration was withheld pending income‑tax clearance. The parties entered into a written settlement with a director that deferred the balance payment until all …

S.R EJAZversusTAMIL NADU HANDLOOM WEAVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.

2002 INSC 100Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a long‑time tenant, was forcibly evicted by the respondent landlord while an eviction suit was pending. The appellant filed a criminal complaint and, within six months, instituted a suit for restoration of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The trial court …

V. MUTHUSAMI (DEAD) BY LRSversusANGAMMAL AND ORS.

2002 INSC 101Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, V. Muthusami (deceased), sued for specific performance of a sale agreement concerning a suit land, asserting that Angammal, a widow, had full ownership of the land. The court examined whether Angammal possessed a pre‑existing right of maintenance under Hindu law, which would give her …

P. PURUSHOTTAM REDDY AND ANR.versusM/S PRATAP STEELS LTD.

2002 INSC 38Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants (vendors) entered into a sale agreement with the respondent (buyer) for Rs.40.25 lakh, conditioning the sale on obtaining clearance under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 by a stipulated date. When the clearance was not obtained, the vendors cancelled the agreement …

ASHOK NAGAR WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ANR.versusR.K. SHARMA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 610Dismissed

The Ashok Nagar Welfare Association filed suits under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act seeking possession of land allegedly occupied unlawfully by the respondents. A Single Judge of the Delhi High Court passed ex‑parte decrees on the basis that summons were served, although the summons were …

ADCON ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.versusDAULAT AND ANR.

2001 INSC 439Dismissed

The appellant, a seller of a land‑and‑building, executed an agreement and memorandum to sell the property to the respondents. The respondents filed a suit under clause 12 of the Letters Patent of the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration of the agreement’s validity and specific performance of the …

RACHAKONDA NARAYANAversusPONTHALA PARVATHAMMA AND ANR.

2001 INSC 390Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff entered into an agreement to purchase two plots of land, paying earnest money, but later learned that the seller lacked title to one plot (Plot B). The plaintiff sought specific performance of the contract for the remaining plot (Plot A) after relinquishing any claim to Plot B and …

A.C. ARULAPPAN .versusSMT. AHALYA NAIK

2001 INSC 355Disposed off

The appellant, A.C. Arulappan, entered into a sale agreement with the respondent, Smt. Ahalya Naik, for his RCC building, receiving an advance of Rs.42,000. A second agreement was later executed stipulating a deadline for execution of the sale deed, which the appellant failed to meet. The respondent …

V. PECHIMUTHUversusGOWRAMMAL

2001 INSC 332Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, who had sold his immovable property to the respondent, later entered into a written agreement whereby the respondent would sell the property back to him after five years for a specified sum. After the period elapsed, the appellant demanded reconveyance, but the respondent refused, …

STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRAversusP. N. B.

2001 INSC 230Disposed off

State Bank of Saurashtra sold UTI units to P.N.B. and received payment of about Rs 102.65 crore, but failed to deliver the units. P.N.B. sued for specific performance and damages. The Special Court ordered the bank to purchase the units from the open market and deliver them. On appeal, the Supreme …

BABU KHAN AND ORS.versusNAZIM KHAN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 209Case Allowed

The appellants, pucca tenants, filed an application under Section 91 of the Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950 seeking reinstatement after being dispossessed, but the revenue authorities dismissed their claim. They subsequently filed a civil suit for declaration of title and …

RAM SAHAN RAIversusSACHIV SAMANAYA PRABANDHAK AND ANR.

2001 INSC 101Disposed off

The appellant, a clerk of a District Cooperative Bank, was dismissed without a charge‑sheet, show‑cause notice or hearing. He filed a suit seeking a declaration that the dismissal was illegal and that he should be reinstated with consequential benefits. The lower appellate court held the dismissal …

GOBIND RAMversusGIAN CHAND

2000 INSC 463Dismissed

Gobindram (appellant) agreed to sell a property in Lajpat Nagar to Gian Chand (respondent) for Rs 16,000, receiving Rs 1,000 as earnest money. The sale deed was not executed within the stipulated time, prompting the respondent to sue for specific performance. The trial court decreed specific …

SURJIT KAURversusNAURATA SINGH AND ANR.

2000 INSC 444Disposed off

Surjit Kaur entered into an agreement to sell her land to Naurata Singh, receiving Rs 20,000 as advance, with the condition that mutation and possession be delivered before execution of the sale deed by 30 June 1981. A suit filed by a third party obtained an interim injunction restraining …

AJAIB SINGH AND ORS.versusSMT. TULSI DEVI

2000 INSC 372Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned an agreement whereby the plaintiff, Tulsi Devi, agreed to purchase part of a government‑allotted property (Block 67‑B) and, upon repayment of a loan, acquire the remaining part (Block 67‑A). The plaintiff claimed specific performance of the agreement to obtain Block 67‑A, …

RAM NIWAS (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusSMT. BANO AND ORS.

2000 INSC 367Dismissed

The appellant, a tenant, entered into an agreement to purchase a shop from the vendor for Rs.9,200 and paid part of the price. The vendor later sold the shop to purchasers for Rs.20,000. The appellant sued for specific performance of the original agreement against both the vendor and the purchasers. …

MOTILAL JAINversusSMT. RAMDASI DEVI AND ORS.

2000 INSC 343Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff entered into a contract to purchase a property for Rs.25,000, paying Rs.17,000 at execution and agreeing to pay the remaining Rs.8,000 within five months at the time of execution of the sale deed. The defendant refused to accept the balance and to execute the deed. After three legal …

R.K. MOHAMMED UBAIDULLAH AND ORS.versusHAJEE C. ABDUL WAHAB (DEAD) BY LRS.

2000 INSC 338Dismissed

The plaintiff entered into a sale agreement with the first defendant on 27 July 1971 for a godown, paying an advance and agreeing that the sale deed would be executed within 90 days. The first defendant reneged and sold the same property to defendants 2‑5 on 9 November 1971. The plaintiff sued for …

RAM AWADH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusACHHAIBAR DUBEY AND ANR.

2000 INSC 43Appeal(s) allowed

Bachna filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property but did not initially plead that she was ready and willing to perform her part of the contract; this plea was later added by amendment. The defendants were the legal representatives of a subsequent purchaser of the …

MUKESH KUMAR AND ORS.versusCOL. HARBANS WARAICH AND ORS.

1999 INSC 496Dismissed

The plaintiffs, Mukesh Kumar and others, entered into an agreement with the Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to purchase a property, but the sale deed was not executed. One of the original defendants, Ashwani Kumar, was later transposed from the defendant side to become a plaintiff. The trial …

SHRI MAHABIR PRASAD JAINversusSHRI GANGA SINGH

1999 INSC 454Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Ganga Singh, first obtained an injunction against M.P. Jain and the Municipal Corporation and later filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act seeking possession of a tuck‑shop premises. The trial court, despite finding that the respondent was not a tenant of the …