Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Specific Relief Act, 1963

479 judgments · newest first · showing 401–479

BALRAJ TANEJA AND ANR.versusSUNIL MADAN AND ANR.

1999 INSC 385Appeal(s) allowed

Balraj Taneja and others appealed against a Delhi High Court decree granting specific performance to Sunil Madan. The High Court had passed the decree under Order 8 Rule 10 of the CPC solely because the defendants failed to file a written statement, without examining a material factual dispute …

RAM KUMAR AGGARWAL AND ANR.versusTHAWAR DAS (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

1999 INSC 346Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two civil appeals arising from a dispute over a 1956 agreement to sell land and rent it, where the plaintiff sought specific performance. The High Court had set aside the trial and district court judgments, dismissed the plaintiff's suit for ejectment and decreed specific …

SYED DASTAGIRversusT.R. GOPALAKRISHNA SETTY

1999 INSC 317Appeal(s) allowed

Syed Dastagir entered into a sale agreement with T.R. Gopalakrishna Setty for Rs.9,500, paying most of the consideration but the defendant refused to accept the remaining Rs.120 and execute the sale deed. The plaintiff deposited the balance in court and sued for specific performance. The trial court …

KALAVAKURTI VENKATA SUBBAIAHversusBALA GURAPPAGARI GURVI REDDY

1999 INSC 309Dismissed

The appellant executed a sale deed in favour of the respondent but refused to cooperate for its registration. The respondent filed a suit for specific performance seeking registration of the deed, along with injunction or possession of the immovable property. The trial court held that the suit was …

K.NARENDRAversusRIVIERA APARTMENTS (P) LTD.

1999 INSC 265Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K. Narendra, entered into a 1972 agreement to sell a 4,000 sq m plot to Riviera Apartments (P) Ltd for Rs 8,97,740, contingent on the buyer obtaining various governmental sanctions for a multi‑storey project. The buyer failed to secure the required approvals, part of the land was …

OLYMPUS SUPERSTRUCTURES PVT. LTD.versusMEENA VIJAY KHETAN AND ORS.

1999 INSC 240Dismissed

Olympus Superstructures Pvt. Ltd. entered into three main sale agreements for flats and three separate interior design agreements, each containing arbitration clauses. Disputes arose over payment, construction progress and interior work, and a sole arbitrator was appointed under the main agreements. …

V.S. PALANICHAMY CHEITIAR FIRMversusC. ALAGAPPAN AND ANR.

1999 INSC 36Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a vendor, sold two plots of land to the respondents in 1980. The respondents sued for specific performance; the trial court decreed performance, directing the respondents to deposit the balance price by March 31, 1983, and the vendor to execute sale deeds. After the decree became …

GANESH SHETversusDR. C.S.G.K. SETTY AND ORS.

1998 INSC 244Dismissed

The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged sale agreement of a Shimoga property, claiming the contract was concluded on 25‑January‑1984 in Delhi. The defendants denied any concluded contract, stating that price and terms were never fixed and that no agreement was reached on …

ASHOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.

1998 INSC 199Dismissed

A.K. Srivastav was appointed as a probationary Inspector with National Insurance Company Ltd. on conditions that he achieve a premium target within twelve months, failing which his service could be terminated without notice. After failing to meet the target, the company served a notice of …

TIRUMALA TRIUPATI DEVASTHANAMSversusK.M. KRISHNALAH

1998 INSC 121Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, K.M. Krishnah, sued Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) for a permanent injunction over 2.29 acres of land. The trial court dismissed the suit for lack of title and possession; the plaintiff later amended the suit to seek possession after being dispossessed on 30 August 1969, filing …

SHRI LAKHI RAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusSHRI TRIKHA RAM AND ORS.

1998 INSC 71Appeal(s) allowed

Lakshmi Ram (deceased) had an agreement with vendor Trikha Ram to sell land for a consideration, but the vendor sold the property to subsequent purchasers. Lakshmi Ram filed a suit for specific performance which was decreed by the trial court. On appeal, the defendants argued that the suit was …

INDIAN BANKversusK. USHA AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1998 INSC 42

The Bank of Thanjavur was amalgamated with Indian Bank under a Scheme of Amalgamation framed pursuant to Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The heirs of employees who died while in service of the transferor bank claimed compassionate appointments based on a 1982 settlement entered into …

SMT. BJSMILLAH BEGUM (DEAD) BY LRSversusRAHMATULLAH KHAN (DEAD) BY LRS

1998 INSC 34Dismissed

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff, had sold a property to the deceased defendant on 8 February 1955 and simultaneously obtained an agreement of reconveyance that allowed the plaintiff to regain the property if she repaid the consideration within three years. A suit for …

STATE OF M.P.versusMANGI LAL SHARMA

1997 INSC 829Appeal(s) allowed

Mangi Lal Sharma, a clerk in the Madhya Pradesh Irrigation Department, resigned after a denied transfer request and remained absent for over five years, leading the State to treat his service as terminated. He filed a suit under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act for a declaration that he …

VINITA M. KHANOLKARversusPRAGNA M. PAI AND ORS.

1997 INSC 771Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned an appeal to the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court against an order dated 15 November 1994 passed by a Single Judge in a suit for dispossession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. The respondents argued that Section 6(3) of the Act barred any appeal or revision …

HABIBA KHATOONversusUBAIDUL HUQ AND ORS.

1997 INSC 595Dismissed

The case concerned a house sold by Smt. Amir Jehan Begam to Shakir Ahmad Khan, who executed an Agreement of Reconveyance granting the vendor a right to repurchase the property within three years. Shakir transferred his interest to the appellant, while the vendor’s son, Irfan Hasan Khan, later …

SHRI SHIVJIversusSHRI RAGHUNATH (DEAD) AND ORS.

1997 INSC 170Dismissed

The deceased respondent and Smt. Reshambai jointly purchased 9 acres of land. Reshambai executed an agreement of sale in favour of the appellant, promising to convey her share to the respondent, but later refused to execute the deed, alleging fraud and that the agreement was void under the rule …

MD. ALIMUDDINversusWAIZUDDIN AND ANR.

1997 INSC 159Dismissed

The case concerned a decree for specific performance granted in 1982, which became final after the Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition. The trial court had directed the respondents to deposit Rs. 500 and execute a sale deed by June 7, 1982, and later extended the time for compliance on …

BIBI JAIBUNISHAversusJAGDISH PANDIT AND ORS.

1997 INSC 128Appeal(s) allowed

Bibi Jaibunisha sold a property to Jagdish Pandit by a registered conveyance dated 21‑02‑1969, which included an agreement that the property would be reconveyed for Rs 4,000. She filed a suit for specific performance of reconveyance on 07‑04‑1975. The trial court and the Patna High Court dismissed …

K.S. VIDYANADAM AND ORS.versusVAIRAVAN

1997 INSC 120Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff K.S. Vidyanadam entered into a sale agreement on 15‑December‑1978 to purchase a house for Rs.60,000, paying only Rs.5,000 as earnest money and agreeing to complete the purchase within six months. He failed to purchase stamp papers, pay the balance or demand execution of the sale deed …

BEHARILAL AND ANR.versusSMT. BHURI DEVI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1439Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Government’s Mandi Committee allotted two plots to Beharilal in 1953, issued a patta and delivered possession in 1954. After the patta was cancelled in 1956, the same plots were re‑allotted to Ram Gopal (husband of Bhuri Devi) and possession was handed over to him. Criminal proceedings …

WALTER LOUIS FRANKLIN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusGEORGE SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

1996 INSC 1399Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Walter Louis Franklin, purchased plot No. 15/45 from a church in 1937 and had been in possession, using it for poultry farming and occasional sleeping. He filed a suit for perpetual injunction under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, to restrain the respondent, George Singh, …

NIVARTI GOVIND INGALE AND ORS.versusRAVANAGOUDA BHIMANGOUDA PATIL

1996 INSC 1324Appeal(s) allowed

Radhabai, the mother of the appellants, owned a parcel of land and obtained a loan from the respondent's father on the condition that she execute a sale deed in the name of his minor son, accompanied by an agreement of reconveyance. After receiving the loan, the father failed to execute the …

NAHAR SINGHversusHARNAK SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1245Dismissed

The appellant entered into an agreement of sale for immovable land that was described only in vague terms, lacking exact area, boundaries, and khasra numbers. The trial court granted specific performance without examining the identifiability of the property. On appeal, the lower appellate court held …

M/S ANAMALLAI CLUBversusTHE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1208Disposed off

The Anamalai Club held a licence for 28.70 acres of government land for sports and recreation. The State of Tamil Nadu terminated the licence under Section 3 of the Government Grants Act, 1895 and resumed possession with police assistance on the same day, without issuing a notice under the Tamil …

YESHODA AND ANR.versusK. NAGARAJAN

1996 INSC 1106Dismissed

In a suit for specific performance, the trial court passed a conditional decree requiring the respondent to deposit Rs.1,80,000 by 21 April 1994. The Karnataka High Court, on the respondent’s application, extended the time by three months. The petitioners then filed an application under Section 28 …

REVAPPA GURUSIDDAPPAversusTHAKUBAI MADHAVARAO PATIL AND ORS.

1996 INSC 996Dismissed

The first respondent entered into an agreement on 11 March 1983 to purchase 3 acres 28 gunthas of land for Rs.12,000, paying Rs.2,000 as earnest money. The petitioner‑second defendant subsequently bought the same land on 8 July 1983 for Rs.6,000 and registered the sale deed. The first respondent …

LOURDU MARI DAVID AND ORS.versusLOUIS CHINNAYA AROGIASWAMY AND ORS.

1996 INSC 866Dismissed

Petitioners filed a suit for specific performance of a 1976 sale agreement for two doors, claiming they had paid part consideration and were ready to perform, while respondents 1 and 2 delayed execution. The trial court found breach by respondents but denied specific performance, holding that …

KALLATHIL SREEDHARAN AND ANR.versusKOMATH PANDYALA PRASANNA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 852Dismissed

In a partition suit, a cinema theatre was allotted to a woman and her minor son subject to payment of Rs.1,55,000 each. Unable to pay, the theatre was auctioned. The appellant advanced Rs.2,10,391 to the woman to set aside the sale, on the condition that she would sell the theatre to him for …

RAMESHWAR DUBEY AND ORS.versusMASOMAT ASHA KAUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 825Dismissed

Rameshwar Dubey and others filed a suit on 15 February 1973 under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act seeking declaration that two sale deeds (dated 12 July 1966 and 14 December 1970) were void because fraud had been perpetrated on the plaintiff. The trial court and the Patna High Court held that …

PIRTHI @ SANS! ETC.versusJATI RAM AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 804Dismissed

Petitioner Pirthi@ Sansi entered into an agreement on 6 May 1988 to sell agricultural land to Respondent No.1 and received part payment. Respondent No.1 filed a suit for specific performance in 1993, which the trial court decreed in his favour. On appeal, the Additional District Judge set aside the …

SUKHBIR SINGH AND ORS.versusBRIJ PAL SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 687Dismissed

The first petitioner purchased land from the respondent under a 1975 sale deed that included a reconveyance agreement. The respondent sued for specific performance, alleging the petitioner refused to execute the sale deed despite the respondent’s readiness and attendance at the Sub‑Registrar’s …

HIS HOLINESS ACHARYA SWAMI GANESH DASSJIversusSH. SITA RAM THAPAR

1996 INSC 590Dismissed

Acharya Swami Ganesh Dassji entered into a contract on 27 February 1975 to purchase a 500‑sq‑yd plot in Delhi from Sita Ram Thapar, with the agreement that the draft sale deed be finalised and registered within seven days, making time of the essence. The seller required cash payment for the …

SRI SAMIR SOBHAN SANYALversusTRACKS TRADE PRIVATE LTD. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 534Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, S. S. Sanyal, was occupying premises as a tenant of India Foils Ltd. when the landlady sold the property to Habitat Developers, who obtained a decree for specific performance and possession. Although the decree was against the landlady, the appellant was not impleaded nor was any …

M/S P.R. DEB AND ASSOCIATESversusSUNANDA ROY

1996 INSC 347Disposed off

The appellant, owner of a plot in South Calcutta, entered into a sale agreement with the respondent for Rs 9 lakhs, requiring an initial payment of Rs 25,000 and a further Rs 4 lakhs within five months, the latter being essential for the appellant to obtain alternative accommodation. The respondent …

BABULALversusRAJ KUMAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 274Appeal(s) allowed

Babulal obtained a decree for specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property, but the decree did not grant possession. When the decree‑holder sought to execute the decree, Raj Kumar (the appellant), who was not a party to the decree, claimed a right in the property and obtained an …

MD. NOORUL HODAversusBIBI RAIFUNNISA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 821Dismissed

The petitioner, MD Noorul Hoda, bought land benami in the name of his brother‑in‑law Rafique on 1 December 1959. Respondents obtained a partition decree (preliminary decree 22 January 1973, final decree 9 February 1974) allocating the land to Bibi Raifunnisa. The petitioner later obtained a second …

COMMISSIONER_ OF INCOME TAX, KANPURversusKAMLA TOWN TRUST

1995 INSC 741Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two tax disputes. In Commissioner of Income Tax, Kanpur v. Kamla Town Trust, a trust created in 1941 for workers’ housing was rectified in 1945 and 1955; the Court held that the 1945 deed did not create a public charitable trust, denying exemption for 1949‑55, but the 1955 …

MUNI LALversusTHE ORIENTAL FIRE AND GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR.

1995 INSC 709Dismissed

Muni Lal insured his truck with Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company and lost it in October 1983 due to the driver’s misfeasance. He filed a suit in 1986 seeking only a declaration that he was entitled to the insured amount, omitting any claim for monetary compensation. The trial court …

R.V. BHUPAL PRASADversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 455Dismissed

The appellant, R.V. Bhupal Prasad, held a cinema theatre under a 20‑year lease that expired in 1983. He applied for renewal of his cinema licence under the Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulations) Rules, 1970, but the landlady (Respondent No.3) objected, claiming his possession was not lawful. The …

M/S. GUJARAT BOTTLING COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.versusTHE COCA COLA CO. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 441Dismissed

Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd (GBC) entered into a 1993 licence agreement with Coca Cola to bottle and distribute beverages under several trade marks, which included a negative covenant prohibiting GBC from dealing in competing products during the agreement's term. A subsequent 1994 agreement, intended …

N.P. THIRUGNANAM (D) BY L.RS.versusDR. R. JAGAN MOHAN RAO AND ORS.

1995 INSC 394Dismissed

The plaintiff N.P. Thirugnanam had entered into a sale agreement for a property and paid a small advance, thereafter taking possession as a tenant. He sued for specific performance, alleging the defendants had refused to execute the sale deed, while the defendants contended that the plaintiff had …

NAGAR PALIKA, JINDversusJAGAT.SINGH, ADVOCATE

1995 INSC 223Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Committee of Jind appealed against a suit filed by Jagat Singh for a permanent injunction restraining the Committee from interfering with his claimed ownership and possession of five kanals of land. Jagat Singh relied solely on revenue records and a mutation entry, without producing a …

S. RANGARAJU NAIDUversusS. THIRUVARAKKARASU.

1995 INSC 176Disposed off

The appellant borrowed Rs.35,500 from the respondent and his brother, paid Rs.20,000 and executed a promissory note for the balance of Rs.15,500 with 9% interest. On the same day he also executed an agreement to sell three plots of land for the same amount, intending the sale to discharge the note. …

MANSUKHLAL DHANRAJ JAIN AND ORS. ETC.versusEKNATH VITHAL OGALE ETC.

1995 INSC 106Dismissed

The appellants, licensees of certain premises in Greater Bombay, filed suits for permanent injunction in the City Civil Court to prevent the licensor‑defendants from forcibly evicting them. The defendants challenged the City Civil Court’s jurisdiction, arguing that under Section 41(1) of the …

JUGRAJ SINGH AND ANR.versusLABH SINGH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 557Dismissed

The plaintiffs, Labh Singh and his brother, sued for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 30‑8‑1984 against the original vendor, Jasbir Singh. The petitioners, who had purchased the property later on 4‑1‑1985, were impleaded as necessary parties. All lower courts held that the petitioners …

ANIL KUMAR SINGHversusSHIVNA TH MISHRA @ GADASU GURU

1994 INSC 485Dismissed

Daulat Singh filed a suit for specific performance of a land sale; he died and his son continued as legal representative. The plaintiff sought to amend the plaint to implead Shivnath Mishra, alleging Mishra had become a co‑owner of the land by a decree under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land …

PREMJI RATANSEY SHAH AND ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 279Dismissed

The petitioners claimed to be successors in title to land that had been acquired by the government for the railways under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and sought a declaration and an injunction to protect their possession. The trial court found them in possession, but the High Court held that the …

SARDAR SINGHversusSMT. KRISHNA DEVI AND ANR.

1994 INSC 172

Sardar Singh claimed a half‑share in a house purchased by his brother Kartar Lal, which was later sold by Kartar Lal to Joginder Nath (respondent). A private arbitration award declared that both brothers were co‑owners, each holding an equal share, but the award was not registered. The respondent …

RAMANKUTTY GUPTANversusAVARA

1994 INSC 42

The appellant, a vendor, sought rescission of a contract of sale under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, alleging the respondent failed to pay the balance consideration within the time fixed by an appellate decree for specific performance. The decree, passed by the appellate court, was …

SMT DEOKABAIversusUTTAM

1993 INSC 247Appeal(s) allowed

Deokabai, an elderly widow, entered into a written agreement to sell a portion of her house to Uttam, subject to obtaining permission from the competent authority and, thereafter, securing another suitable house before the sale deed could be executed. After permission was granted, Uttam demanded …

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusBRIGADIER SUKHJIT SINGH

1993 INSC 215Dismissed

The dispute concerned a double‑storeyed building within the Jallowkhana complex at Kapurthala, occupied by the Punjab Public Works Department. Brigadier Sukhjit Singh, a heir‑apparent of the erstwhile Maharaja, claimed ownership based on a 1925 farman that vested the entire complex in each …

T.M. BALAKRISHNA MUDALIARversusM. SATY ANARA YANA RAO AND OTHERS

1993 INSC 136Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, T.M. Balakrishna Mudaliar, purchased agricultural lands from Abdul Salam and Razia Begum and was assigned their right of repurchase under agreements dated 15‑April‑1963. The respondents, Satyanarayana Rao and his mother Pushpavathi Ammal, refused to execute reconveyance deeds, …

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK LTD.versusCALCUTTA STEEL CO. AND ORS.

1992 INSC 355Appeal(s) allowed

The Calcutta Steel Co. (CSC) obtained a licence to import steel billets and, to reduce the end‑user's financial burden, opened an irrevocable Letter of Credit directly with the foreign supplier, though the name of the canalising agency MMTC was shown for exchange‑control purposes. Bills of exchange …

SMT. THAKAMMA MATHEWversusM. AZAMATHULLA KHAN AND ORS.

[1992] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 544Appeal(s) allowed

Smt. Thakamma Mathew sold a property to M. Azmathulla Khan and later cancelled the agreement when the sale was not completed by the stipulated date. She sued for cancellation, possession and damages. The trial court cancelled the agreement and ordered restitution and damages. The Karnataka High …

JAGDISH SINGHversusNATTHU SINGH

1991 INSC 315Modified

Jagdish Singh appealed a High Court decree that ordered specific performance of a reconveyance agreement with Natthu Singh. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court could re‑appraise evidence in a second appeal, whether unserved notices were deemed served, and whether compensation could …

NANDGANJ SIHORI SUGAR CO. LTD., RAE BARELIversusBADRI NATH DIXIT AND ORS.

1991 INSC 111Appeal(s) allowed

Badri Nath Dixit sued Nandganj Sihori Sugar Co. Ltd. and its officers for a mandatory injunction to enforce an alleged contract appointing him as Instrumentation Foreman, relying on letters from the holding company's chairman that purportedly promised his appointment under a Government scheme. The …

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.versusAMRITSAR GAS SERVICE AND ORS.

1990 INSC 360

Indian Oil Corporation (the appellant) terminated a distributorship agreement with Amritsar Gas Service (respondent No.1) under clause 27, alleging unauthorized connections and other misconduct. The distributor sued for a declaration that the termination was illegal and sought restoration of the …

RAJ KUMAR RAJINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 209Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the second son of the former Raja of Bushahr, claimed ownership of about 1,720 acres of forest land based on a 1942 patta and subsequent grants by his father, the Raja. The State argued that the 1942 lease of the forests to the Punjab Government divested the Raja of any right to grant …

GAJANAN JAIKISHAN JOSHIversusPRABHAKAR MOHANLAL KALWAR

1989 INSC 383Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant had paid part consideration for a property and was given possession, but the respondent failed to execute the registered sale deed as agreed. The appellant sued for specific performance, but the plaint omitted an averment that he was ready and willing to perform his part, which is …

JITENDRA NATH BISWASversusEMPIRE OF INDIA & CEYLONE TEA CO. & ANR.

1989 INSC 221Dismissed

Jitendra Nath Biswas, an employee of Empire of India & Ceylon Tea Co., was dismissed after a domestic enquiry for alleged misconduct. He filed a civil suit in the Munsiff Court seeking reinstatement, back wages and an injunction against the dismissal. The respondents contended that such relief was …

SMT. ANNAPOORANI AMMALversusG. THANGAPALAM

1989 INSC 159Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant purchased a property by a registered sale deed in 1950 and the respondent entered into a rent agreement with her in 1951. In 1974 the respondent sued for conveyance of the property based on an alleged handwritten 'yadast' by the appellant's mother, which was unstamped, unregistered and …

OM PRAKASHversusAMARJIT SINGH & ANR.

1988 INSC 217Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Om Prakash, was placed ex parte in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a small piece of land. He filed several applications to set aside the ex parte order, but they were dismissed as unsigned or time‑barred. The trial court decreed specific performance based on …

SUSHIL KUMAR & ANR.versusRAM PRAKASH & ORS.

1988 INSC 9Dismissed

Ram Prakash, the Karta of a Mitakshara joint Hindu family, executed an agreement to sell a house described as self‑acquired to Jai Bhagwan but later refused to execute the sale deed. Jai Bhagwan sued for specific performance; the sons of Ram Prakash, claiming the house to be coparcenary property, …

OIL & NATURAL GAS COMMISSIONversusWESTERN COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

1987 INSC 14Appeal(s) allowed

The Oil & Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) entered into a drilling contract with Western Company of North America that provided for arbitration under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 and the law of India, with hearings to be held in London. An umpire, after the arbitrators could not agree, issued an …

ROJASARA RAMJIBHAI DAHYABHAIversusJANI NAROTTAMDAS LALLUBHAI (DEAD) BY LRS. & ANR.

1986 INSC 70Dismissed

The appellant, an occupant of two plots of land, had earlier contracted to purchase the land from the former Girasdar, whose agreement required the Girasdar to obtain permission to convert the agricultural land into a village site before a sale deed could be executed. The appellant later entered …

A. L. KALRAversusTHE PROJECT & EQUIPMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

1984 INSC 97Appeal(s) allowed

A.L. Kalra, a former Deputy Finance Manager of the Project & Equipment Corporation of India Ltd., was disciplined for allegedly misusing two advances granted under the corporation's House Building and Conveyance Advance Rules. The corporation withheld his salary and, after a disciplinary inquiry …

SUDHIR CHANDRA SARKARversusTATA IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. AND OTHERS.

1984 INSC 69Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a permanent uncovenanted employee of Tata Iron & Steel Co., rendered 29 years of continuous service and resigned, thereby becoming eligible for retiring gratuity under the 1937 Retiring Gratuity Rules. The company refused payment, invoking Rule 10 which purported to give it absolute …

COTTON CORPORATION OF INDIAversusUNITED INDUSTRIAL BANK

1983 INSC 123Appeal(s) allowed

The United Industrial Bank sued the Cotton Corporation of India seeking a declaration that the bank’s branch manager lacked authority to co‑accept usance bills and also obtained an interim injunction restraining the corporation from filing a winding‑up petition against the bank. The Bombay High …

BABU LALversusHAZARI LAL KISHORI LAL & ORS.

1982 INSC 11Dismissed

Babu Lal purchased land from respondents 6‑9, which had earlier been agreed to be sold to respondents 1‑5. The latter sued for specific performance of their contract; the trial court dismissed, but the appellate courts decreed specific performance and ordered the sale deed to be executed in favour …

SUPERINTENDENCE COMPANY OF INDIA (P) LTD.versusKRISHAN MURGAI

1980 INSC 124Dismissed

The Superintendence Company employed the respondent as its New Delhi branch manager and inserted a clause prohibiting him from joining a competitor or starting a similar business for two years after he "leaves" the company. The company terminated his employment and he started a competing business. …

BAI DOSABAIversusMATHURDAS GOVINDDAS AND 0RS.

1980 INSC 91Dismissed

Bai Dosabhai, who had received two plots of land as a gift, executed a deed of lease in 1946 granting the lessee (Indu Prasad Dev Shankar Bhatt and successors) a right to purchase the land within seven years for a stipulated price, with provisions for rent, default, and sale by public auction. After …