Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Transfer of Property Act, 1872

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

NILESH NANDKUMAR SHAHversusSIKANDAR AZIZ PATEL

2002 INSC 34723 August 2002Dismissed

The landlord sought eviction of three tenants occupying tenements where each unit comprised a front commercial room and a rear residential room, filing suit under the Transfer of Property Act on the ground that the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging, House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Bombay Act) did not apply to dual‑purpose

SAMPURAN SINGH AND ORS.versusNIRANJAN KAUR AND ORS.

1999 INSC 7923 February 1999Dismissed

The appellants, SAMPURNAN SINGH and others, purchased land in 1959 that had been orally mortgaged in March 1893 for Rs. 53. The mortgagee rights were sold to the respondents on 11 January 1960. The appellants filed a suit in 1980 seeking possession by redemption, but the respondents contended the suit was barred by lim

K. BALAKRISHNANversusK. KAMALAM AND ORS.

2003 INSC 73718 December 2003Case Partly allowed

The mother executed a registered gift deed in 1945 transferring an 1/8 share of her property to her minor son and daughter, while reserving possession and enjoyment for herself during her lifetime. After the son attained majority, the mother cancelled the gift deed in 1970 and executed a will bequeathing the same prope

RAMNATH AGRAWAL & ORS.versusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 39513 May 2020Dismissed

In 1976 the Food Corporation of India (FCI) invited offers to construct godowns on private land and subsequently lease them. The appellants' offer was accepted and an agreement dated 16‑12‑1976 required them to build six godowns, after which FCI would take possession on lease, subject to a completion certificate and sa

SAMATHAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

[1997] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 30511 July 1997Disposed off

The case concerned the validity of mining leases granted by the State of Andhra Pradesh to non-tribal persons in scheduled areas, including reserved forests. The appellant, a society, challenged these leases as violating the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation, 1959, the Forest (Conservation) Act, 19

SURAIN SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusMEHENGA (DEAD) BY LRS.

1996 INSC 1641 February 1996Dismissed

The appellants challenged a sale deed dated 29 September 1959, alleging that it was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation and without consideration. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding the deed valid; the first appellate court reversed that finding, holding that adequate consideration had been paid and no fraud

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search