Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioner, a transgender individual nominated to the State Level DISHA Committee in Bihar, alleged threats to his life and sought police protection and implementation of Supreme Court guidelines from NALSA v. Union of India and the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. He cited …
Advocate Rajeeb Kalita filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing all States and Union Territories to provide separate, accessible toilet facilities for men, women, persons with disabilities and transgender persons in every court and tribunal. He highlighted …
The Supreme Court of India considered a batch of petitions seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, and other laws. The Court held that there is no fundamental right to marry under the Constitution, and the Special Marriage Act is not unconstitutional for …
