PRATHAMA BANK, HEAD OFFICE MORADABAD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANversusVIJAY KUMAR GOEL & ANR.
1989 INSC 25222 August 1989Disposed off
The respondent, an employee of Prathama Bank, was dismissed after a disciplinary inquiry in which he was not given adequate opportunity to examine the documents relied upon against him. He filed a suit challenging the validity of the inquiry and seeking reinstatement. The bank contended that the bank was not a "State" …
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.versusRAJMATI SINGH
2022 INSC 12617 December 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Rajmati Singh was appointed as an untrained assistant teacher in 1971 and was relieved in 1973 to undergo mandatory training, which she failed to complete, leading to the termination of her contractual employment in 1974. Over the next three decades she made repeated representations but never approached any judicial or…
STATE OF U.P.versusVIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI AND ANR.
1994 INSC 5817 December 1994Dismissed
The respondent, a member of the Uttar Pradesh Civil Services, was censured for allegedly pressurising carpet traders to support students protesting the reservation policy. He challenged the censure under Rule 55‑B(a) of the U.P. Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1930, which dispenses with formal…