Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
321 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
Hariom filed a writ petition challenging the Board of Revenue's order rejecting his application to transfer Appeal No. 1248 of 2020, which was pending before the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Saharanpur Division. The High Court stayed the appeal under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue …
The petitioner, through a public interest litigation, sought a writ directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to enforce an order under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which ordered eviction of encroachers from certain plots in Village Talhedi Buzurg. Although the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide a delay‑condonation application filed in Revision No. 2228 of 2026, which challenges an order of the Additional Commissioner under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The revision was filed belatedly …
The petitioners, Saroja Yadav and another, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Board of Revenue to decide Revision No.1061 of 2026 under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a time frame set by the court. They alleged that the revision filed by respondent No.5 was …
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents, including the Vice Chancellor of Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University and others, willfully defied an order dated 03‑09‑2026 in Writ‑B No.2190/2026 concerning a land dispute. The court observed that the respondents were not parties …
Mukesh Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus and prohibition to stop the Commissioner, Aligarh from proceeding with a land exchange alleged to be fraudulent and not in compliance with statutory procedures. The petitioner claimed that the exchange of a public utility …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a stay order dated 04‑02‑2026 that restrained demolition of structures on land covered by Criminal Revision No. 599 of 2026. The stay order related to Arazi No. 993 under Section 152 of the BNSS, 2023, while the applicants …
Petitioner Sita Ram filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue, Azamgarh) to decide the pending revenue case No. 3642 of 2024 within the time frame prescribed under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The State and the Gaon Sabha …
The petitioner, Rama, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing certain respondents to take action on alleged non-exchange of specific land parcels in Mau district. The court noted that the grievance falls under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which …
The petitioner, Govind, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent (a revenue authority) to decide Revision No. 136 of 2025 (Narayan v. Govind) under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the revision, pending since 2025, had been repeatedly …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No.55, recorded as Banjar land, after a revenue order under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 ordered eviction on 5 February 2025 but was not implemented. The petitioner …
The petitioners, represented by Mayank Shekhar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Sadar, Jaunpur to decide two pending restoration applications (case no. 726/2026 under Section 209(J) of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 and case no. 11117/2025 …
Petitioner Geeta Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tahsildar of Bansgaon to decide a pending mutation proceeding (Case No. 2075 of 2025) under sections 34 and 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The mutation had been allowed by a decree dated 14‑10‑2019 based on a …
The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar Shukla, filed a suit under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Up Ziladhikari of Tehsil Machhalishahar on 7 May 2022, which remains pending despite completion of pleadings. He approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ directing the revenue …
The petitioner, Chhangur Rai, filed a mutation suit (Case No. 12740 of 2026) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which has been pending before the Tehsildar (Respondent No‑2) since 4 May 2026. He sought a writ of mandamus directing the Tehsildar to decide the case within a stipulated …
Petitioner Usha Sonkar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Gola, District Gorakhpur (respondent No.2) to decide a pending mutation suit (Suit No.1120/2026) filed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The suit, concerning specific land plots in Bishra …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 35(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Sadar, Azamgarh to decide an appeal (Case No. 14024/2026) that had been pending since 2 April 2026. The petition alleged undue …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Azamgarh Division to decide an appeal filed under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since September 4, 2025. The petitioner argued that the delay …
The petitioner, Deepak Solanki, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administrative) of Agra Division to decide a restoration application filed on 24‑12‑2025 under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration application sought to recall an …
The petitioner, Ramnath, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (Judicial) Koraon, Prayagraj, to decide a revenue case (RST/1950/2026) pending under Section 38(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since 27 October 2014. The petitioner argued that the delay …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Additional Collector (Finance and Revenue), Shamli, to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. RST/115/2026) under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had remained undecided for almost a year despite a prior order to decide it …
The petitioner, Shilpi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Handia, District Prayagraj, to decide a pending suit (No. 21440 of 2025) filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit, filed on …
The petitioner, Triveni Ram, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 218/2022) under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the case had …
Petitioner Sanjay Verma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Vice Chairman of the Agra Development Authority to demarcate plot no.602 in Chhipi Tola, Sabji Mandi, Agra. The Court examined whether the petitioner could be compelled to demarcate the plot under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioner sought a writ directing the State to remove an encroachment by respondent No.4 on a pond and to compel the Tehsildar to conclude pending proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition relied on an eviction order dated 11‑April‑2025 that had not been …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the respondents to remove illegal encroachments on Plot Nos. 484 and 485 in Sikandarpur village. The petitioner relied on an order passed under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for eviction and recovery of damages, …
The petitioner, Smt. Sarita @ Savita, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Ghaziabad to decide her appeal under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to stay the execution of an ex‑parte order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the …
The applicant, Uttim Chauhan, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Akanksha Mishra, failed to comply with a September 8, 2025 order in Writ C No. 31030, which required her to consider the applicant's application. The court noted that instructions had been produced …
The petitioner Bholanath filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) of Tehsil Shohratgarh to decide a pending revenue case (T201917630505885) under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay in the SDO's disposal …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, challenged a revenue record discrepancy concerning plots purchased by his father, where the original owner's name and his sons' names remained in the records despite a sale deed dated 1964. An application under Sections 31 and 32 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, to …
Arjun Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of an alleged encroacher (respondent No.5) from Gaon Sabha land (Gata No.90). The State of U.P. and six other respondents opposed the relief, arguing that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue …
The petitioner, Geeta Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue proceeding (Case No.11936 of 2025) under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding had been pending since …
The petitioner, Seema Srivatava, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur, to decide a pending mutation appeal (Case No. 10668 of 2025) under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal had been pending since 2 January …
Arun Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of alleged encroachers (respondents 4‑10) from three plots of Nagar Palika land (Plot Nos. 2091, 2261 and 1932). The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Nagar Palika, contended that the petitioner could obtain …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Kasya, Kushinagar to decide a pending revenue proceeding within a stipulated period. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding was not being conducted expeditiously. …
The applicant, Subash Chauhan, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied the order dated 09‑06‑2025 in Writ‑C No. 19180 of 2025, which directed them to execute a revenue order dated 07‑07‑2023 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. The applicant claimed …
The petitioners, Anil Kumar and another, filed a writ seeking a certiorari to quash a notice dated 14 January 2026 that led to their eviction and demolition of a house on Gata No.79 Mi, which they claimed was an abadi area and thus protected. The State respondents argued that the eviction was based …
The petitioner, Malakh, filed a writ petition seeking the speedy disposal of an application filed on 18‑02‑2026 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. and others indicated that notices had already been issued to private respondents and the matter would proceed …
The petitioners, Neelam Kesari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Phoolpur, to expedite the decision on their restoration application (Case No. RST/4515 of 2023) pending in case 3807 of 2017 under Section 24 of …
The petitioner, Hinchh Narayan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial) of Handia, Prayagraj to decide a pending suit for division of holding under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The suit had been pending since 15 September 2025, and …
Petitioner Priya Upadhyay filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (respondent No.2) to decide her pending appeal (Case No. 21688 of 2025) under section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal arose from orders passed under Section 34 of the U.P. Land …
Petitioner Smt. Jyotiya filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Sub Divisional Officer (ASDO) of Sadar Ghazipur to decide a pending suit (No. 10555/2025) under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 11 September 2025. The petitioner alleged …
Mulki Devi filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to implement an order dated 09‑06‑2025 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to consider her subsequent applications dated 13‑02‑2026 and …
Ramsingar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial) of Mariahu, Jaunpur, to hear and decide a recall/restoration application filed on 26 July 2024 against an order dated 15 April 2024 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …
Ashok Giri filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue authority, to register and decide an application dated 20‑01‑2026 filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s sole prayer was for the expeditious …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Officer Second, Azamgarh to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.10529 of 2026) under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding was not being conducted expeditiously. The …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide the pending revenue case Sanjay Pathak v. State of U.P. (Case No. RST/2247/2026) filed under Section 209(Ja) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending for …
Hareram filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Azamgarh Division, to decide Appeal No. 589/2017 (Triloki vs. Triveni) filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from a suit …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Auraiya, to decide an application filed on 27 May 2026 under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court, after obtaining instructions, learned that the application had been registered as case …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on land identified as Khasra No.427 (recorded as Manure Pits). The petition relied on earlier eviction orders passed under Section 122-B of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 against respondents …
The petitioner, Sudarshan Yadav, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to the Tehsildar of Kaptanganj Tehsil to decide a pending case (No. T202405440603317) concerning encroachments on public utility land under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged …
Nikhil Kumar filed a contempt application alleging that Tehsildar Sri Javed Ansari willfully defied the High Court's order dated 07-11-2025, which directed the Tehsildar to decide a mutation suit within three months. The order, issued in Writ‑C No. 38509 of 2025, warned that non‑compliance would …
Petitioner Keshav Lal and another filed a writ petition seeking that a revenue case (No. T202514360614849) pending under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 be decided expeditiously. The petitioners prayed for a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Mariahu, to dispose of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to enforce an eviction order dated 29.05.2023, issued by the Tahsildar under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the order had not been executed and requested the court to order …
The petitioner, Siddharth Singh, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash three orders issued in revenue mutation proceedings under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. raised a preliminary objection that such summary mutation proceedings do not determine …
Petitioner Deep Narayan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide Case No. 9253 of 2026 (Deep Narayan v. Gram Sabha) pending under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a fixed time. The petition solely requested expeditious disposal of the said case. …
Pawan Kumar filed a writ petition seeking implementation of an order dated 06‑10‑2025 passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. An appeal against that order is pending and was admitted on 23‑07‑2026, with the file of the subordinate authority summoned. The petitioner argued that the …
Manauvar Ali challenged two orders dismissing his first appeal and subsequent restoration under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for want of prosecution. He filed a second restoration application on 16‑06‑2026, after which the officer orally informed his counsel that the application was …
The petitioner, Haribhuvan Shukla, filed a writ petition under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking expeditious disposal of a civil suit (Case No. 2004 of 2026) pending before the Nagar Panchayat. The petition lacked an order sheet and the case was still awaiting service of notice on …
Kalpnath filed a writ petition challenging orders passed under Sections 67 and 67(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in two revenue cases. He alleged that the authorities ignored material evidence that would have shown he was not an encroacher of the Navin Parti land. The respondents …
The petitioner, allotted a plot in 2001, had his allotment affirmed by an order dated 18‑12‑2023 under Section 198(4) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950. He applied under Section 76 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 to be recorded as bhumidhar with transferable rights, which was …
The petitioner challenged a mutation order passed by a Naib Tehsildar under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which recorded the name of a private respondent based on a registered will deed dated 21‑02‑2009. The petitioner’s appeal under Section 35(2) and subsequent revision under Section …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar to decide a pending proceeding under Section 27 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding, initiated on 12 March 2026, was not being …
The petitioner challenged three orders that recorded the names of private respondents as owners of a plot based on a registered sale deed, arguing that the sale deed was under a pending civil suit for cancellation and therefore the mutation court lacked jurisdiction. The petition sought a writ of …
Two civil suits for partition of land (Arazi Nos. 257, 283, 284) were dismissed by the trial court under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, holding the property to be agricultural and thus within the jurisdiction of the Revenue Court. The trial court's orders were reversed by a lower appellate …
The petitioner, Ram Gopal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) 2nd Agra Division to decide appeal No. 935 of 2026 filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, and a certiorari to quash the order rejecting his interim relief. The petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Agra Division to decide Appeal No. 701 of 2024, filed under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal had been pending since 29‑12‑2023, and the petitioner alleged that …
Petitioner Rampa Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to decide her application dated 28‑08‑2025, which sought rejection of proceedings under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to act against other respondents for alleged forgery and false …
Petitioner Chhedi Lal filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to decide Revision No. 5321 of 2024 (Mohd. Saeed v. Chhedi Lal) filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the revision had been pending since 2024 and was being adjourned …
The petitioners filed a writ of mandamus seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Jakhaniya, Ghazipur, to decide a revenue case (Case No. 6998 of 2025) pending under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since 2024. The petition alleged undue delay and attached the order sheet …
The petition challenges three orders dated 11 July 2024, 26 November 2025 and 25 April 2026 issued by the Consolidation Officer (CO), the Sub‑Office Consolidation (SOC) and the District Deputy Commissioner (DDC) in Etah concerning the record of Khata No. 396 (Gata No. 864). The petitioner claims …
Prem Singh and two others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil‑Khair, Aligarh, to decide a pending revenue proceeding (case No. 3817 of 2021, State v. Suresh) that had been remanded under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners …
Petitioners Gulab Singh and three others filed a writ petition challenging the initiation of proceedings under Sections 104/105 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that they are not members of the Scheduled Caste and therefore the embargo under Section 98 does not apply. The State, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy District Magistrate of Ballia to register and decide two applications for demarcation of arazies filed on 30‑04‑2025 and 02‑06‑2026. The petitioner alleged that the applications had not been registered, while the State …
Petitioner Prahlad Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing revenue officials to investigate and order the return of his alleged illegally possessed land (Gata No. 621, 266 hectares) in Sambhal district. He asked the court to compel the officials to act on his application dated …
Ram Sevak Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Gaon Sabha (respondent No.2) to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.15290 of 2024) under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a time frame fixed by the court. The High Court examined whether it …
The petitioner, Sudama, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate and others to decide Suit No. 70 of 2023, which is pending before the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Padrauna, under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the suit had …
The petitioner challenged a series of orders relating to Khata No. 418 in Etah district, alleging that the Consolidation Officer’s (CO) order of 11 July 2024 allowing objections under Section 9 of the Consolidation of Holdings (CH) Act was improperly appealable and that the subsequent dismissal of …
Sheshnath Yadav filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an illegal encroachment by respondent 6 on Plot No.705Mi, recorded as Usar in Mahuwari village, Jaunpur district. The petitioner argued that a proceeding under Section …
Subedar Yadav filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State authorities to remove an encroachment on a public utility road (Gata No. 262) in Gudnupur village, Basti district. The petitioner argued that the encroachment caused irreparable loss and demanded …
Petitioner Bhure Ali challenged two notices dated 10 July 2026—one issued under the Uttar Pradesh (Regulation of Building Operations) Act, 1958 and another under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006—seeking demolition of his house. The petitioner argued that the State must give him notice and …
Petitioner Chandrika Yadav filed a public interest litigation seeking removal of illegal obstructions recorded as Nali Tubewell on several plots in Azamgarh. The High Court earlier directed the petitioner to file applications under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which resulted in Cases …
The petitioner, Suresh Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an eviction and damages order dated 18.02.2026 issued by the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and also sought a mandamus directing the recovery of Rs. 18,000 in damages. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Kasiya, Kushinagar to decide a proceeding under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 10 November 2025. The petitioner alleged that the case was not being progressed …
Manju Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Barhaj, Deoria to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.856 of 2025) filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the magistrate had delayed the proceedings since …
Petitioners Aditya Singh and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Ghazipur, to consolidate several pending cases (Nos. 3112‑3117 and 3102 of 2026) filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to decide them together …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Phulpur, Prayagraj to expeditiously decide a pending suit for division of land holding filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and also requested a status‑quo injunction to prevent …
The petitioner Sushil Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (respondent No.2) to decide a recall/restoration application filed on 2 July 2025 under Section 30(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to stay the effect of an order dated 22 …
The petitioner, Sarita Pathak, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Azamgarh to decide a pending revenue proceeding (Case No.972/2025) under Sections 34 and 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Gauri Shankar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (respondent No.3) to decide a pending suit for division of holding under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the case, initiated in 2024, had not been …
Somaru Prasad Verma filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Assistant Collector to enforce an eviction and damages order dated 24‑08‑2020 passed under Section 122‑B of the U.P. Zilla and Land Revenue Act, 1950. The petitioner alleged that despite the order, the authorities had taken …
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav filed a writ petition challenging an alleged illegal encroachment on public land identified as Garha (Arazi No. 19, 0.2060 hectare). The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and six others, contested the claim. The Court examined whether the writ jurisdiction was the …
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash the order dated 6 July 2026 of the Sub Divisional Officer that rectified plot no. 962 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and to maintain a status‑quo on the patthargarhi. He alleged that the revenue report relied upon was …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner Judicial, Prayagraj Division, to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 2828 of 2024) filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the case, involving private …
The petitioner Deshraj filed a writ petition seeking certiorari and mandamus to quash an eviction and damages order dated 04-03-2025 passed by the Tehsildar of Ghatampur under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, claiming long‑standing possession of the land. The petition was filed after a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a stay application dated 16‑April‑2026 and a suit for division of holding pending before the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Kasya, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. …
The petitioner, Ram Soorat Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to grant possession of plot No. 454M in Prayagraj, based on a decree passed by a Sub‑District Magistrate under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The decree had been appealed …
The petitioner, Bhawani Prasad Tiwari, filed a writ petition challenging the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate’s (S.D.M.) order dated 29 July 2026 that rejected his application for impleadment as an interested party in a revenue proceeding under section 38(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The …
The petitioners, co‑tenants of a land parcel, inherited a half‑share from Shridevi, who died intestate on 16‑09‑1974. Respondent parties claimed ownership based on a sale deed dated 22‑10‑1974, which the petitioners argued was executed after Shridevi's death and therefore fraudulent. The Tehsildar …
The petitioner, Vikesh Garg, challenged an eviction and damages order dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Tehsildar under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. He had filed an appeal under Section 67(5) of the same Code, which was pending before the Additional District Magistrate. The petitioner …
The petitioners, who were granted Sirdari leases in 1968 and whose mutation orders were recorded, sought a writ of mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer and revenue authorities to correct revenue entries in CH Form 11 and Form 23 and to prevent their eviction. The respondents argued that …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash orders dated 11 May 2026 and 9 September 2025 that rejected his objection to the demarcation of a field book and dismissed his appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 without a hearing. The petitioner alleged that the …
Petitioner Dinesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division to dispose of his appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which has been pending since 30 September 2024. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Bhadohi to decide a pending mutation suit (No. 518479 of 2025) under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay since the suit was filed on 29-12-2025. …
Petitioner Lal Bahadur filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Powayan to decide a mutation case (No. 3339 of 2016) pending since 2016 under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay and unnecessary …
The petitioner, Dhirendra Singh Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) Kanpur Nagar to decide a pending proceeding (Case No.1292 of 2025) under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending …
Smt. Shivpatti Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Phoolpur Tehsil to decide a pending mutation proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding, initiated on 20‑01‑2023, was unduly delayed. The Court, …
Petitioners Gaya Prasad and two others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to stay their appeal (No. C202602000001082) under Section 207 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 2006 and to maintain status quo over a disputed 1.4950‑hectare property. The appeal, along with an interim relief application, …
The petitioner, Saroj, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib‑Tehsildar of Tarya, Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar to decide a mutation proceeding (Case No. 1962 of 2022, Computerized No. T202205440101962) pending under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 since 2022. The …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Shahganj Tehsil to decide a pending mutation case (case no. 5124 of 2026) and to mutate his name in the revenue records based on a registered sale deed dated 12‑01‑2026. The petitioner alleged …
The petitioner, Shankar Lal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Soraon to decide a pending restoration application filed on 4 February 2022. The restoration application pertained to an earlier case (Computer case No. T202002030308201 of 2019) …
The petitioner, Komal, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Rudhauli Tehsil to enforce an order passed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 for demolition of an illegal construction, and also directing the Collector to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Varanasi Division to decide an appeal (computerized case no. C202514000000543) pending under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from a suit for division of …
The petitioner Jiyalal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to set aside an eviction and damages order dated 18‑June‑2026 passed by the Tehsildar of Handia and to restrain the respondents from interfering with his possession of a disputed plot until the petition is decided. He also requested …
The petitioners Munna and others challenged two orders: one dated 23 July 2026 dismissing their second appeal as not maintainable under Section 209(e) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, and another dated 16 October 2025 which remanded the matter back to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate after setting …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a computerized revenue case (T202616660108771/2026) concerning land in Village‑Musahi, under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the proceeding, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to comply with an order dated 12‑Nov‑2020 passed under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to deliver possession of the land. The petitioners argued that the order had been affirmed after an appeal was …
The petitioner sought to quash a mutation order dated 17‑12‑2008 that was based on a sale deed executed by his mother, alleging the deed was illegal. After a nine‑year delay, the petitioner filed a restoration application, which the mutation court allowed but ultimately upheld the original mutation …
The petitioner, Narendra Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) II, Agra Division, to decide an appeal (No. 1909 of 2025) filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from proceedings under Section 144 of the …
Petitioner Lilawati Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar, Hata Kushinagar, to expedite a mutation proceeding under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2013 (case no. 6025 of 2026). The petitioner alleged that the proceedings …
The petitioner, Ritika Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Varanasi Division to decide a pending revision under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, relating to a mutation proceeding. The petition alleged undue …
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a High Court order dated 24‑11‑2025 directing the removal of an illegal encroachment on public utility land, an order that had been issued in a public interest litigation (P.I.L.) and upheld on appeal under Section 67 of the …
Petitioner Smt. Shivpatti Devi filed a writ petition under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking expeditious disposal of Suit No.19022 of 2026 (Shivpatti v. Kedarnath Tripathi). The petition highlighted that the lower court had only fixed general dates and had not set a timeline for …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash the order dated 8 July 2026 that rejected their restoration application against a decree dated 8 September 2018. They argued that the impugned order was passed without considering the facts, despite an interim …
Petitioner Satendra Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, U.P. Circuit Court Meerut to decide Revision No. 358 of 2025 (Amaruddin & others v. Satendra Singh & others) under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a fixed period. The petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 challenging a stay order issued by the appellate Commissioner, who had admitted an appeal by respondent No. 4 and stayed the Sub‑Divisional Officer’s order allowing measurement of gata No. 99. The Sub‑Divisional …
Petitioner Usha Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to enforce a revenue order dated 16‑Oct‑2023, which had ordered the demarcation of her property under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Although boundary pillars were …
The petitioner, Lal Mani, filed a writ petition challenging a notification dated 24 June 2026 ordering the re‑auction of Pond No. 589 in Village Bheski, Prayagraj. He claimed that a fishery lease had been granted to him for ten years starting 28 July 2022, and that he was ready to pay the balance …
Petitioners Karuna Pati Dubey and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Aurai, Bhadohi, to decide a pending restoration application filed under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration …
The petitioner, Deen Dayal, filed a writ petition challenging an interim order dated 02‑07‑2026 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Judicial in Appeal No. 1172 of 2026 (Shyamveer et al. v. Deen Dayal et al.) under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner sought to set aside the …
The petitioner, Durga Prasad Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of a civil suit (Case No.4653 of 2022) under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the proceedings were delayed due to a prolonged strike by lawyers. The court noted that the strike, while …
The petitioner, Durga Prasad Mishra, filed a writ petition under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking the expeditious disposal of a civil suit (Case No. 4651 of 2022) pending before the trial court. The petition was filed amid a strike by lawyers, which the petitioner argued was …
Petitioner Durga Prasad Mishra filed a writ petition under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking expeditious disposal of a pending civil suit (Case No.4652 of 2022). The High Court, noting a related order in Writ C No.34328 of 2026, disposed of the petition by directing the trial court …
The petitioners, Amarnath and five others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a revenue case (Computerized Case No. T202616660108772/2026) concerning 1.9050 hectares of land in Musahi village. The petition alleged that the …
The petitioners challenged an eviction and damages order, alleging that the district magistrate had illegally rejected their restoration application. They filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the district magistrate to decide the pending restoration application within a fixed period and …
The petitioner, Ram Dayal, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Gaon Sabha subsequently filed a restoration application against that order, which was stayed. The learned Standing Counsel informed the court of these developments. The …
The petitioner, Geeta Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Upziladhikari/Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Lalganj, Mirzapur, to decide an appeal (No. T202516530205562 2025) pending under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the appeal …
The petitioner, Anand Kumar Saini, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18‑09‑2025 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code‑2006. The order concerned a revenue case (Case No. 11404 of 2025). The State’s Standing …
Petitioner Prateek Pandey filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue authority, to register and decide a pending case under sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, dated 14 January 2026. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates …
Petitioner Mohammad Rashid filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Up‑Ziladhikari of Sagadi, District Azamgarh (Respondent No.3) to decide case No. 8429/2026 (Shivanand et al. v. Imtiyaz et al.) pending under section 38(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj, to decide Appeal No. 2484 of 2024 (Bahadur Ram Bahadur v. Moti Lal & others) pending under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the appeal …
The petitioner, Panchu, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of U.P. to remove illegal encroachments on three plots recorded as Banjar and Rasta in the revenue records of Village Aurahawa, Siddharth Nagar. The revenue authorities had earlier passed orders under Section …
Petitioner Raj Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) IInd Agra Division to decide Appeal No. 218 of 2026, filed under section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, on the ground that the appeal was pending with several dates fixed but no decision …
Moti Lal filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Uttar Pradesh revenue authorities to implement an order dated 17 July 2025 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which directed eviction of encroachers from public land. The petitioner argued that despite …
Petitioner Ved Prakash Pathak filed a PIL alleging that respondents 5, 6 and 7 had encroached upon Plot No.336, recorded as a pond, in Village Pariyat, Jaunpur. An eviction order dated 10.03.2025 issued by the Tehsildar had not been executed, prompting the petition. The Court directed the …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on three parcels of land in Village Sultanpur, Noida Authority area. The court examined an instruction from the Tehsildar indicating that, under the amendment to sub‑section 6 of Section 59 of …
Vijay Pal filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by respondents 5‑7 on Plot No.601, recorded as Banjar land in Ghaziabad district. The Court examined instructions from the Deputy District Magistrate …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment on Plot No. 658 (0.045 ha) in Village Jaupur, Jaunpur. The court noted an instruction dated 12‑02‑2026 from the Deputy District Magistrate ordering eviction, and observed that earlier cases …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation alleging that Plot No. 735, recorded as a Johad (pond) in revenue records, had been illegally encroached upon by respondents 6 to 9. The respondents contended that no encroachment existed and that the petition was based on incorrect facts. The Court …
The petitioner, Chhatrapal, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove encroachments on public pond and Usar land (plots 406 and 407) in Village Karmon, Fatehpur district. The Court examined the instructions from …
Ram Pravesh Yadav filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by private respondents on Plot No. 1661G (Bhita) in Village Adri, District Mau. The revenue authority had issued instructions showing that the plot is …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking compliance of an injunction order issued by a trial court under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the order had not been implemented. The respondent's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection, contending that such orders are …
The petitioner, Parmanand, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 01‑09‑2023 and a subsequent order dated 28‑04‑2025 issued by the Chief Executive Officer of the Noida Authority, alleging that his structures were on unacquired land. Earlier, the Division Bench had directed the …
The petitioner, Jiledar, claimed ownership of two plots in Jaunpur and sought possession after a favorable order under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was issued on 16‑02‑2023. Although stones were affixed on the land, possession had not been delivered, prompting a writ petition for …
Petitioner Rajneesh Ranjan filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Koraon, Prayagraj, to decide a pending partition suit under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a short, fixed period. The petitioner relied on Sub‑Rule (10) of Rule …
The petitioner, Smt. Kalyani Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, to decide a restoration application filed on 17‑07‑2023 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that …
The petitioners, Tulsiram and two others, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the third respondent to decide a pending civil case (No. 11113 of 2024, Sita Ram & Others vs Nagar Panchayat Harraiya & Others) under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to maintain a status‑quo on a …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28-10-2024 passed by the Collector of Firozabad under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which stayed proceedings for cancellation of a lease granted to them. They sought a writ of certiorari to quash the order, a writ of …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad was hearing a contempt application filed by Murlidhar Mishra against Sub‑District Magistrate Amit Kumar Jaiswal. The writ court had earlier directed the opposite party to complete proceedings under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The …
The High Court, in a writ petition (PIL No.2390 of 2021), directed the applicant to file an application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, to determine alleged encroachment. The applicant complied, and the Revenue Team submitted a report on 18‑08‑2025 stating that no encroachment …
The writ court had directed the Tehsildar to complete proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Tehsildar filed a compliance affidavit on 21 October 2024, attaching the order dated 27 March 2024 as annexure. The applicant, Gopal Ji Pandey, filed a contempt application alleging …
The writ court had directed the opposite party, Dr. Vandana Mishra, to complete proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed an affidavit stating that the proceedings were concluded on 31-10-2025, attaching the relevant document as Annexure 3. The court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order that directed the institution of a case under Section 38 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondents argued that the petitioner had already appeared before the concerned authority and lodged objections. The High Court held that a …
The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to enforce an order dated 16‑10‑2021 passed by the Tehsildar (Judicial) in a revenue suit under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. He claimed to be an inhabitant of the village concerned and asked the Court to compel …
The appellants, a group of Scheduled Caste members, appealed a trial court order that dismissed their suit seeking to declare a 2023 declaratory deed cancelling a 2015 consortium agreement void and to compel specific performance of that agreement. They argued that the consortium agreement contained …
The applicant's father obtained a partition decree under Section 176 (now Section 116) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, with a final decree dated 28‑05‑2014. Instead of executing the decree, the applicant filed a writ petition in 2024 seeking removal of alleged illegal encroachments on government …
The petitioner, Dharmvir, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 06‑09‑2025 that constituted a revenue team to proceed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 concerning a 0.047‑hectare land (Gata No. 988). The petitioner argued that the revenue proceedings were pending and sought …
Amar Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the land demarcation was carried out without his presence and that the inspection report was not provided to him. The High Court had earlier directed the State's standing …
The petitioner sought a direction to restrain the Gram Pradhan from constructing a road over Plot No. 615, recorded as Banjar land in Village Dhaneli, Bareilly, alleging misappropriation of Gaon Sabha funds and lack of public benefit. The respondents produced a Deputy District Magistrate's …
The petitioner, Sudarshan Lal Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 20 January 2026 passed by the respondent under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in the case Gaon Sabha vs. Sudarshan Lal. The order had been issued in a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Badalapur, Jaunpur to decide a stay application filed on 21‑08‑2025 in a declaratory suit under section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The stay application had remained pending despite several …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to enforce an order dated 21‑10‑2024 issued under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which directed the eviction of illegal encroachments from plot no. 392 in Village Tisaura, Varanasi. The petitioner alleged that …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division to decide appeal No. 441/2023 (Ravikant Pathak v. Subash) pending under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since April 2023. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, …
Petitioner Anita Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Chandauli to decide her restoration suit (RST/2999 of 2025) filed under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the application had been pending since 2025 despite several …
Ram Sajeevan filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Chayal, to implement a prior directive dated 18‑02‑2025 and to conclude pending proceedings under Section 24(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the …
The petitioner, Babulal, challenged the initiation of a revenue case (Case No. 5206 of 2025) against him before the Tehsildar of Mahawan, alleging that the proceeding was instituted under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 without jurisdiction and was non‑maintainable. He sought a writ of …
In PIL No.1206 of 2026, petitioner Daya Shanker sought a court direction to the Tehsildar of Sadar, Basti to decide a pending revenue case (No.6273 of 2025) concerning encroachment on a public utility plot under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had …
The petitioner, Naresh Bal Bhatnagar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, the Revenue Officer, to decide a pending case (Case No. 10507 of 2021) filed under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being …
Petitioner Prashant Kumar Bind filed a public interest litigation seeking execution of a 4 November 2023 order directing removal of encroachment from a plot in Jaunpur under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court noted that the order had not been implemented and issued notices …
The applicant, Lalmuni Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Tehsildar Shailendra Singh, had failed to comply with a writ dated 13 March 2024 directing the conclusion of proceedings under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party submitted …
The petitioner, Ramvriksha Nishad, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to respondent No.3 to decide a representation dated 20 August 2025, aiming to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by private respondent No.6 on a 0.016 hectare plot recorded as Banjar in Jaunpur …
Raju Prajapati filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of U.P. and other respondents to act against alleged illegal constructions on Plot Nos. 687 and 692 in Village Deepapur, Jaunpur. The petitioner asked the court to compel respondents 2 and 3 to initiate action against …
The petitioner, Roop Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment on plot No. 795Gha in Village Baraoli, Agra. The court noted an instruction dated 24‑01‑2026 from the Deputy District Magistrate ordering proceedings under Section 67(1) of the …
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment on plot No. 525 (0.0240 hectare) in Village Bhadesar, Deoria. The court noted that the Tehsildar had already issued an instruction dated 16‑12‑2025 and had initiated proceedings under Section …
Megh Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Chandausi, Sambhal, to enforce an eviction order dated 13‑07‑2024 issued under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner claimed that he had sent an application under Para 460(1) of the U.P. …
The petitioner, Hanuman, filed a public interest litigation challenging the non‑compliance with an order dated 29‑Nov‑2024 issued under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 concerning encroachment on Plot No. 156 in Village Dipaipur, Jaunpur. The Court directed the State’s standing counsel to …
The petitioners Ompal and seven others filed a writ petition challenging two orders that removed their names from the khatauni of a property: one dated 29‑08‑2025 by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) and another dated 28‑07‑2023 by the Sub‑Divisional Officer under section 38(2) of the …
The petitioner, Smt. Gena Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.2) to decide a land restoration application filed in 2022 under Sections 34 and 209 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the …
The petition challenged a order of the Board of Revenue (respondent No.2) that rejected the petitioner’s application alleging violation of interim status‑quo orders in a second appeal concerning a division‑of‑holding suit. The petitioner claimed the respondent No.6 was constructing on the disputed …
The petitioner, Smt. Durgawati, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) of Azamgarh to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 4698/2025) under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been delayed since 2025. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Smt. Pooja Deol, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue officer, to decide Case No. 6708 of 2023 (Arnav Singh & others v. Waheed & others) under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the …
The petitioner Jirawati filed a writ petition seeking to quash a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate's order dated 10‑12‑2025 that dismissed a review petition filed by Mamta under section 209(Ja) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and to restrain the respondents from interfering with her possession of a …
The petitioner, Ram Gopal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj to decide appeal No. 1422 of 2024 (Laxmikant Dixit v. Rakesh Kumar) under Section 207 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2024 despite …
Petitioner Kailash filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur, to decide Appeal No. C 202505000001425 pending under Section 229 Kha of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the appeal had been pending despite several dates being fixed, …
Petitioner Jitendra Kumar Shukla filed a writ petition under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to decide Mutation Case No. 696 of 2022, which had remained pending since 2022 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the undue …
The petitioner, Shivam Chauhan, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide a pending revenue proceeding (Case No. T20250190101398) concerning illegal encroachment in Village Nauner, Mainpuri. The proceeding is under …
The petitioners, who had purchased disputed land, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue to decide a pending review application (No. 4631 of 2025) filed under Section 220 of the U.P. Revenue Code. They argued that the earlier revision was dismissed due …
The petitioner, Ramchandra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a restoration application filed in 2022 under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006, and to restrain Respondent No.4 from interfering with peaceful possession of the disputed land. The …
Petitioner Poonam Singh filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of her restoration application pending before the Tehsildar, Sadar Deoria, under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition sought a time‑bound decision on the application filed in 2022. The State’s …
Petitioner Jawahar Lal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, to decide a revenue case (Case No. 7232 of 2021) pending since 2021 under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the prolonged delay defeats the …
