Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
321 judgments · newest first · showing 201–321
The petitioner filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to implement a revenue order dated 31 July 2025 that ordered removal of illegal encroachment on public utility land. The petitioner argued that the order under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, had not been …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Rudrapur, to decide a revenue case (Case No.RST/11072/2025) that had been pending since January 2021 and, after a remand, since March 2025. The petition invoked Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, …
Petitioner Mohd Akhtar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue to decide a pending revision (Rev/563/2025) under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The revision arose from an ex parte order passed under Section 24, against which a recall …
The petitioners Mahaveer Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction under Section 117 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, for the Assistant Collector (Revenue) to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 2373 of 2025) that had been awaiting …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the execution of orders passed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 against several respondents. The petitioner alleged that despite the orders being passed and efforts made by authorities, the respondents were refusing to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restrain the State authorities from dispossessing them of a portion of Plot No. 59 (recorded as Harijan Abadi) which was being treated as part of Plot No. 58 (Chakroad) in Azamgarh. They also asked that the order dated 18‑01‑2023, passed …
Petitioner Kamlesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, U.P., to decide Revision No. 2989 of 2025 under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that notices were issued before the revision was admitted, the lower court records have …
Sai Deen filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2‑4 to remove an illegal encroachment of a house built by respondents No.6‑9 on Gata No.429, and to decide pending representations. The petitioner alleged that an order under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 dated …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to summon a 1974-75 patta allotment record for Village Umari and to restrain respondents Nos. 4 to 7 from illegal construction on his land (Gata No. 2337, 150 sq. yd.) in Auraiya. The petition essentially involved a …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State of U.P. and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on Gata No. 199, 0.2000 hectares of land, based on earlier orders under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Officer, Second, Sadar, District Azamgarh to decide a pending case (No. 10509 of 2022) under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the case remained …
The petitioners Vijay and six others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue) of Gorakhpur to decide a pending recall/restoration application and a stay application in case No.9001/2025, filed under Section 38(2) of the Uttar Pradesh …
Santosh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondent No.3 to comply with an order dated 19‑03‑26. The petition arose out of a dispute with a private respondent. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition was not maintainable because it …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Saidpur, Ghazipur to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. T202014290402787) concerning encroachment on a 1.0090 hectare plot recorded as land of Tal. The case, filed under Section 67(1) of the Uttar Pradesh …
The petitioner, Anil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking certiorari to quash an order dated 16/05/2025 passed by the Tehsildar/Assistant Collector under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the order was illegal and sought its setting aside. The …
Petitioner Laturi Singh challenged an order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Up‑Ziladhikari (Judicial) of Tehsil‑Patiyali under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging it was issued ex‑parte without giving him an opportunity to be heard. The respondents contended that the proviso to …
Petitioner Aishraj filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of his application dated 24‑02‑2026 filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which was pending beyond the prescribed time‑bound period. The sole relief prayed for was a direction to the respondent to decide the …
Petitioner Kamal Sen Singh filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash orders dated 31‑05‑2025 and 25‑11‑2024 issued by the District Magistrate and Assistant Collector, Jaunpur, under section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the inspection report was ex parte and that he was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case alleging forgery, cheating and criminal intimidation in connection with a sale deed of agricultural land. They contended that the …
The petitioner sought to have his name recorded under Section 12 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 based on a sale deed dated 13 July 2020, after the village had been notified under Section 6 of the same Act on 28 February 2013. Earlier orders by the Consolidation Officer in his favour …
The High Court had earlier, on 13 September 2021, directed the opposite party to complete proceedings under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in Writ‑C No. 22240 of 2021. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 12 March 2024 stating that the required proceedings were …
The petitioner, Krishnawati Devi, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the respondent No.2 to decide pending proceedings under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which have been pending since 2020 despite a Lekhpal report filed in 2022. The petitioner argued that the delay was …
The petitioner, Shyam Narain Chaubey, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 03-10-2025 issued under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. and others raised a preliminary objection that the impugned order is appealable under Section 67(5) of the …
Dayaram Yadav filed a writ petition challenging the Lekhpal's demarcation reports (RC Form‑19 dated 08‑01‑2025 and RC Form‑20 dated 03‑07‑2025) and a dispossession order dated 17‑07‑2025, seeking certiorari and mandamus to prevent interference with his possession. The petitioner also raised that a …
The petitioner, Darshan Singh Sahni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 09.04.2026 passed by respondent No.2 in Case No.14608 of 2025, which was issued under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 concerning land in Village Morta, Ghaziabad. The …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Rajaura, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 20-11-2025 passed by a revenue officer under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the order was erroneous and sought its setting aside. The …
The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, filed a writ petition under certiorari challenging an order dated 20‑11‑2025 passed by a revenue officer under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner sought quashing of the order. The respondent’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that …
The petitioner, Rajnarayan Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel Respondent No.3 to remove encroachments by Respondents No.5‑14 on land Gata 319 in Madari village, and to enforce compliance with orders of the Assistant Collector dated 10‑Nov‑2022, 25‑Sep‑2025 and 26‑Dec‑2025 under …
Pushpa Devi and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (Judicial) of Gola Tehsil to decide their pending case under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which has been awaiting disposal since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioners …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a mutation application (Case No. 303-392 of 2006, Sahid Ali v. Azeez Bano) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2006 despite several dates being fixed. The …
The petitioner, Urmila Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to comply with an interim order dated 23.02.2026 issued under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to remove an illegal tin-shed. The petitioner alleged that despite the trial court's order, the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No. 2 to decide Appeal No. C202502000000209 (Diwakar Singh v. Ratnakar Singh) under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code‑2006, alleging undue delay despite multiple dates being fixed. The Court examined the petition and …
The petitioner, Suryanath, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) of Gorakhpur to decide a pending revenue case (RST/162/2023) under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition argued that the case had been pending since 2023 …
Petitioner Raj Narayan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide Appeal No. C202415000001985 (Vijendra Vs. Up‑Ziladhikari) pending under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the appeal had been pending since 2024 without any …
Petitioner Kamla Devi and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tilhar to dispose of a pending mutation case (Case No. 14180 of 2025) under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged undue delay despite several dates being …
The petitioners, Ram Narayan Dwivedi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Gorakhpur Division to expedite the disposal of case No. 602 of 2025, which was pending under section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to consider their grievance and pass an order on an application dated 15‑07‑2025. The grievance arose out of a dispute with a private individual, Respondent No.4. The State’s Standing Counsel raised a preliminary …
The petitioner, Isthar Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tehsil Sadar, Maharajganj to decide a pending mutation case (No. 22703 of 2024) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay despite several dates being fixed. The …
The petitioner, Durg Vijay Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a pending Review Application No. 906/A filed in Appeal No. C201915000000960 under Section 38(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that despite several …
Petitioner Uma Shankar filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 31.03.2026 that directed him to remove constructions on disputed land and threatened initiation of proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the notice was not a valid notice under …
Petitioner Sahabaj Chauhan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue officer, to decide a pending case (RST/5773/2025) under sections 34 and 209(ज) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2025 despite …
The petitioner Anita filed writ petition No.17497 of 2026 seeking a direction to the second respondent, a revenue authority, to decide a restoration/recall application pending in suit RST/5323/2025. The petitioner contended that the application had remained undecided despite several dates being …
Petitioner Amar Nath filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to decide an application dated 24 September 2020 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 for land demarcation. The petitioner alleged that the application remained pending despite several …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Panasa to decide a pending mutation suit (case no. 15878 of 2024) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending since 2024 despite several dates being …
Petitioner Lal Babu Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No. 2) to decide case No. 7072/2024 filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the proceeding should be …
The writ court had directed the opposite party to complete proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 5 February 2024, stating that the required proceedings were concluded on 29 January 2024 and attached the relevant document. The …
Manoj Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on plot no.186 in Village Rajdharpur, Jaunpur. The petitioner relied on a revenue record showing the plot as a bhita and demanded corrective action. The respondents produced a Deputy District …
Smt. Phekui filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to comply with an order dated 30‑01‑2019 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an encroachment on Plot No. 640 (0.840 hectare) in Village Hansrajpur, Prayagraj. The Deputy District Magistrate appeared with an affidavit stating that the temporary structure erected by the encroacher, Vijay …
Ramvir Singh Yadav filed a public interest litigation seeking mandamus orders to release Gaon Sabha land encroached upon, recover fines, investigate alleged nexus among officials, and act on a representation. The petitioner relied on eviction orders passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a court direction to compel the revenue court (respondent No.2) to expedite Revision No. 582 of 2026. The petition was filed on 16 April 2026, before the notice dated 21 April 2026 had even been served on …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Baheri to hear a pending restoration application filed on 03‑11‑2025 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the application …
Petitioner Bachu Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Mathura to decide a pending restoration application (Case No. 5460 of 2025) filed under section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the application had been …
The petitioner, Hari Narayan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 10.03.2026 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh, in Appeal No.805 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202515000000805) titled Lalji v. …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the second respondent, a revenue authority, to decide Revision No.141 of 2025 filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that he was the sole contesting party and that the lower court …
The applicant, Ramjeet Yadav, filed a contempt application against Tehsildar Shailesh Kumar alleging that the Tehsildar had violated an order dated 13‑10‑2022 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The order was appealed under Section 67(5) but the appeal was dismissed, leading the …
The petitioner, Ramjas @ Ramyash Yadav, filed a public interest writ seeking the removal of an encroachment on a 0.0220 hectare plot (Gata No.62) in Village Bangaon, Jaunpur, allegedly occupied by respondent No.6, Kamlesh Yadav. The High Court, recalling its earlier direction dated 10‑Feb‑2026, …
The petitioner, Narendra Singh Gangwar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to expedite the decision in case No. 7973 of 2023 (Gram Samaj, Khanpur vs Pramod Kumar, Khanali) under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the delay in …
Petitioner Naman Kumar Rai filed a public interest litigation seeking enforcement of eviction orders dated 13‑10‑2023 and 28‑10‑2023 passed under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 against respondents 5 and 6. The petitioner alleged that despite a Tehsildar’s noting directing a Revenue …
The High Court had earlier directed the opposite party, a Sub-Divisional Officer, to complete proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 19 February 2024 stating that the proceedings were concluded on 21 June 2024, attaching the …
Lal Bihari filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to implement an order dated 30‑12‑2023 issued by the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for eviction of encroachers and recovery of damages. The …
The petitioner Raja filed a writ petition challenging an interim order dated 6 February 2026 issued by the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, which entertained a revision filed by respondent No.6 in a land demarcation matter under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The revision arose after the …
The petitioner, Ramesh Singh, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the first appellate court in proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of filing …
The petitioner, Chhotak @ Chhotkan Vishambhar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Barhaj, Deoria, to decide a suit filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Gopeshwar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Rudrapur to decide a pending revenue case (RST/1174/2025) concerning a land mutation. The petition alleged that despite several dates being fixed since 2025, the respondent had not rendered a …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Officer, to decide a land dispute case (No.3540 of 2017) pending under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. They argued that the proceedings had been pending since 2017 and that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tamkuhiraj Tehsil to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 1219/2024) under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay despite several dates being fixed. The Court, after hearing …
The petitioner, Shiv Pujan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Shahganj, to decide a restoration application pending since August 2025 under sections 209h and 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that multiple dates had been fixed but …
Virendra Chauhan filed a PIL seeking a direction to the State of U.P. to enforce an order dated 5 June 2025, passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, for eviction of encroachers and recovery of damages. The petitioner argued that although the order was issued, no execution had been …
The applicant, Ajit Singh, filed a contempt application against Sub Divisional Magistrate Sanjay Mishra after a writ court order dated 21.08.2024. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 10.03.2026 stating that the writ order had been complied with and that proceedings under Section 38 of …
Ravindra Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on Plot No.256, recorded as a manure pit, by respondent No.6. The Tehsildar's instructions revealed that a pucca house occupies 0.0100 hectare and a Panchayat Bhawan occupies 0.0200 hectare of …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on Plot No.64, recorded as a main road in the revenue records of Village Kunjalpur, Tehsil Jalesar, District Etah. The encroachments, amounting to 0.080 hectare and 6 square metres, were made …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to remove alleged illegal encroachments by private respondents on several parcels of land recorded as Banjar, Abadi, and Chakmarg in the revenue records of …
Ram Sewak filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on Plot Nos. 503, 537 and 700 in Village Sakhaila, Jaunpur. The encroachments were made by individuals who had raised unauthorized constructions, and proceedings under Section 136 of the U.P. …
In PIL No. 4051 of 2025, petitioner Sumit Tomar sought a court direction to respondents 3 and 4 to remove alleged illegal encroachments by respondents 5‑7 on Plot Nos. 524 and 525 (recorded as Banjar and Pokhar) in Village Deta Khurd, Aligarh. The Deputy District Magistrate filed an affidavit …
The High Court reviewed its earlier order dated 6 March 2025 that had allowed a writ petition challenging the mutation of land records in favour of the review applicants, who were the married sisters of the deceased Bhumidhar Beerbal @ Ramesh Chandra. The court examined the succession provisions …
Petitioner Murari filed a writ petition challenging two orders—one dated 23 September 2025 issued by the District Magistrate, Bareilly, and another dated 29 March 2025 issued by the Tehsildar (Sadar), Bareilly—on the ground that they were passed in violation of the procedural requirements laid down …
Durga Charan and another filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 01.07.2025 that dismissed their application filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners contended that the order was liable to be challenged before the High Court. The respondents, the State of U.P. …
The petitioner filed a supplementary affidavit seeking to have an impleadment application allowed in an appeal under Section 67(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. He contended that the complainant was neither a necessary nor a proper party and therefore should not be impleaded as a …
The petitioners, Bindu Kumar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Badalapur to decide their representation dated 23‑01‑2026 under Section 24(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to deliver possession of land and demolish illegal …
The Gaon Sabha initiated proceedings against the petitioner under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which were later dropped by the Assistant Collector. The Gaon Sabha filed a recall and stay application, which the court allowed. The petitioner then filed a statutory appeal under Section …
The petitioner, Sahab Lal, challenged an order dated 08.05.2023 that quashed eviction proceedings initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The State appealed the quash order under Section 67(5), and the Additional District Magistrate set aside the quash order, directing a fresh …
The petitioner challenged the order of the Additional District Magistrate/Additional Collector (Civil Supply), Prayagraj, which set aside an earlier order quashing eviction proceedings and remanded the matter for a fresh decision with a hearing. The petition sought a direction that the Assistant …
Firoz Ahmed filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing the State to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Gata No. 901 Ka (0.3560 ha) in Village Vairagal, Basti, and to compel the District Magistrate to decide his application dated 30‑Oct‑2023. The State Law Officer informed …
The Gram Sabha initiated proceedings against Qayyum Ahmad, which were later dropped by the Assistant Collector on 17‑08‑2021. Gulam Husain, who was not a party to those proceedings, appealed the order under Section 65(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, but the appeal was dismissed by the Additional …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 29‑12‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Shikarpur, which had dropped proceedings initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 against private respondents for alleged illegal occupation of land reserved for public purpose. The …
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 seeking mandamus to remove alleged illegal encroachments on government land (plots 2016 and 2093) in Konch, Jalaun, and to compel revenue authorities to decide a representation dated 27‑02‑2025. The respondents contended that the …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on land registered as Ambedkar Park and pond, which belongs to the Gram Sabha as public utility land. The petitioner highlighted eight pending cases …
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing the State to evict illegal occupants from Araji No. 1062Sa, a 31.4170‑hectare revenue land in Ghazipur, after a Tehsildar’s order of ejectment and damages (maintained in appeal under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, …
Petitioner Toulan Gupta filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Handia, Prayagraj, to decide a representation dated 16 May 2023 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that Section 24(3) mandates that such …
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachment on pond land in Jaunpur and to act as per an apex court direction. The State, through its standing counsel, objected, contending that …
The petitioner, Rashid Ali, filed a writ petition alleging that he had not encroached upon the adjacent chak road. The court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to demarcate his land, which was essential to establish the claim. Consequently, the court found no evidence of encroachment …
The petitioner, Raje Lal Uttam, filed a writ petition under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking relief against an order dated 18‑11‑2024. The petition referenced a certified copy of an earlier order dated 11‑07‑2025 in Writ C No. 18359/2022, but failed to attach that copy …
The petitioner, Smt Rama Devi Shukla, filed a writ petition under Section 101 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, challenging an order dated 23 April 2025 passed by Respondent No.4. The petitioner sought dismissal of the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed with liberty to challenge the …
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking an order to remove alleged illegal encroachments on public utility land (Arazi No.599 Ka) by respondents 6 to 13, relying on an earlier order dated 23‑04‑2025 issued under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The Nagar …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 11.08.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Moradabad Division under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court observed that the petitioners have a statutory alternative remedy – a second appeal under the III Schedule of the same Code – and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate to consider their representation dated 26‑09‑2025 for entry of their names as legal heirs of a deceased in the revenue records. The court examined the representation and noted that such relief is governed by Section …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 29 August 2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Jaunpur, under Section 38(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which was initiated by respondent No.6, Sri Prakash. The Court noted that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any prejudice caused …
The petitioner, Gulam Husain, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Machali Sahar, Jaunpur, to decide Suit No.7354 of 2025 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within the stipulated period. The petition did not request any relief against the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar to decide their representation dated 23.01.2026, wherein they requested entry of their names as legal heirs in the revenue records. The Court examined the representation and noted that such …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar to decide a representation dated 23 January 2026, wherein they requested entry of their names as legal heirs of a deceased in the revenue records. The Court examined the representation and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Meja, Prayagraj, to decide their restoration application (No. RST/9021 of 2025) filed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within the prescribed period. The petition arose from a …
The petitioner, Mewati Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ghazipur, to decide an application filed under Section 67-A(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Case No.14179 of 2025). The petition was filed after the application had already been submitted …
The Mahant Ram Singh Durga Mandir Trust claimed ownership of a 0.544‑hectare parcel of land in Diha village, Prayagraj, on which a temple and a house were constructed about fifty years ago. The Trust, belonging to the OBC category, filed an application on 29 January 2026 before the Sub‑Divisional …
The petitioner, Vyasmuni, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402539) filed under Section 67-A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …
Gangotri Devi filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue case (No.T202605440402532) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of …
The petitioner, Deenanath, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402543) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that an inordinate amount …
The petitioner, Swaminath, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (Case No. T202605440402536) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Gagandev, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402545) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse …
The petitioner, Bahadur, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue matter (Case No. T202605440402538) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …
The petitioner, Subhash, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (Case No. T202605440402533) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable …
The petitioner, Vijay, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a case (No.T202605440402551) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of …
The petitioner, Sukdev, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402540) filed under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …
Hari filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402547) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of time, no …
Ganesh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue case (No. T202605440402549) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that an …
The petitioner, Bunela, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (No. T202605440402531) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an order dated 17 May 2025 in which the District Collector entertained an application by a private tenure holder concerning possession of land that was already the subject of a civil suit. The petitioners argued that the …
The petitioner, Kartar Singh @ Kaushal Bharti, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the speedy disposal of a restoration application pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Etmadpur, under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration application, filed on 13 March …
The petitioners, Ram Datt Singh Yadav and two others, filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State and its officials to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by respondent No. 6 on a plot recorded as Navin Parti in Ghazipur district. The State submitted that a proceeding under Section …
The High Court of Allahabad was hearing a contempt application (Civil) No. 6210 of 2024 filed by Sudarshan Chauhan against Santosh Shukla, Tehsildar. The contempt petition arose because the writ court, in a prior writ petition (PIL No. 1523 of 2023), had directed the opposite party to complete …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking to quash a Tehsildar's order dated 4 November 2024, which held that no encroachment existed on public utility land (Gata No. 440) in Samara village, and to compel a fresh inquiry under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code. The petition arose …
