Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

U.P. Tenancy Act

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR.versusRAVI KUMAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 55018 May 2023Case Partly allowed

The dispute concerned a 183‑bigha parcel of land in Haripur, Nainital, originally leased in 1924 under the Government Grants Act of 1895. The lease was allegedly transferred by a 1947 sale deed, but the deed’s nature—whether it conveyed title or merely lease‑hold rights—was contested. The respondents claimed ownership

SMT. CHATRO WIDOW OF NAND RAM AND ORS.versusSAHAYAK SANCHALAK CHAKBANDI, MEERUT AND ORS.

1996 INSC 147211 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Jallo purchased the proprietary right of a Zamindari estate in 1933 and became the khudkhash-holder. She later inducted her husband Tunda as a tenant, who died in 1947‑48. After the enactment of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, a dispute arose over who succeeded to the estate of either Tunda or

RAJESHWAR DAYAL AND ORS.versusAVNEESH KUMAR AVASTHI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 1844 April 2002Dismissed

The Lala Nanak Chand Trust leased a plot in Meerut to trustee Bateshwar Dayal for 30 years with a renewal clause. After the lease expired, the Trust sued for possession and obtained a decree; the lessee’s heirs later sought specific performance of the renewal clause, but their suit was dismissed as time‑barred. While t

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search