Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1999

7 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S. SHREE SIDHBALI STEELS LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2011 INSC 5820 January 2011Dismissed

The petitioners, industrial units in the hill areas of Uttar Pradesh, claimed a 33.33% Hill Development Rebate on electricity charges granted under a 1996 notification issued pursuant to Section 49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. Subsequent notifications reduced the rebate to 17% and finally withdrew it entirely

M/S BADRI KEDAR PAPER PVT. LTD.versusU.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMN. & ORS.

2008 INSC 150619 December 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, M/s Badri Kedar Paper Pvt Ltd, challenged the withdrawal of a circular issued by U.P. Power Corporation Ltd that affected the surcharge for a guaranteed 500‑hour power supply. The issue was whether the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (UPERC) alone has exclusive jurisdiction to determine a

TORRENT POWER LIMITEDversusU.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS

2025 INSC 83814 July 2025Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined a petition filed by an individual (respondent No.4) before the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (UPERC) seeking an investigation under Section 128 of the Electricity Act, 2003 into a Distribution Franchisee Agreement (DFA) between Torrent Power Limited (the appellant) and the d

L.M.L. LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2007 INSC 129713 December 2007Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd (UPPCL) could retrospectively impose a 15% surcharge after issuing circulars that allowed consumers to opt out of a guaranteed 500‑hour supply, and whether the doctrine of promissory estoppel barred such action. The Court held that where UPPCL made

MUKUL KUMAR TYAGIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 8325 November 2024Case Allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation (UPPCL) advertised for 2,211 Technician Grade‑II posts requiring a Certificate of 80‑hour Course on Computer Concepts (CCC) to be produced at the interview. Candidates who produced the CCC certificate at the interview were selected and issued appointment letters on 14 July 2015. A Hi

PASCHIMANCHAL VIDYUTVITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.versusM/SADARSH TEXTILES & ANR.

2014 INSC 8293 December 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a policy decision of the Uttar Pradesh Government dated 14‑June‑2006, which provided a flat‑rate electricity subsidy for power‑loom bunkers, could be extended by the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission to industries using HV‑2 connections. The Court held that the State Gov

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search