Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980

7 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIAversusBOARD OF MANG. DAYANAND COLLEGE OF LAW AND ORS.

2006 INSC 92028 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Bar Council of India (BCI) challenged two Allahabad High Court writ orders that upheld the appointment of a philosopher, respondent No. 5, as Principal of Dayanand College of Law despite his lack of legal qualifications. The High Court had held that the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973, being a later stat

DR. MANOJ KUMAR RAWATversusSTATE OF UP & ORS.

2026 INSC 50819 May 2026Dismissed

The appellant, a wait‑listed candidate for principal posts in non‑government aided colleges, was recommended for appointment to a PG college on 3 August 2022 but did not join due to family circumstances and later sought posting to another college. The Director, relying on Section 13(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Educa

DR. RAM DEEN MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2009 INSC 55817 April 2009Disposed off

Dr. Ram Deen Maurya and Dr. Madhu Tandon both applied for transfer to a vacant Reader post at D.A.V. Post Graduate College, Lucknow, obtaining No Objection Certificates (NOCs) from their respective parent colleges. The State Government granted permission to transfer Maurya, prompting Tandon to file a writ petition whic

VEERENDRA KR. GAUTAM AND OTHERSversusKARUNA NIDHAN UPADHYAY AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 53315 July 2016Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the selection of principals for degree and postgraduate colleges in Uttar Pradesh, where the Higher Education Services Commission had varied its screening norms and called an excessive number of candidates, some of whom were allegedly ineligible. The petitioners argued that earlier withdrawn

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ETC.

1995 INSC 87812 December 1995Dismissed

Santosh Kumar Singh was appointed as a lecturer in Agronomy at Durgaji Post Graduate College while still a student, first on 1 January 1984 and later on 1 October 1985, despite not possessing the minimum qualifications prescribed by the University Statute. The appellant claimed that the ad‑hoc appointments were permiss

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusDEEP NARAIN TRIPATHI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4928 April 1996Dismissed

The respondent was appointed as an ad‑hoc lecturer in 1985 at a college affiliated to Purvanchal University (formerly Gorakhpur University) after selection by a committee and approval by the Vice‑Chancellor. The 1991 Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission (Amendment) Ordinance introduced Section 31‑C, allow

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusBHARAT SINGH AND ORS.

2011 INSC 1908 March 2011Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two questions arising from the selection of principals for aided/affiliated degree and postgraduate colleges in Uttar Pradesh. First, it held that the High Court was correct in quashing the appointment of a Divisional Commissioner as an enquiry officer because a parallel state inquiry would d

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search