Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Workmen Compensation Act, 1923

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

OM PARKASH BATISHversusRANJIT @ RANBIR KAUR AND OTHERS

2008 INSC 52524 April 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, Om Parkash Batish, owned a residential building and had engaged a casual worker, Ram Lal, for a short period to carry out repair work. While on the roof of an adjoining textile mill, Ram Lal suffered an electric shock and died. The respondents filed a claim for compensation under the Workmen Compensation

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusSORUMAI GOGOI AND ORS.

2008 INSC 18914 February 2008Case Allowed

Bipul Gogoi, employed as a driver, disappeared on 9 October 1996 and was later declared a proclaimed offender for absconding with the vehicle. His parents claimed compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, asserting his death in the course of employment. The Commissioner and the High Court awarded compensat

MALLIKARJUNA G. HIREMATHversusBRANCH MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.& ANR.

2009 INSC 16812 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, a driver employed by the appellant, was directed to take a vehicle with passengers to a temple. While at the temple he slipped on the steps of a pond and drowned. His wife claimed compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, alleging that the death occurred in the course of and arising out of hi

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search