Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

35028 judgments · newest first · showing 35001–35028

Krishna Kumar Yadav @ K. K. Yadav @ Pradhan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishna Kumar Yadav was implicated in a fraud case alleging a loss of Rs. 11,11,447, with charges under IPC sections 420, 406 and 506/34. The petitioner contended that he was in Malaysia at the time, that no money was credited to his account, and that the informant had falsely implicated him. He …

Pintu Paswan @ Raj Kishore PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Paswan sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor and destruction of 1500 litres of semi‑fermented mahua. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, argued that no arrest was made, …

Ful Kumari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ful Kumari Devi, owner of a motorcycle from which 102.375 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was a …

Abdul BarikversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Abdul Barik applied for anticipatory bail before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to obtain regular bail. The Court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal and directing that the …

Birendra Rai @ Birendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Birendra Rai, the owner of a vehicle from which 261.54 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, was not in possession at the time of …

Naval Kishor YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naval Kishor Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 2006.64 litres of liquor from a pick‑up and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

Pradip ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pradip Chaudhary was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 25 litres of liquor and 180 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He applied for anticipatory …

Afroz @ Md. AfrozversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Afroz, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 4 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested on the spot, and …

Ankit Kumar @ Ankit SahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and Aniket Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, their counsel requested permission to withdraw the application, preferring to surrender and seek regular bail. The Court granted the request, dismissing the …

Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Randhir Kumar, the owner of two scooties from which 70 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C., claiming he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that others misused his vehicles. He argued that his clean antecedent and lack …

ANARJEET YADAV @ INARJEET YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants – six individuals named Anarjeet Yadav and others – were convicted by the Fast Track Court, Khagaria, on 18 November 2019 for offences under Sections 147 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and were released on bond under Section 4 of the Probation Act. They filed a criminal appeal (SJ) …

Amit Kumar @ Pintu Sharma @ Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged killing of a deceased person. The prosecution alleged murder, while the petitioner’s counsel argued that the death was …

Aryan Yadav @ Tarkeshwar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Aryan Yadav, was implicated in a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the BNS. He applied for relief, arguing that no injury was caused and that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. The court examined the nature of the allegations and ordered that the …

Shyam KishoreversusState Of Bihar and Anr

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Shyam Kishore filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Siya Ram Singh. The petition was presented without any counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated notices. The State's Additional Public Prosecutor and counsel for the second respondent …

Saikat Sen GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, employees of Masters Development Management (India) Private Ltd, were named in an FIR filed by Tapovardhan Prakritik Chikitsa Kendra alleging breach of a construction contract, overcharging and non‑completion of work. They contended that the dispute was civil, governed by an …

Arvind Yadav @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Arvind Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. The State was represented by Advocate Mr. Bharat Lal. The presiding judge noted the absence of …

Gyanendra MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gyanendra Mishra, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking quashing of the Excise Commissioner’s order that confiscated his Maruti Suzuki Brezza and directing the release of the vehicle. He alleged that the confiscation order was passed without proper consideration of …

Ram Chandra Rai and OrsversusMd. Tanveer Azam

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioners, Ram Chandra Rai and others, filed a civil miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf at any stage, including the final hearing date. The court observed that the petitioners appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the case. …

ASRAF ALI @ MD. ALIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The appellant, Asraf Ali, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.5448 of 2023 before the Patna High Court arising from PS case No.281 of 2023. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant, while the respondent No.2, Pankaj Bharti, was represented by Mr. Praveen Kumar and the State of Bihar by Special …

SUNITA RAI @ SUNITA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The appellants Sunita Rai, Seopujan Rai and Pankaj Rai filed Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4679 of 2023 arising from a 2022 case in Madhubani. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants on two consecutive dates, 06.05.2025 and 24.06.2025, while the Special Public Prosecutor represented the State. The …

Munni Devi @ Munna DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Munni Devi, Kabiya Devi and Mahendra Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 20472 of 2025) before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 15-05-2025 despite repeated notices. The same non‑appearance …

Bijendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

CONSIGNED

The petitioners, a group of 15 landowners, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of 75.96 acres of land for the Patna Metro Rail Depot under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARRA). They sought certiorari …

Prasad SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Petitioner Prasad Sahani instituted a criminal miscellaneous proceeding against the State of Bihar and Sudhir Kumar Sah. An application related to the case was earlier dismissed on 3 December 2024 for non‑prosecution. On 4 March 2025, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, indicating a …

Manohar Lal AhujaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Manohar Lal Ahuja filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and three other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be …

Manohar Lal AhujaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Manohar Lal Ahuja filed a petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and three respondents. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending petition. The court heard the arguments and considered whether it could allow the withdrawal. It held …

Ashok Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, was granted provisional bail on 11-09-2024 on the condition that he would return the entire money to the informant in four equal monthly installments. He failed to pay even the first installment. The court examined whether the breach of this condition justified …

Km PuneetaversusThe State Of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Seven petitioners filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and various education officials. The petitioners failed to appear in court despite repeated notices, and no counsel represented them. The State and the Bihar Public Service Commission were represented by …