Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

35028 judgments · newest first · showing 34801–35000

Anil Kumar @ Anil @ Anii Yadav @ Anil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Anil Kumar, his son Aniket Kumar and wife Sunita Devi, feared arrest in a criminal case (Rampur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant, his wife and children during a dispute over electricity connection. The prosecution charged them under several sections of the …

Pawan Tiwari @ Pawan Kumar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pawan Tiwari, a retired army personnel, feared arrest in a criminal case (Shahpur P.S. Case No.158/2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023. He alleged that the informant falsely implicated him, claiming a raid on his house on 16 June 2025 where his family allegedly …

Saddam Miyan @ Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam MiyanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saddam Miyan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 225 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at …

Kuraisha KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Amnour P.S. Case No.219 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging involvement in a riot. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners were part of two groups that blocked a road …

Sudish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Dighwara PS Case No. 243 of 2025) filed under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with other accused, …

Md. JafrunversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jafrun, was named as an accused in a POCSO case because he is the father of the alleged offender, Md. Afzal, who is accused of sexually exploiting Muskan Khatoon under a false pretext of marriage. The petitioner contends that no specific allegation of sexual assault is made …

Lalu Kumar @ Lalu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a raid recovered a loaded pistol and a knife from his residence. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was in illegal possession of the firearms, while the …

Kuldeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Kuldeep Kumar, a branch manager of Bharat Inclusion Financial Limited, was implicated in a fraud where fingerprints of customers were allegedly used to withdraw Rs. 76,768 from six accounts. The alleged fraud occurred on 2 September 2023, but the FIR was filed only on 4 April 2025. The petitioner …

Alauddin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Alauddin Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Sections 223, 152, 196 and 197 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita relating to a Muharram procession. The prosecution alleged that a flag of Philistine was displayed during the procession, …

Rakesh Kumar @ RockyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged illegal arms trading, with charges under Sections 111 and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR named other accused, and a police seizure …

Mantu Rajak @ Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mantu Rajak, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 351, 352, 79, 77, 75, 57 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused Rupesh Kumar recorded obscene videos of an informant, blackmailed her and, together with other accused …

Golu Rai @ Abhishek RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Golu Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted an informant's leg with a sword. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging political victimisation …

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Dubey, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant, creating obscene videos of her, and threatening her death, with charges under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the BNS, Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petitioner sought …

Amarjit Kumar @ Amarjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Amarjit Kumar, was named in an FIR for robbery under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein three unknown persons allegedly looted Rs. 1,75,520 along with a laptop and a mobile phone. The investigation linked the petitioner to the crime based on a confessional statement and …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rita Devi, the petitioner, was arrested in connection with a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 29) after a co‑accused named her as a participant in the sale of 57.53 grams of smack. She contended that she was falsely implicated, had not …

Gori Shah @ Gori MohammadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of relatives from Barharia, Siwan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including sections dealing with criminal conspiracy, unlawful assembly and assault. The FIR alleged that they assaulted …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ankit Kumar was arrested in a Siwan raid where police recovered 32 grams of a narcotic (smack) and charged him under Sections 8 and 20(b)ii(a) of the NDPS Act, 1985. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the seizure lacked a forensic laboratory (FSL) report confirming the …

Rakesh Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Rakesh Kumar Jha applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 395 of the IPC. The State argued that he had been declared an absconder and that proceedings under Section 82 of the CrPC were underway to secure his appearance, rendering anticipatory bail unavailable. The court …

Sumit Ranjan @ Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sumit Ranjan, sought pre‑arrest bail after the police registered a case alleging offences under sections 318(4) and 319(2) of the BNS and sections 65, 66, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, in collusion with co‑accused, …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay BasforeversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft of gold ornaments worth Rs. 3 lakh, alleged under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the B.N.S. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was recovered from him, and that he had not been produced before a TIP. …

SHAIL KUMARI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Shail Kumari Devi, the petitioner, sought pre‑arrest bail after learning that a case had been registered against her under sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the BNS. The FIR alleges that she, along with co‑accused, kidnapped the minor daughter of an informant, who remains missing. The court considered …

Lali DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Lali Devi and Gayatri Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry death case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was murdered due to non‑payment of dowry, implicating several family members. The petitioners …

Vijay Shankar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vijay Shankar Tiwari and Bhagwati Tiwari, were named in an FIR for alleged assault on an informant under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the charge of assault was vague, no specific overt act was detailed, and that they have …

Ajay KumarversusThe Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four residents of Patna, applied online for new electricity connections to their houses and claim to have fulfilled all statutory conditions. The Bihar State Power Holding Company refused to grant the connections, alleging that no application had been filed. The petitioners …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar was arrested in September 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(B)(ii)B and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 after 2 kg of ganja was recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the seized quantity …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail after learning that he was being implicated in a case under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S., although his name was not originally mentioned in the FIR. The prosecution alleged that six unknown persons, during a robbery of an informant, stole cash, a …

Himanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Himanshu Kumar and Kapildev Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 303(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The FIR alleged that they, along with others, assaulted an informant with a …

Solu Kumar @ Ashik @ Solu Kumar AsikversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Solu Kumar (also known as Ashik), was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 139 and 87 of the B.N.S. Act, based on an informant's allegation that his niece had gone missing after being seen with the petitioner. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner’s …

Umesh Yadav @ Umesh Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Umesh Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for alleged black‑marketing of wheat and rice from his PDS shop, with a reported shortage of 7.77 quintals of wheat and 116.57 quintals of rice. He contended that the allegations were false, that …

Pintu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Pintu Singh (owner) and Nagendra Kumar (driver), sought pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a case under sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 for allegedly transporting coal without a valid …

Mutur RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of fifteen individuals from Damodarpur village, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023. They alleged that the dispute arose from a petty fight resulting in injuries on both sides, and the …

Sanjay SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and rioting. The prosecution alleged that Sharma assaulted the son of an informant with a sword, causing injuries, and cited …

Satish Ray @ Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Satish Ray was arrested in connection with a case of petroleum theft involving alleged tampering of a pipeline, charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S., P.M.P. Act, Protection of Civil Rights Act and the E.C. Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged against an unknown person, no …

Imam Ansari @ Iman Ansari @ Inam Ansari @ Imam HasanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Imam Ansari, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault and threats against an informant and her family under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that the incident stemmed from a petty dispute between co‑villagers, resulting only in simple …

Kesharinandan Ram @ Keshari RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kesharinandan Ram, brother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was implicated in a dowry‑death case under Section 80(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence, clean antecedents and that the primary accused – the husband – was already in …

Chandan Yadav @ Chandan GopeversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 394, 411 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that on 31-10-2023 the petitioner was part of a gang that robbed an informant, but the petitioner’s name was not in the FIR …

Sunil ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sunil Chaudhary, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel argued that the petitioner no longer required anticipatory bail. The Court …

Akhilesh NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Nat, a co‑owner of a house in Sasaram, Rohtas, faced an FIR alleging human trafficking after a raid uncovered minor girls in objectionable conditions with contraceptives. He is charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) …

Bablu Rai @ Bablu Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bablu Rai, sought bail in connection with Doriganj Police Station Case No. 217 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). He was accused of striking an informant on the head during an alleged interception, causing a head …

Chandan Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Chaudhary, was arrested in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case after a police raid recovered 4,500 ampules of Leegesic injection containing 2.7 grams of buprenorphine. He claimed he was falsely implicated, that the ampules were intended for medical …

Krishna DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Krishna Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assisting her brother in kidnapping a minor girl and threatening her to facilitate a marriage. The prosecution’s case …

Mohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault and dowry harassment under IPC sections 341, 323, 498, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The prosecution alleges that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted the informant for failing to …

Krishna Mohan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Krishna Mohan Yadav, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case under sections 8(c), 20(B)(ii) B and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The FIR was based on a raid where a co-accused, Rajesh Kumar, was caught with 2 kg of ganja and allegedly implicated the petitioner. The petitioner …

Bittu Yadav @ Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Bittu Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case originally filed under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, later amended to include Section 137(2) of the same code and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The …

Bhola @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhola @ Sunil Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 126(2), 127(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and section 25(1‑b)/a/35 of the Arms Act, alleging he carried a pistol and threatened an informant. He contended that the …

Rozida KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, parents of a minor orchestra dancer, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, Immoral Trafficking Act, POCSO Act, Child Labour Act and Juvenile Justice Act. The victim’s statement indicated that she handed …

Shivam Singh @ Shalu SamratversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivam Singh was arrested in connection with a police case alleging extortion through Facebook Messenger, charged under Sections 308(4), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The petitioner contended that his identity had been misused by unknown persons and that his brother had filed a cyber‑crime complaint, …

Musafir Mian @ Musafir AamalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Musafir Mian, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he had spoken with an informant's married daughter (now deceased) and allegedly instigated her suicide. The petitioner contended that he had no role in the deceased's …

Goutam Das @ Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Goutam Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging assault with a sickle on the son of an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner inflicted head injuries, citing specific sections of the B.N.S. and an injury report. The petitioner contended that the …

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 309(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault and robbery. The prosecution alleged that three persons assaulted a motorist and stole his mobile phone, and the petitioner’s name appeared only in the confessional …

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault case (Nirmali P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025) under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a gang that intercepted an informant, assaulted him, and stole money and a mobile …

Suman Kumar @ Suman Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suman Kumar, was arrested under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after police recovered an iron desi katta from his waist. He pleaded that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and had been in custody since 5 September 2025. The prosecution opposed bail, …

Mohammad Jawed @ Moti @ Jawed @ Md. MotiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mohammad Jawed, was accused of assaulting an informant and his son on 19-12-2024, allegedly using a lathi, danda, fist and an iron rod that caused a head injury. The prosecution charged him under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

Dileep Paswan @ Dileep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dileep Paswan, was arrested in connection with alleged kidnapping and related offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that he was merely present at the house and not involved in the …

Awadhesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Awadhesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault with an iron rod on the husband of an informant, under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged the assault, while the petitioner claimed innocence, citing an agnatic …

Sushil Mandal @ Sushil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Four petitioners from Belari village sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault with an iron rod and other violent acts against the informant Sudama Devi and her family. The prosecution alleged that petitioners 1 …

Md AkhtarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Akhtar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. concerning an alleged assault and robbery. The prosecution alleged that four miscreants attacked the informant and stole his belongings, while the petitioner was not named in the FIR but was …

Rajendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, were implicated in a land‑dispute altercation that led to the alleged assault of an informant, resulting in a simple injury as per the medical report. An FIR dated 28‑06‑2025 charged them under sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the …

Mukesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Paswan was arrested in a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 alleging extortion and related offences. The petitioner, who has four prior criminal convictions, applied for bail, arguing that the FIR does not specifically implicate him in demanding or receiving the …

Prashant Kumar Sharma @ Prashant SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Prashant Kumar Sharma and Avinash Kumar Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault with a sword. The prosecution alleged that on 23 July 2025 the petitioners, along with others, …

Kuldeep ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kuldeep Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly receiving 4.84 kg of ganja from an accomplice, Sikandar Kumar. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting no …

Tinku Thakur @ Tinku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Tinku Thakur, filed an anticipatory bail application under the criminal procedure. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The learned judge considered whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw the anticipatory …

Gauri kumari @ Gori KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are family members of co-accused Suresh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged kidnapping and related offences. The prosecution alleged that Suresh Paswan abducted the informant’s …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunny Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging that he pretended to marry a woman, had physical relations with her, and later refused to marry her, invoking sections 69, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioner argued that the relationship was consensual, both …

Kiran DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Kiran Devi, Shivnath Kumar, Dina Paswan and Ujjawal Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 324(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. They were already on police bail under Section 35 of the same Act. The State argued that there was no apprehension of …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, attempted marriage of a minor, and offences under the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had enticed the informant's minor daughter away for marriage, invoking IPC sections 363 and 366A and …

Birendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Birendra Thakur filed a civil writ petition challenging actions of the Circle Officer, Chakia, and other officials of the Bihar government. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition while retaining the right to pursue other appropriate remedies against the impugned action. The court …

Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Yadav and Nitish Kumar Mandal applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 108 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioners argued that they were not …

Ranjit RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Rai, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 37(b)(c) of the Excise Act. He alleged that the informant, his aunt, fabricated the complaint due to a …

Ratanlal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ratanlal Mahto filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, he sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the petitioner's request and, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

Sakuntala DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sakuntala Devi, an SC/ST landless woman, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the district authorities to settle a parcel of government land for her home, invoking a Bihar Government circular. She had previously applied to the Circle Officer on 20‑01‑2025, but no action was taken. The Court …

Subodh ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subodh Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession …

Mintu Kumar Upadhyay @ Ajay Tiwari @ Mintu UpadhyayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mintu Kumar Upadhyay, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with a sword causing a simple head injury to an informant, and faces charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean antecedent and arguing that the injury …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raushan Kumar, who has been in custody since 4 September 2025, applied for bail in a theft case (Shivajinagar P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 331(4), 305 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that a theft occurred on 30 August 2025 at a …

Sandip YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sandip Yadav, arrested during a police raid at Dinesh Yadav’s house, sought bail for offences under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 25(1‑aa), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, 1959. The prosecution alleged recovery of a mobile phone from the …

Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Kumar SumanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Sintu Kumar and Rakesh Kumar, were arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related assault case (Baheri P.S. Case No. 192 of 2025) involving injuries to the informant and his wife. They sought bail, contending that the injuries were simple and that a counter‑case (Baheri P.S. …

Bijendra Singh @ Vijendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bijendra Singh, Munarik Singh and Manish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to offences such as wrongful restraint, assault, and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleged that on 2 August …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mukesh Kumar and Rakesh Kumar applied for bail after an FIR (Case No. 338 of 2025) alleged they committed extortion, assault, and theft of Rs.25,000, invoking several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The petitioners contended they were merely consumers of the informant's PDS …

Md. NomanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md Noman, a daily‑wage labourer, was implicated in a case alleging obstruction of a public servant and assault on a mining officer, invoking multiple offences under the Bihar Minerals and Substances Act and the Bihar Minerals Amendments Rules. The prosecution alleged that he forcibly …

Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several offences of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). The FIR alleged that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his brother, causing injuries. The petitioner’s counsel …

Govinda Nutt @ Govinda NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Govinda Nutt, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 317(5) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita concerning stolen articles recovered from a co‑accused’s house. The prosecution’s case relied on the confessional statements …

Kundan Singh @ Kundan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Kundan Singh and Paramanand Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code for alleged firing and assault during a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that Singh fired at an informant and Singh assaulted the …

Bhola PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners sought bail for Sunil Paswan (petitioner No.3) who was implicated in a case involving assault on an informant and her mother‑in‑law under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The petitioner argued that the incident arose from a trivial dispute over garbage, that …

Gaurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The High Court heard a pre‑arrest bail application filed by three petitioners in a case involving alleged assault and other offences under the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The petitioners sought bail for all three, but the counsel for petitioner No.2 withdrew his application, which the court …

Abhinandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhinandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 1080 litres of liquor from two vehicles he owned. He argued that he was not present at the time of …

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of six relatives, were apprehended of being arrested in a case alleging assault on an informant and his wife, with offences listed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in a scuffle and …

Monu BhardwajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Monu Bhardwaj, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 565 bags of DAP fertilizer from a truck, alleged to be part of illegal storage and black‑marketing under Sections 111(2)(b) and 111(3) of the BNS, Section 7 of the Fertilization Control Order, 1985 and Section 7 of the …

Poonam DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Poonam Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a pregnant woman who died allegedly due to poisoning, was arrested in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 304B, 328, 120B and 34. The prosecution alleged that the deceased's in‑laws demanded money and subsequently administered poison, leading to her …

SANJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Choudhary sought bail after a complaint was lodged under sections 27b(ii) and 28 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, alleging that a non‑licensed medical store was operating in a clinic he ran. The prosecution alleged that a drug inspector discovered the illegal store …

Sikender Sahani @ Sikendra Sahani @ Sakindra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikender Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 122.7 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, the …

Ramdhari MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ramdhari Mandal, who is in custody, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 20(b)(ii) and 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, alleging that 14 kg of ganja was recovered from the terrace of his house during a raid. The prosecution contended that the …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar was arrested in a POCSO case alleging that he enticed a minor girl, the daughter of the informant, under the pretext of marriage, had sexual intercourse with her, and threatened the mother. The prosecution presented the mother’s complaint, while the petitioner contended that the …

Ramesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Ramesh Kumar filed a writ petition alleging that the construction of a Panchayat Bhawan was being carried out on his private land in Saran district and sought an order to stop the construction and remove the materials. The respondents, including the State of Bihar and various district …

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prince Kumar, detained in connection with an extortion case under Sections 308(2) and 308(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, applied for bail. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement, as the petitioner’s name does not appear in the FIR and no other incriminating …

Raju Kumar @ Raju Kushwaha @ Raju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery at gunpoint (Punaura PS Case No. 21 of 2025) and charged under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and was falsely implicated because he possessed a list of similar …

Om RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Om Ranjan filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Bihar and its agencies. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ application and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered whether it could permit …

RijwanullhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rijwanullha, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Jiyapokhar PS Case No. 26 of 2025) involving alleged assault with an iron rod during a land dispute. The FIR listed offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 352, 303(2) and later 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …

Om Prakash Kumar @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Om Prakash Kumar, who is in custody, applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, 1985. The prosecution alleged that 950 g of charas was recovered from a vehicle and three …

Bharat Singh @ Bharat Singh MauryaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bharat Singh, was accused in a land‑dispute related case (Krishnabraham P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025) of assaulting an informant and her family, leading to injuries. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the injury he caused was simple, the co‑accused caused a grievous injury, …

Sahil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sahil Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have occurred at a petrol pump where he and others were accused of snatching cash and a mobile phone. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on the confessional statement of …

Raju Singh @ Rajeev Singh @ Rajiv SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Singh, a 61‑year‑old man, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 29, 30 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly supplying illegal firearms and ammunition. The prosecution’s case is based on a raid at the house of co‑accused Bechan Saday, who recovered a …

Gopi Chand Paswan @ Gopi Chand RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Gopi Chand Paswan, sought regular bail in a criminal case (Cr. Misc. No.87233 of 2025) registered under sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act (B.N.S.) relating to the alleged dowry‑related death of his daughter‑in‑law, Pushpa Devi. The prosecution alleged that the …

Pappu Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Rai, owner of a bus, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and did not have the liquor in his conscious possession; the allegation arose solely …

Nitish Bind @ Nitish Kumar @ Nitish BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Nitish Bind and Sanni Bind, sought pre‑arrest bail in connection with PS case No. 26 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including unlawful assembly, assault and extortion. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …

Sanni Kumar @ Shani Kumar @ Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged kidnapping of an informant's daughter under Sections 87, 142 and 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the victim was abducted, while the petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated and that …

Md. Samir @ Sunni @ Mohammad Samir KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Samir Khan, sought bail in a case registered under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S. Act concerning alleged robbery and assault. The prosecution alleged that the accused fired on the informant and stole cash and jewellery, but the petitioner was not named in the FIR and his name …

Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Avinash Kumar was arrested in a cyber‑crime case for allegedly creating a fake website that mimics the Patna High Court, violating Sections 337 and 336(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The FIR was lodged by the Registrar General after the fake site was discovered …

SANJEEV CHAUDHARY @ SHIVNATH CHODHARIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sanjeev Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his semi‑constructed house and from another person's house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor …

Mantu DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mantu Das was accused in Barabar Tourist Police Station Case No. 102 of 2025 for assaulting an informant with a farsha, khanti and iron rod, leading to serious injuries. He filed a pre‑arrest bail application, arguing that the FIR was omnibus, the injury was simple, and he has a fair antecedent. The …

Abdul RashidversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Abdul Rashid was arrested after a police search of a bus allegedly uncovered 22.5 kg of explosive material, leading to charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substance Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, is an elderly individual engaged in fire‑cracker …

Ankit Raj @ Ankit Kumar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 250 litres of liquor in a Santro car. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the vehicle was not his, and the only basis for his implication was a confessional …

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neeraj Kumar and Sudhir Kumar were arrested in connection with a robbery in which four to five miscreants, armed with a gun, allegedly robbed an informant of Rs. 7,000 and two motorcycles. The petitioners were charged under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and have prior criminal …

Manish Kumar Singhania @ Manish Kumar SinghaniyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Kumar Singhania applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging that 2,479.2 litres of liquor were recovered from two trucks, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession …

Amjad Ali @ RinkuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amjad Ali @ Rinku was arrested in a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act after a police raid recovered 40 grams of a smokable narcotic, cash and a weighing machine. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the drugs were thrown …

Raghu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four residents of Parsamadho village, sought pre‑arrest bail in connection with a criminal case (Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2023) that alleged offences under several IPC sections including assault, grievous hurt and robbery. The incident arose during a Panchayat where the …

Ajay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar Yadav, who was in judicial custody, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 20, 22 and 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, alleging that the FIR only implicated his father, Radhey Yadav, for concealing and selling ganja. The prosecution reported …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manish Kumar, a student with a clean record, applied for pre‑arrest bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025, which alleged he assaulted an informant with an iron rod causing serious injuries and was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner …

Manoj Kumar Mahto @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Mahto and Saroj Kumar Mahto were arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of an informant's tractor and demand for ransom, during which they allegedly assaulted two individuals, causing grievous and simple injuries. The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail, arguing …

Mantosh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mantosh Mandal and Annu Mandal (also known as Ashutosh Kumar Mandal) were arrested in connection with the disappearance and death of a neighbour's son, alleged to have been lured for fishing and later found drowned. The prosecution charged them under Sections 140(3), 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the …

Upendra Narayan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Upendra Narayan Yadav, a former Panchayat Secretary, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 420 and 204/34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging fraud in the non‑submission of teacher appointment documents for 2003‑2014. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and …

Manish Kumar @ Manish @ Videsh @ Videsh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with the recovery of 16.66 kg of poppy straw (doda) from platform No.1 of Gaya Ji railway station. The prosecution alleged that he was involved in the offence punishable under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that no …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged theft of a water lifting motor, alleged to have been stolen by unknown persons and recovered by a person named Chhotu Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in the theft, while the petitioner contended …

Laxman YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Yadav, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 444 of 2025) for alleged offences under Section 317(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, involving the recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not apprehended at the …

Shatrughan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shatrughan Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in connection with PS Sikti Case No. 133 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The incident involved a land dispute where the petitioner allegedly seized the informant while …

Gautam Kumar @ Gautam MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Gautam Kumar (aka Gautam Mandal) was arrested in connection with a case arising from a mob that blocked NH‑333 and attacked police personnel, resulting in injuries and property damage. He sought bail for offences listed under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 223, 121(2), 132, 109 and …

Ojindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ojindra Kumar sought pre‑arrest bail after being implicated in a case (PS‑148/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The alleged incident on 12‑07‑2025 involved a dispute where the petitioner was accused of firing at an …

Sampat Kumar @ Vikki @ BikkyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, including Sampat Kumar and others, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash a discharge order dated 13‑11‑2024 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge‑XVII, Bhagalpur in S.T. Case No. 405 of 2024. The case involved offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, …

Kamal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamal Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor and 6,000 litres of fermented Mahua solution from a public place. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught in possession, and that the …

Chandar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, involved in a land dispute, were accused of assaulting an informant's family, causing injuries and alleged theft. They applied for bail, arguing that the injuries to both sides were minor and that they have a fair antecedent. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of …

Tahir HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, relatives of the husband of the complainant, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged physical assault and torture for non‑payment of a Rs.2 lakh …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 58.1 litres of liquor from a government school corner. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession, …

Bobby KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bobby Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act, where the prosecution alleged that firearms, live and empty cartridges were recovered from his parental house and a mobile phone from his possession. The petitioner contended that he was …

Shivji ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shivji Thakur, the father‑in‑law of the deceased Aarti Kumari, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 80, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Aarti Kumari, married to Krishna Thakur, was subjected to dowry cruelty and subsequently …

Rajnish Kumar JhaversusThe Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of seven residents, applied for electricity connection to a house they constructed in Patna. The Bihar State Power Holding Company refused to grant the connection, alleging that no formal application had been filed. The petitioners contended that they had satisfied all …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving the illegal possession of arms and a narcotic offence, alleged to have occurred when police recovered a stolen scooter and arms from a house identified as belonging to a suspect named Moti Kumar. The petitioner contended that he was …

Sanjay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 128.5 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean …

Gaurav SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Gaurav Singh, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that his name appeared only in a confessional statement of another accused, Rudal Singh, and that no material was recovered from him. The prosecution argued …

Khurshid Alam @ Md. KhurshidversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Khurshid Alam, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration of title over land he and his family have occupied for decades, relying on a Gazette dated 11-11-2014 that declared tenancy rights after 30 years of possession. He requested that the State of Bihar and its revenue officials …

Renu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner Renu Devi filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a magistrate's order that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 341, 504 and 506 IPC based on a complaint alleging dowry‑related harassment and threats. The …

Manas Das @ Mansa Prasad @ Mansa DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Manas Das, sought bail in a case registered as Goraul P.S. Case No. 427 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code as per the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, who is the husband of the victim, abducted her when the …

Subodh Das @ Subodh Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Subodh Das was arrested in connection with an assault on an informant, alleged to have used a lathi, danda and iron rod, resulting in a fractured hand. The prosecution charged him under multiple sections of the BNS and sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act. The petitioner …

Rajnandan Bhagat @ Raj Nandan Prasad @ Raj Nandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajnandan Bhagat applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public canal. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, …

Vivek RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vivek Ram was implicated in a case (P.S. Case No. 447 of 2025) for allegedly recovering 509 litres of liquor from a poultry farm, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the recovery was made from a location adjacent to his premises, …

Manoj Ray @ Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Ray, a medical store owner, was arrested in a special POCSO case (No. 287 of 2025) for alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75, 352 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the informant was teased by the petitioner while …

Saroj Kumar VarunversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Saroj Kumar Varun was arrested in connection with a case alleging that 30 PAN cards and related items were recovered from his shop, leading to charges under Sections 338, 336(2), 340(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the seized items did not …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Arvind Kumar was arrested in connection with a case where 9.6 kg of ganja was recovered from a co‑accused, Najare Alam, who alleged that the drugs were being carried for Kumar. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and had been in judicial custody since …

Pitambar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shaligram Paswan and Nirdosh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the recovery site did …

Manju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Singh filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Aurangabad, which had partly confirmed a 2018 order granting her a one‑third share of land under Schedule‑VIII. She also requested cancellation of Jamabandi entries in the …

Ratnesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ratnesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 309(6) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, where Rs. 5,00,000, blank cheques and a passbook were reportedly stolen. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but a confessional …

Dablu Kumar @ Dabloo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Dablu Kumar and Ram Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly possessing 360 bottles of cough syrup containing codeine. They contended that the codeine concentration (0.2%) was below the 2.5% …

Dhiraj YadavversusThe STATE of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Dhiraj Yadav and Navin Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor from a public canal area. They argued that the liquor was not in their possession, the informant’s identity was …

Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Dilip Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he ordered his brother to kill an informant, resulting in the informant being shot in the arm. He faced multiple charges under the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, …

Asho YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asho Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Mani Bhushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mani Bhushan Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 171 litres of liquor from five sacks tied to a motorcycle. He contended that the police had not seized any liquor from his immediate possession and that the only information came from a …

Manoj Kumar Sah @ Manoj Sah @ Monoj SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Kumar Sah applied for bail in a case registered as Araria R.S. P.S. Case No. 168 of 2024 under Section 309(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The prosecution alleged that on 01-11-2024 a manager of a private company was intercepted by three bikers, who, at gunpoint, robbed him of Rs. …

Saroj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Saroj Paswan, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a secret tip led police to apprehend five armed miscreants, with two …

Raj Kumar @ Raju Bind @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted an informant while a co-accused, Chhotu, fired at the informant. The …

Md. Sartaz @ SartazversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Sartaz, sought bail in a case where 4.365 kg of ganja was seized from his residence and he was charged under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged possession of a substantial quantity of narcotics, while the petitioner claimed innocence, alleging …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioners Raushan Kumar and Sanni Kumar were arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that they were part of a mob that fired on the elder brother of an informant, resulting in the victim's death. The petitioners claimed they were merely present at the scene and had no active role, asserting …

Manoj RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, where police alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from an auto and 20 litres from a scooty, none of which were in his possession. The petitioner argued he was not the …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from public places. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar through The Vigilance

ALLOWED

Kundan Kumar was arrested on allegations of demanding Rs 3 lakh for mutation and receipt in collusion with a Circle Officer, under sections 7(a)(c), 12 and 61(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended 2018). The prosecution claimed the petitioner received the money and placed it on the …

Mahanth Chaudhary @ Mahanth ChaudhuryversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahanth Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 711 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the …

Gurmit kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gurmit Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered in 2018 for alleged cheating in a 10+2 examination, allegedly involving the exchange of answer keys via WhatsApp. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a conspiracy to cheat, invoking sections 420 and 120(b) …

Shaligram PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shaligram Paswan and Nirdosh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from a public area, and …

Deepak Paswan @ Deepak Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 46 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that no arrest was made at the scene, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and …

Robin Yadav @ Rabeen YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Robin Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after a country‑made pistol and a live cartridge were allegedly recovered from his possession. The petitioner contended that nothing was actually seized and that the police failed to comply …

Bhanu Yadav @ Bhanu Pratap YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bhanu Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleging assault on an informant with a weapon. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner inflicted a head injury using a 'Khanti'. The …

Ayush kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ayush Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging fraud, forgery and intimidation under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he produced false documents to induce the informant, Deepak Kumar, to pay Rs. 18,48,180 and later …

Jitendra Yadav @ JitoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, his counsel found difficulty in arguing and requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead surrender to seek regular bail. The Court granted …

Abhimanyu Paul @ Abhimanyu PalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Paul, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from his Hyundai car. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession of it, and that the seizure was solely …

Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Hira Lal Mahto, filed an application in the High Court of Patna in a criminal miscellaneous matter. Counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application and to file a fresh one with the necessary documents. The Court considered …

Tunni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Tunni Devi applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging possession of six litres of liquor at her residence, which is a joint family property. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Sitaram BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sitaram Bind, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21.5 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he had no conscious possession, has a clean antecedent, and …

Roopu Ram @ Rupu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Roopu Ram, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 11.25 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that …

Kanhaiya Paswan @ Kanhaiya Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8.1 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, …

Kallu Khatik @ Kalu KhatikversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kallu Khatik, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a public place. He contended that the liquor was not in his …

Santosh kumar @ Santosh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, facing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, applied for anticipatory bail. He contended that the seized vehicle was not in his possession, he was not the owner, and his …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging recovery of 171 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not present at …

Mayank Sarraf LuckyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mayank Sarraf Lucky, was implicated in a fraud case involving Rs.10.65 lakh where duplicate gold jewellery were allegedly sold and cheques issued were dishonoured. He was charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 138 of the …

Md. Kaith @ Md. KaifversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Kaith, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging outraging the modesty of an informant's daughter and other offences under various sections of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, asserting that the money‑transaction allegations pertained to co‑accused and were civil …

Rajan Kumar @ Ranjan Lal DevversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Rajan Kumar and Sonu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 12.6 litres of liquor from an orchard. They argued they had no conscious possession, were not owners of the …

Binod RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Ram, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.72 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a third party, Suraj, …

Manti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manti Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 150 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, feared arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was unaware of her friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle, and that mere …

Manoj ChaupalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Chaupal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 720 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, with charges under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …

Dinkar kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinkar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 6.84 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …

Suresh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No. 346 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including forgery, intimidation and criminal conspiracy. The FIR alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused forged land documents, …

Chhotu Yadav @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chhotu Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was recovered from a place not belonging to him, and the only evidence is a …

Guddu Mishra @ Aditya Chandra MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Mishra sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25.76 litres of liquor from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession of the liquor. He argued that the …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, …

Siya Devi and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISPOSED

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Siya Devi, claimed ownership of a parcel of land recorded as Gairmajarua (non-cultivable) and sought to quash several orders that cancelled its mutation, alleging the land was a pond (Pokhar) used by villagers. The State of Bihar and land officials contended …

Jaspreet SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jaspreet Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 3,438 litres of liquor were seized, was charged under several IPC provisions (188, 420, 467, 468, 471/34) and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (30(a), 32(i)(ii), 41). He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that he was …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a public place. She argued that the liquor was not found in her possession, the FIR did not name her, and she had only two …

Mukesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Sahni sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that liquor was recovered from his straw house in violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his immediate possession, and that the straw …

Rakesh Kumar DevversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Dev, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for the alleged recovery of 114.9 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …

Vinod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vinod Yadav and Badhu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued they had no possession of the liquor, were not the owners of the vehicle, and were implicated solely …