Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jitendra Paswan @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and specified conditions.

Summary

Jitendra Paswan was arrested on 15 October 2025 in connection with PS case No. 309 of 2025, arising from an FIR dated 14 October 2025 that alleged his involvement in offences punishable under Sections 317(5) and 318(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution claimed that a stolen motorcycle was recovered from the accused and that a charge‑sheet had been filed. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, that the seizure of the motorcycle did not comply with Section 103 of the same Act, and that only police personnel were listed as seizure witnesses, suggesting false implication. The State opposed bail, citing a prior criminal antecedent of the petitioner. The court, after considering the charge‑sheet, the period of custody and the alleged antecedent, granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering of evidence and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case where a charge‑sheet has been filed under Sections 317(5) and 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
  • Whether alleged non‑compliance with Section 103 of the B.N.S., 2023 regarding seizure procedures affects the bail decision.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent justifies denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • charge‑sheet
  • Section 103
  • criminal antecedent
  • motorcycle theft
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1879 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2025 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
                 Jitendra Paswan @ Jitendra Kumar Son of Sitaram Paswan Village
                 -Madarichak, P.s -Jairampur, District -Sheikhpura,

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                   Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   15.10.2025 in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 309 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 14.10.2025 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 317(5), 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. According to prosecution case, a stolen motorcycle

                   in question was recovered from the possession of the accused-

                   petitioner.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and the petitioner has not committed any

                   offence as in the F.I.R. Learned counsel further submits that it

                   appears from seizure list there is non-compliance of section 103
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1879 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/3




          BNSS and only Police personnel is the seizure witness which

          suggest that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present

          case. He further submits that the police after investigation,

          submitted charge-sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner

          is in custody since 15.10.2025.

                       5. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries

          one criminal antecedent other than the present one.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          and the fact that chargesheet has been submitted against the

          petitioner and the period of custody, let the petitioner, above

          named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

          Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 309 of

          2025, with the following conditions:

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1879 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                      for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ranjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.