Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Yogendra RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Yogendra Ravidas was arrested on 16‑02‑2026 in connection with PS Tankuppa case No. 152 of 2025 for alleged assault, charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He filed a regular bail application, asserting that he is innocent and has only one prior criminal antecedent. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the seriousness of the offences. After hearing counsel for both sides, the Patna High Court allowed the bail application, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The court clarified that its order is confined to bail and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 126(2), 118(1) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • high court
  • pre‑trial detention
  • sureties

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25926 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2025 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Yogendra Ravidas Son of Sitaram Ravidas R/o Village - Manak Diha, P.S. -
                 Tankuppa, District - Gayaji.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Ms.Renu Kumari, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr.Pushpa Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 152 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2),

                   126(2), 118(1) AND 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is an

                   accused of assaulting the victim.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. The petitioner is in custody since 16.02.2026 having one

                   criminal antecedent.

                                 5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

                   prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25926 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  6. Considering the nature of                allegation, this

                     application is allowed.

                                  7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail

                     on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gayaji/ concerned Court in

                     connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No.152 of 2025.

                                  8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.