Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satyam DasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Regular bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Satyam Das was arrested in connection with a case alleging that 379.980 litres of foreign liquor were recovered from an orchard, and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. The petitioner contended that no liquor was found in his possession, that he was implicated solely on the basis of a local chowkidar's statement, and that he had been in custody since 18 May 2026. The State opposed his request for regular bail. The court noted that a co‑accused, Santosh Mandal, had been granted anticipatory bail in a similar matter and, considering the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner, decided to grant regular bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. The order released the petitioner on regular bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 despite the allegations.
  • Whether the evidence, primarily a chowkidar's statement, is sufficient to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • foreign liquor
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44373 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2026 Thana- MANIGACHI District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Satyam Das, aged about 32 years, Son of Ram Sewak Das, Resident of
                 Village and P.O. - Putai Patai, P.S.- Manigachhi, District- Darbhanga, Bihar.
                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Jyoti Prakash, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP
              ======================================================
             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                    ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 82 of 2026 instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act, 2022.

                                3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 379.980 litres of

                   foreign liquor has been recovered from an orchard.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has

                   falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of

                   suspicion. He submits that no incriminating articles have been

                   recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner or

                   from his house. He further submits that the petitioner has been

                   made accused only on the basis of the statement of local
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44373 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                            2/3




          Chowkidar. Petitioner was not arrested at the spot and there is

          no independent witness of the seizure list. Petitioner is in

          custody since 18.05.2026.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. From perusal of the FIR, seizure list and impugned

          order of the learned I/C Exclusive Special Judge-II (Excise Act),

          Darbhanga dated 26.05.2026, it appears that petitioner is named

          in the FIR and his name surfaced in this case on the basis of the

          statement of local Chowkidar. From perusal of the records, it

          appears that on the basis of written report of the informant, FIR

          has been registered under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar

          Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 and the allegation is of total

          379.980 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered from an

          orchard. Similarly situated co-accused person namely Santosh

          Mandal has been granted provisional anticipatory bail by a

          Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 37514 of 2026 vide order

          dated 17.06.2026, so considering all these aspects of the case

          and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, I am

          inclined to grant regular bail to the above named petitioner.

                       7. Accordingly the prayer for regular bail of the

          petitioner is allowed.          Let     the petitioner above named be
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44373 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

                      (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge-II, (Excise

                      Act), Darbhanga in connection with Manigachhi (Darbhanga)

                      P.S. Case No. 82 of 2026.


                                                                 (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Anand Kr.

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.