Patna High Court
Hira Kumar @ Hira PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Bail was denied to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Hira Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 458 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 395, 412 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, relating to dacoity, robbery and criminal conspiracy. This was his second attempt to obtain bail after the trial had already commenced. The court examined the allegations, the material gathered during investigation, and the fact that the trial was underway. Considering the seriousness of the offences and the stage of the proceedings, the court was not inclined to enlarge bail. Consequently, the petitioner's prayer for bail was rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 395, 412 and 120(B) of the IPC after the trial has commenced.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 120(B), 395, 412
Subjects
- bail
- Indian Penal Code
- Section 395
- Section 412
- Section 120(B)
- dacoity
- robbery
- criminal conspiracy
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59859 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-458 Year-2021 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali
======================================================
Hira Kumar @ Hira Paswan son of Ram Raji Paswan Resident of Ward No-
9,sahdullahapur ,P.s- sakra, District-Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jay Prakash Sharma
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 24-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hajipur
Town P. S. Case No. 458 of 2021 registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 395, 412 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal
Code.
3. This is the second attempt of the petitioner to seek bail.
4. In the nature of allegation as alleged and the material
which transpired during the course of investigation and the fact that
the trial has commenced, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the
petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is
rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.