Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shiv shankar SahuversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Shiv Shankar Sahu, an 18‑year‑old student, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault, pouring hot oil, and theft under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes. He claimed a clean antecedent and that the incident was accidental, arising from a dispute at his mother’s tea stall. The State opposed the bail. The court considered his youth, first‑offence status, and student background, and noted that custodial detention could jeopardise his future. Relying on Section 482(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes, the court directed that he be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The anticipatory bail application was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the alleged offences
  • Whether the petitioner’s age, clean antecedent and student status justify the grant of bail
  • Whether the nature of the offences under Sections 125(2), 115(2), 117(3), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. preclude anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 115(2), 117(3), 125(2), 303(2), 3(5)
  • B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • theft
  • minor
  • student
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85704 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHNAUR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Shiv shankar Sahu son of Chhote Lal Sahu Resident of Village- Tamuriya, ps-
                 Lakhnaur, Dist- Madhubani

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Hriday Narayan Harshit
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

                   arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 125(2), 115(2), 117(3), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young

                   boy aged about 18 years and the informant alleges that his son

                   on 25.03.205 went to the shop of Asha Devi when accused

                   persons assaulted him and petitioner poured hot oil over him

                   and snatched Rs.1,200/-.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

                   informant. It is next submitted that no doubt, the son of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85704 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/3




          informant got burnt by hot oil, but then, the occurrence was not

          committed in the manner it is being portrayed in the instant FIR.

          It is further submitted that petitioner is son of Asha Devi as

          Asha Devi runs a tea stall where the victim had come and had

          opened a bottle for drinking which was objected by his mother

          and sister, on which the victim started having an altercation

          when petitioner intervened. It is submitted that the altercation

          led to a fight in between the petitioner and the victim and

          accidentally the hot oil which was kept at the shop fell on the

          victim leading to burn injury. It is next submitted that no doubt,

          the occurrence has taken place, but then, petitioner is a young

          boy aged about 18 years and if he is sent to judicial custody, his

          entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that

          he may come in contact with hardened criminals. It is also

          asserted and submitted relying on the Annexure-4 to the

          anticipatory bail application that petitioner is a student.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. Considering the submissions and taking into

          consideration the fact that petitioner is a young boy aged about

          18 years and is a student and it is his first offence, the petitioner,

          above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85704 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                         learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to

                         be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of

                         Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

                         like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court

                         where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with

                         Lakhnaur P. S. Case No.25 of 2025, subject to the conditions

                         laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.


                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.