Patna High Court

Yugal Kishore Shikariya@ Jugal Kishor SikariaversusChadradeo Prasad Singh

Decided: 20 January 2026
Disposal: DISMISSED
Bench: S B P SINGH

Holding

The suit is not maintainable as the petitioner failed to produce any supporting documents.

Summary

The petitioner, Yugal Kishore Shikariya, filed a suit against Chadradeo Prasad Singh and Yogendra Prasad. The petitioner’s counsel could not produce any document that could form the basis of the suit. The trial court therefore held that the suit was not maintainable. On the application filed thereafter, the court found it to be without merit. Consequently, the application was dismissed. No other substantive issues were addressed.

Issues considered

Is the suit maintainable when the petitioner fails to produce any supporting documentary evidence?

Subjects

maintainability
civil suit
lack of documentary evidence
dismissal

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1084 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Yugal Kishore Shikariya@ Jugal Kishor Sikaria S/o Late Radha Krishna
                 Shikariya @ Radha Krishan Sikaria Resident of Sakin- Koiriya Tola, Triloki
                 Nagar, P.S.-Raxaul, District- East Champaran.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
            1.   Chadradeo Prasad Singh S/o Late Harihar Mahto Resident of Sakin- Koiriya
                 Tola, Triloki Nagar, P.S.-Raxaul, District- East Champaran.
            2.   Yogendra Prasad, S/o Late Harihar Mahto Resident of Sakin- Koiriya Tola,
                 Triloki Nagar, P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Samir Kumar
                 For the Respondent/s   :       Mr.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-01-2026                 Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to show

                   any document which may be the basis of the suit. Hence,

                   learned Trial Court has rightly held that the suit is not

                   maintainable.

                               2. Accordingly, the instant application is devoid of

                   merit and the same stands dismissed.



                                            (S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
Ankit Kumar/-

U

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…