Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
142 judgments · newest first · showing 1–142
The petitioner, Md Sajid, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 66132 of 2025) arising from a police case registered in 2023 in West Champaran. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing. The State of Bihar and the informant were represented by an Additional …
Lalan Yadav filed a civil miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, and even on the final date he sought a further adjournment. The court observed that the petitioner appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the case. The issue before the court was …
The petitioner, Saurabh Dutt Pandey, filed an application in the Patna High Court against his wife, Arti Kumari Devi. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner to argue the application. The court noted the absence of any representation for the petitioner. Consequently, the court …
The petitioner, Satyendra Ram, filed a bail application in the Patna High Court in connection with a criminal miscellaneous case arising from PS Jagdishpur. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The court considered the request and, after …
Munna Mustak was arrested in a complaint alleging dowry harassment, assault and related offences under IPC sections 498S, 448, 323, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed the allegations were false, asserted his willingness to maintain his wife at Rs.2,000 per month, and offered to file an …
The petitioners, representing the estate of the late Urmila Sinha, filed Test Case No. 2 of 2023 concerning the goods and probate matters of the deceased. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, sought the court's permission to withdraw the test case. The court considered whether …
The petition filed by the estate of the late Yugal Kishore Prasad Sinha sought relief in the High Court of Patna. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the respondent was represented only by a Mr. (name not specified). The court noted that the petitioner's counsel had failed to appear …
The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application after a charge sheet was filed against other accused persons and the investigation against him was ordered closed by the SP, Vaishali. The State argued that the application was not maintainable, citing the impugned order which …
The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged assault on his mother, Phula Devi, and other offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable and Securitisation Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in a family dispute …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested in Bhagalpur and had filed an anticipatory bail application. After his arrest, his counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application, arguing that it had become infructuous. The court considered whether a bail application could be …
The petitioners, Sheikh Saheb and Safi Ahmad, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including unlawful assembly and assault. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in a …
Rakhi Gupta applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a land dispute case (Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 1147 of 2024) where the informant alleged that a sale deed was fraudulently registered in her favour and that she was involved in criminal intimidation and forgery. The petitioner …
Vijay Kumar filed a civil miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court, which has been pending for about seven years. The court observed that the petitioner failed to appear or address the matter on four to five scheduled dates, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the case. Given the …
Petitioner Rocky Singh filed an application seeking restoration of Civil Miscellaneous No. 267 of 2018, which had been dismissed on 19 September 2025 for failure to comply with an order dated 12 July 2022. The petitioner supported the application with an affidavit. The learned counsel for the …
The petitioner, Girja Devi, filed an application before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petitioner herself was absent. The respondents were represented by senior counsel Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha and other advocates. The court noted the absence of the …
Manish Kumar filed an application seeking modification of a bail order dated 15.01.2026 which required his release only after the framing of charge. The petitioner argued that due to lapses by the prosecution, no sanction report was filed and no charge had been framed, while co-accused in similar …
The petitioner, Ankit Raj Rathore, was granted anticipatory bail on 16 July 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40450 of 2025. The bail order required the petitioner to furnish bail bonds within a stipulated period, which he could not meet due to unavoidable circumstances. The petitioner filed a …
The petitioner, Godawari Devi, filed two criminal miscellaneous applications and later sought permission to withdraw both, stating they had become infructuous. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the applications. Consequently, the applications were dismissed as …
The High Court heard two bail applications arising from the same murder case (PS Case No. 107 of 2025) where the accused were charged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Sunita Devi, motivated by a marriage proposal involving her daughter, conspired …
Suraj Kumar, the petitioner, was charged under multiple sections of the BNS and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping his 10‑year‑old grand‑daughter. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and alleging political motives behind the delayed FIR. The State and the informant’s …
The petitioners, a large group of heirs, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to set aside the order dated 31‑10‑2018 of the Munsif, Saran, which had rejected their prayer to call the original records of Rent Suit No. 22/105/1920 from the Chapra collectorate. The petitioners, who are …
The petitioners filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking the High Court’s intervention to compel the District Judge, Nawada, to dispose of Title Appeal No. 09 of 2018, which remains pending despite a decree in the original Title Suit No. 167 of 2005. The petitioners argued that the district …
The petitioners filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief against a large group of respondents. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled hearing date. The court observed that the petitioners had not pressed the application. Consequently, …
The petitioners, a group of Yadav family members, filed an amendment petition in a suit (P.S. Case No.09 of 2005) after both parties had closed their evidence. The Sub Judge dismissed the amendment, holding that it was filed at a belated stage. The petitioners appealed, arguing that the amendment …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Gupta, was charged under Sections 364, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder and concealment of his informant’s sister. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, voluntary surrender, and a clean antecedent, and pointed out that a …
Ravi Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 306 of the IPC alleging that he sent obscene photographs to his informant's daughter and threatened her with a firearm, actions that allegedly led to the victim's suicide. The petitioner contended that the allegations were fabricated, …
Vijay Kumar filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking restoration of Civil Miscellaneous No. 655 of 2018, which had been dismissed on 12‑12‑2025 for want of prosecution. The petition argued that the dismissal was premature and that the parties were ready to pursue the matter. The …
The petitioner, Saryug Sah, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking restoration of Civil Miscellaneous No. 754 of 2022, which had been dismissed on 02‑02‑2026 for want of prosecution. The respondents, a group of heirs and relatives, opposed the restoration. The court examined the …
The petitioner, Gobardhan Chauhan, had been granted anticipatory bail on 13-02-2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.63149 of 2024. He failed to furnish the required bail bonds within the time prescribed due to unavoidable circumstances. The petitioner sought a further extension of time to submit the …
The petitioners, Kalpana Devi and relatives, were granted anticipatory bail on 15 November 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 69626 of 2025. They were required to furnish bail bonds within a stipulated period but were unable to do so due to unavoidable circumstances. The petitioners filed an …
The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar Yadav, was charged with offences under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354A, 354B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 66E, 67 of the IT Act for allegedly intercepting a woman, forcibly disrobing her, assaulting her with a pistol butt, taking nude photographs and threatening her. An …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Chaudhary, filed a civil miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner subsequently sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The issue before the Court was whether it could grant such permission to withdraw a pending civil …
The petitioners, Gita Sinha (widow) and her sons, filed an application before the Patna High Court against the respondents, a group of relatives. The matter had been adjourned eleven times. No further prosecution of the application was undertaken. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application …
The petitioner, Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, filed an application against several respondents including Jharkhande Tiwari and others. The case was listed before the Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. B. Pd. Singh and was adjourned twelve times. On 16-03-2026, no party appeared before the court. The court noted the …
Ram Prakash Sinha filed a petition in the Patna High Court against Manorma Devi. The petition was scheduled for hearing but no party appeared before the court. The matter experienced nine adjournments without any progress. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the suit. Consequently, the …
The petitioners, members of the Santhaliya family, filed an application against the respondents, also members of the Santhaliya family, in the Patna High Court. The matter was listed repeatedly, resulting in nineteen adjournments. No party appeared before the court on the date of hearing. The court …
The petitioners, plaintiffs in title suit No. 848 of 2015, discovered a typographical error in the suit schedule where plot number 7448 was incorrectly recorded as 7478. They filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC on 2 June 2018 to correct the error, which was rejected by the …
The petitioners filed a civil miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners at the hearing on 30-09-2024, and the record showed they had also failed to appear on the last date of hearing. The court observed that the petitioners appeared to have …
The petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to quash the order dated 31.07.2024 that rejected his request for a stay of further proceedings in Title Appeal No. 229 of 2006. The petition arose from a Title Partition Suit No. 135 of 1993, which was decreed ex‑parte against the …
Ashok Kumar filed an application in the Patna High Court as a Civil Miscellaneous case against Dharmendra Kumar, Usha Devi and Abhay Kumar Gupta. The petitioner's counsel argued that the filing was inadvertent and that the matter should be treated as a Miscellaneous Appeal. The court examined the …
Petitioner Krishna Jee Sharma sought bail in a case (P.S. Case No. 229 of 2021) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly obtaining a loan from Bihar Awami Co-operative Bank using forged documents. The petitioner contended that the documents …
The petitioner, Hardeo Tiwari, filed a title suit (No. 376 of 2024) seeking declaration of his right over land and to declare a sale deed as forged. After the suit was filed, the defendants did not appear, and the petitioner sought to amend the plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil …
Guddu Singh, the winning candidate in Election Petition No. 23 of 2021, filed an application to quash the order dated 06‑06‑2025 of the Munsif Sadar Motihari which rejected his request to reopen and adduce further evidence. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2021 and that he …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Town P.S. Case No. 935 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a land‑sale dispute. The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to sell land belonging to Anil Kumar …
The petitioner, Cintu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 97 of 2025) involving multiple serious offences under the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that a group of accused assaulted the informant and her husband with intent to kill, and later trespassed and assaulted …
The petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous petition in the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the final hearing, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the case. The court observed that the petitioner had not prosecuted the petition despite being given …
Six individuals from Ghewrahi village applied for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in a case (PS No.218/2025) alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes for allegedly obstructing a public pathway and assaulting a neighbour. The prosecution’s informant claimed the …
Shabbir Akhtar sought protection from arrest in a monetary dispute case (Kotwali P.S. Case No. 219 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He claimed the allegations were false, stating that Rs 10,00,000 was …
Kishundeo Mandal was implicated in a case involving the recovery of 95.95 kg of ganja from the house of co-accused Kari Devi, his mother‑in‑law. The petitioner argued that no contraband was found in his conscious possession and that the police had not complied with mandatory provisions of the NDPS …
Manoj Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Aayar P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025) that alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s informant claimed that Singh’s household members assaulted him with iron rods and sticks after a dispute over a complaint …
The petitioners, three residents of Sirisiya Maath, were implicated in a 2012 forest‑related case alleging illegal felling of Sheesham, Jamun and Putrajiva trees and assault on forest officials during a seizure operation. They contend they were not present at the incident, no incriminating material …
The petitioner, Sona Devi, filed a civil miscellaneous application challenging an order dated 12‑11‑2024 that, upon allowing her withdrawal of Title Suit No. 110 of 2016, imposed costs of Rs 75,000 on each of three defendants and Rs 2,25,000 on the District Legal Services Authority, Madhubani. The …
The petitioners filed a civil miscellaneous petition seeking relief against the State of Bihar and other respondents. The court granted them a four‑week extension to rectify defects identified in the office report dated 13‑12‑2023. The petitioners failed to remove the defects within the stipulated …
The petitioner, Baijnath Sah, filed a petition seeking to set aside a District Judge's order that had held him to be a tenant of suit premises and stayed execution of a decree in Title Suit No. 138 of 1987. The lower court had arrived at this finding after dismissing the petitioner's earlier …
The petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to set aside a June 12, 2017 order of the District Judge, Madhepura, which had allowed the respondent's petition under Order XLI Rule 5 and stayed the execution proceedings. Both parties appeared before the Patna High Court, and counsel …
The petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to set aside the order of the Sub‑Judge that rejected his amendment to a title suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement. The amendment sought to implead the transferee, Asha Devi, and to declare the sale deed in her …
The petitioners filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to quash an order dated 08‑02‑2023 passed by the Sub‑Judge, II, Sherghati, which had deleted them as defendants in Title Suit No. 29 of 2018 under Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC. They claimed a valid gift deed in their favour, while the …
The petitioner sought to set aside a 2014 Family Court order that granted the respondent maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, directing Rs 10,000 per month and a Rs 25,000 lump‑sum cost. The petitioner failed to file a statement of assets and did not pay the ordered …
The petitioner sought to quash an order of Sub‑Judge‑XV dated 7‑May‑2017 which had rejected his petition to have the Survey‑Knowing Pleader Commissioner’s report taken as an exhibit after reopening evidence in Title Suit No. 406 of 2011. The petitioner argued that the commissioner had been appointed …
The petitioner filed a test case concerning the goods of the late Bindeshwsari. The court had earlier issued an order on 11 September 2025 requiring the petitioner’s counsel to take certain actions. Despite repeated calls, neither the petitioner nor the counsel appeared before the court. The court …
The petitioners, residents of Khushiyali village, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a land‑dispute related case (PS Case No. 92 of 2025) alleging assault and grievous hurt under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, forcibly …
Petitioner Harinath Mishra was implicated in a criminal case (Laheriyasarai PS Case No. 614 of 2023) for alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, accused of conspiring to defraud an informant of Rs. 20,00,000. He contended that he was innocent, explaining that he had sold land to a …
Petitioner Kamlawati Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a criminal case (Bhore P.S. Case No. 368 of 2022) involving alleged forgery, property fraud, and offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that she, along with …
The petitioners, four residents of Balha village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Keoti PS Case No. 220 of 2025) that alleged offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners brutally assaulted the informant's sons and attempted …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a police case alleging that he assaulted an informant with an iron rod, causing head and hand injuries. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and asserting that the prosecution story was fabricated and retaliatory to a separate case …
The petitioners, a group of villagers from Mithauli, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Rahika P.S. Case No. 161 of 2025) alleging offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in a mob assault on the informant's …
Lakshman Singh and Bisheshwar Singh petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS No. 80 of 2025) alleging multiple offences under the B.N.S., including assault, robbery, and outraging modesty. The prosecution’s case is based on an …
The petitioners, Sindhu Devi and Krishna Vati Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (PS Case No. 53 of 2025) under Section 305 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that a bag containing gold and silver was stolen from the complainant's house on 4 April 2025. The petitioners …
The petitioner, Chandan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Rampur P.S. Case No.506/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted an informant and later …
Petitioner Raj Kishor was arrested in connection with a violent incident on the Melwa–Madhubani road where a group allegedly destroyed a newly constructed road and assaulted an informant. The prosecution alleged that Raj Kishor snatched the informant's gold chain, while other co‑accused committed …
Vikram Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging that he forcibly abducted a minor girl, Ritika Kumari, on 31 December 2025. The prosecution’s informant claimed the abduction, while the petitioner asserted his innocence, stating that the …
The petitioner Kanhaiya Lal Keshri challenged an order dated 11‑07‑2025 that directed him to deposit Rs 10,000 per month as arrears of rent and future rent under Section 15 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act. The eviction suit was filed by the respondent after purchasing the …
The petitioners, a group of individuals named Ganesh Pandit, Mahesh Pandit, Rameshwar Pandit, Rajeshwar Pandit and Banarshi Devi, filed a civil miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf at any of the hearings, including the final date of hearing. The …
The petitioners filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to set aside a 16‑December‑2022 order of the Sub‑Judge VI, Patna City, which had allowed an intervenor to be impleaded as a defendant in Title Suit No. 67 of 1995. The intervenor claimed ownership of the suit property based on a …
The petitioner, Uday Shankar Prasad, filed an application before the Patna High Court against three respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and no further prosecution of the application was undertaken. The court noted the absence of any representation or steps to advance the …
The petitioners filed a civil miscellaneous application challenging the order of the Civil Judge Junior Division‑II, Vaishali, which had rejected their request to mark a diary and a bank account statement as exhibits in Eviction Suit No. 03 of 2018. The eviction suit, filed by the respondent for …
The petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous application challenging the Civil Judge's order that rejected his petitions to delete the names of certain defendants from the plaint in Title Suit No. 291 of 1996. The petitioner argued that the defendants had not filed any written statement or produced …
The petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous application challenging an order that allowed the defendant to amend his written statement under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC in an eviction suit. The petitioner argued that the amendment admitted tenancy but contested the plaintiff's claim of absolute …
The petitioner, Kunal Ravi Singh, filed a civil‑miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash the order dated 14 September 2018 of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhagalpur, which had rejected his petition under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for being …
The petitioner, Md. Naushad Ahmad, filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar and several respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the present application and to file a fresh application before the …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking the expeditious disposal of Execution Case No. 01 of 2022, in which a judgment and decree were passed on 2 August 2021 and 13 August 2021 respectively. The petitioner requested that the execution court be directed to take …
The petitioner, Krishna Rai, was arrested after police seized two pistols and a country-made pistol from his residence, alleging violation of Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He claimed innocence, argued that the firearms were not in his conscious possession, and contended that the search …
The petitioners, three women from Bhith village, were arrested after allegedly assaulting police officers and helping a male accused escape during a liquor‑smuggling raid on 24‑10‑2025. They were charged under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for offences …
The petitioner, Ankit Dhangar, sought regular bail in a case (Paharpur PS Case No. 292 of 2025) involving alleged murder by throttling, with charges under sections 80, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The FIR described a telephonic tip about the death of the deceased’s daughter, leading to the discovery …
Ashish Thakur was arrested in connection with a case under sections 310(4), 310(5) of the BNS and sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after police recovered arms from a co‑accused and a mobile phone from the petitioner. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no TIP …
The petitioner, Neha Kumari, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Govindganj P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025) where the accused allegedly lured an informant and his friends, seized cash, a gold chain and a mobile phone. The prosecution alleged that the robbery was carried out by Chandan Singh …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, filed a petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and other respondents seeking relief. The petition was filed without attaching a copy of the judgment and decree on which the relief was sought. The court examined the record and noted the absence of …
Petitioner Vijay Ram was apprehended of arrest in a complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 120(B), 406, 467 and 468 relating to a land sale dispute. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner received part of the consideration for a sale deed but failed to pay the balance or execute a …
The petitioner filed a test case seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Manish Kishore and Mr. Bal Bhushan Choudhary, requested the court’s leave to withdraw. The Hon’ble Justice S. B. Pd. Singh granted the permission. Consequently, the case (Test Case No. 14 of …
The petitioner, Ful Mohammad Miyan, was arrested in connection with a murder case involving the killing of an informant's younger brother, charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, there was no direct …
Kundan Yadav was arrested on 2 July 2025 after police intercepted a motorcycle and recovered a pistol and a mobile phone from his possession. He was charged under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, claiming the prosecution’s version was fabricated, and …
Ramdeo Das and Dipak Kumar were arrested in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 260 of 2025 for allegedly distributing pamphlets demanding money and possessing an illegal firearm, offences punishable under several sections of the BNS, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the Arms Act. The …
The petitioner, Amar Deep Sharma, was arrested in connection with a NDND‑PS case alleging possession of 220 bottles of Onerex cough syrup containing codeine. He contended that the syrup is exempt under Notification S.O. 826(E) 1985 because its codeine concentration (0.2%) is below the 2.5% threshold …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 96 of the BNS for alleged kidnapping of a minor with intent to marry her. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, in collusion with an associate, abducted the minor daughter of Sarita Devi. The petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Yadav, applied for regular bail under Section 96 of the BNS in a case alleging kidnapping of a 15‑year‑old girl. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner enticed and abducted the minor, while the petitioner claimed the relationship was consensual and the girl …
Manoj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging criminal intimidation, forgery, and the creation and distribution of obscene material under Sections 506, 469 of the IPC and Sections 67, 67A of the IT Act. The complainant claimed the accused threatened his family, blackmailed his …
The petitioners, Rakesh Kumar Pandey and his minor children, filed an application before the Patna High Court against members of the Tiwary family. The petitioner's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application and to be allowed to institute a fresh suit in the …
The petitioner, Yugal Kishore Shikariya, filed a suit against Chadradeo Prasad Singh and Yogendra Prasad. The petitioner’s counsel could not produce any document that could form the basis of the suit. The trial court therefore held that the suit was not maintainable. On the application filed …
Karuna Devi, wife of Dilip Kumar Singh, filed an application before the Patna High Court in Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No.1406 of 2025. The petitioner sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the pending application and to be granted liberty to file an appeal before the appropriate court. The …
Petitioner Sangeeta Rai filed a Civil Miscellaneous application (C. Misc. No.24 of 2026) challenging an order dated 15-11-2025 passed by Sub Judge V, Samastipur in Title Suit No. 243 of 2021. The High Court examined whether a C. Misc. proceeding was the correct procedural route for seeking relief …
The petitioners filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to have the judgment and decree of a 1974 partition suit, along with the compromise petition, marked as exhibits in their pending Title Suit No. 87 of 1985. The trial court had earlier rejected this request on 07.08.2025. The …
The petitioner, Lila Devi, filed Civil Miscellaneous No. 1324 of 2025 seeking reliefs that are essentially writ remedies. The respondent parties include Jitendra Singh and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the matter should be treated as a Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case (CWJC). The Court …
The petitioner, Anil Baitha, was implicated in a 2013 case involving alleged possession of illegal arms and alleged links to a banned Maoist/Naxalite organization, based primarily on the confessional statement of co-accused Lakhindra Paswan. No weapons or incriminating articles were recovered from …
The petitioner, Prakash Jha, was arrested on allegations that he threatened to shoot the informant's son with a country‑made pistol and was subsequently handed over to police. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and had no incriminating material recovered from his …
The petitioner, Dharamraj Kumar, was arrested after police recovered a loaded country-made pistol from his waist during an orchestra program, leading to charges under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, contending that the search and seizure violated the mandatory …
The petitioner, Abhisek Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the BNS concerning alleged robbery of cash and clothing. The prosecution’s case is based primarily on a confessional statement of a co-accused, which the petitioner’s counsel argued lacks evidentiary …
The petitioner, Govind Mandal, was arrested in connection with a case involving a black flag and related materials seized from a public field, and was charged under Sections 308(3), 308(4), 308(5), 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 16, 17, 18, 20 and 21 of the Unlawful …
The petitioner, Hifazat Karim, was arrested along with eight others in a Patna police case involving offences under Sections 303(2), 317(5) and 112(2) of the BNS. He claims he was falsely implicated while waiting for a delayed train and asserts his innocence, clean antecedents and poverty. The State …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery of Rs. 90,000 and valuables from an Ecom Express office, alleged under Section 392 of the IPC. The prosecution’s case is based on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, and the petitioner was never subjected to a test …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was arrested on 10 October 2025 after police recovered 100 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a scooty and seized the vehicle. He claims he is not the owner of the scooty and was falsely implicated due to personal enmity. The petitioner applied for regular bail …
The petitioner, Jitendra Bhagat, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after police recovered 99 live 8 mm cartridges and mobile phones from a vehicle he was driving. He claims innocence, arguing that the evidence against him rests …
The petitioner, Narendra Kumar Sah, applied for regular bail in a case under the NDPS Act where 57.88 kg of narcotics were seized from a vehicle allegedly driven by him. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, which the petitioner’s counsel argued has no …
The petitioner, Navin Kumar, applied for regular bail in a cyber‑related case (Cyber P.S. No.165 of 2025) involving multiple serious offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that during a raid on 21‑Oct‑2025, the petitioner’s …
Anjani Sah was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act after police recovered 6.8 kg of ganja from co‑accused Lalan Prasad Yadav. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and that no narcotic substance was found on …
The petitioners filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to quash an order dated 2 November 2017 passed by the Additional Munsif in Title Suit No. 45 of 2009, alleging that the order was illegal, arbitrary and beyond the court’s jurisdiction. The impugned order had allowed the plaintiff to …
Petitioner Raju Paswan faced arrest in a complaint alleging he obtained a Rs.90,000 loan for his wife's treatment in 2015 and later defaulted, invoking sections 406, 420, 341, 323 and 504 IPC. He contested the allegation, presenting a marriage invitation card showing he married in 2023, thereby …
The petitioner, Pushpa Devi, filed a civil miscellaneous application (No.1654 of 2025) seeking a court direction for the speedy disposal of Miscellaneous Case No.13 of 2018, which was filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC to set aside an ex‑parte order dated 24‑12‑2016 in Title Suit No.457 of …
The petitioner, Smt. Janki Devi, sought to set aside a Sub‑Judge’s order dismissing a miscellaneous application filed to restore Money Suit No. 03 of 2011, which had been dismissed for default because the plaintiff failed to file the required format of publication for substituted service. The …
The petitioner, Satya Nand Sharma, filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to quash an order dated 23 May 2017 that allowed the respondents to amend their written statement by deleting the phrase "at present tenant of the plaintiff". The petitioner argued that the original verification …
The petitioner, Saidullah, filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to withdraw his earlier petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition before the trial court. The petitioner argued that withdrawal was necessary and requested the court's permission for a fresh filing. The court …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar Singh, filed a civil miscellaneous application against his wife, Anjali Singh. The matter was heard on 8 January 2026. The court, referring to a Full Bench decision in Dr. Dilip Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2024), ordered that the civil application be converted into a …
The petitioner, Raj Kishore Kumar, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to withdraw the pending application and to obtain a direction for the trial court to dispose of Miscellaneous Case No. 59 of 2025 expeditiously. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission for withdrawal and a …
The petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to set aside an order dated 7 June 2017 that had expunged the testimony of two witnesses, Raj Kumar Jaishwal and Sanjay Kumar, in a probate suit (Suit No. 10 of 2006, arising from probate case No. 46 of 1993). The order was based on the …
The petitioner sought to implead twelve subsequent purchasers of the suit property in Title Suit No. 625 of 2019, invoking Order I Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, after the defendant had alienated part of the property during the suit. The trial court rejected the …
The petitioners, who were defendants in Title Suit No. 23 of 1981, challenged an order dated 18.03.2025 that set aside the report of a Survey‑knowing Pleader Commissioner concerning several land plots and directed the appointment of a fresh commissioner. They argued that they had never previously …
The petitioners Sunita Devi and Panchalel Gupta filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking to set aside the Sub‑Judge's order dated 07‑07‑2025 which allowed the respondents to amend their plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The petitioners argued that the amendment was permitted without …
Veromika Tracon Pvt. Ltd., represented by its director, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief because a partition suit (No. 112 of 2021) was proceeding ex parte against it, having been impleaded as defendant No. 11. The petitioner argued that the appropriate forum for …
Petitioner Bechu Paswan filed a civil miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court seeking a direction for the speedy disposal of Title Suit No. 327 of 2016, which had been pending since 2016. The petitioner argued that the trial had commenced and evidence was led, but the suit remained …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(2), 338, 336(3) and 347(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). He is alleged to have fraudulently sold a motorcycle to the informant’s husband by claiming ownership, …
Radhey Shayam Singh and Sunil Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a fraud case (PS Case No. 426 of 2024) involving alleged production of fake documents, forged signatures on a non‑judicial stamp and a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, who are agnates …
The petitioner, Chandan Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a fraud case concerning the tampering of a photograph of a fake vendor, Sumit Kumar, in a sale deed registered on 19.07.2024. The prosecution alleges that Yadav, along with four others, colluded to substitute the …
The petitioner filed a civil miscellaneous application seeking a direction for the early disposal of Eviction Suit No. 07 of 2007, which was pending before the Munsif‑III Court, Bhojpur. The petitioner argued that the evidence had been closed, the case was long fixed for argument, and the respondent …
The petitioners, relatives of the husband of the complainant, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged physical assault and torture for non‑payment of a Rs.2 lakh …
Gurmit Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered in 2018 for alleged cheating in a 10+2 examination, allegedly involving the exchange of answer keys via WhatsApp. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a conspiracy to cheat, invoking sections 420 and 120(b) …
Ayush Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging fraud, forgery and intimidation under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he produced false documents to induce the informant, Deepak Kumar, to pay Rs. 18,48,180 and later …
The petitioner, Mayank Sarraf Lucky, was implicated in a fraud case involving Rs.10.65 lakh where duplicate gold jewellery were allegedly sold and cheques issued were dishonoured. He was charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 138 of the …
The petitioner, Md. Kaith, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging outraging the modesty of an informant's daughter and other offences under various sections of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, asserting that the money‑transaction allegations pertained to co‑accused and were civil …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No. 346 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including forgery, intimidation and criminal conspiracy. The FIR alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused forged land documents, …
Krishna Kumar Yadav was implicated in a fraud case alleging a loss of Rs. 11,11,447, with charges under IPC sections 420, 406 and 506/34. The petitioner contended that he was in Malaysia at the time, that no money was credited to his account, and that the informant had falsely implicated him. He …
The petitioner, Gyanendra Mishra, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking quashing of the Excise Commissioner’s order that confiscated his Maruti Suzuki Brezza and directing the release of the vehicle. He alleged that the confiscation order was passed without proper consideration of …
The petitioners, Ram Chandra Rai and others, filed a civil miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf at any stage, including the final hearing date. The court observed that the petitioners appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the case. …
Petitioner Prasad Sahani instituted a criminal miscellaneous proceeding against the State of Bihar and Sudhir Kumar Sah. An application related to the case was earlier dismissed on 3 December 2024 for non‑prosecution. On 4 March 2025, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, indicating a …
