Patna High Court
Vijay KumarversusSunaina Devi
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- S B P SINGH
Holding
The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to restore the dismissed civil miscellaneous case to its original file.
Summary
Vijay Kumar filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking restoration of Civil Miscellaneous No. 655 of 2018, which had been dismissed on 12‑12‑2025 for want of prosecution. The petition argued that the dismissal was premature and that the parties were ready to pursue the matter. The court examined whether a dismissed civil miscellaneous proceeding could be revived under its inherent powers. Relying on established principles that a court may restore a case when sufficient cause is shown, the judge found the petitioner's reasons satisfactory. Consequently, the court ordered the restoration of the original case file. The order was pronounced by Justice S. B. Pd. Singh on 18‑03‑2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil miscellaneous proceeding dismissed for want of prosecution can be restored upon application of the petitioner
Subjects
- restoration of suit
- want of prosecution
- civil miscellaneous jurisdiction
- inherent powers of court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.376 of 2026
In
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.655 of 2018
======================================================
Vijay Kumar Son of Late Brijnandan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Baghmali
Khata Jangi, P.S. Hajipur District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Sunaina Devi Wife of Late Devan Prasad Sinha, Residence of Mohalla
Bagmali (Khakajangi) P.S. Hajipur Town District- Vaishali.
2. Sunil Kumar, Residence of Mohalla Bagmali (Khakajangi) P.S. Hajipur
Town District- Vaishali.
3. Sanjay Kumar, Residence of Mohalla Bagmali (Khakajangi) P.S. Hajipur
Town District- Vaishali.
4. Arti Sinha Wife of Late Ranjit Kumar, Residence of Mohalla Bagmali
(Khakajangi) P.S. Hajipur Town District- Vaishali.
5. Ranbir Sinha, Son of Late Ranjit Kumar, Residence of Mohalla Bagmali
(Khakajangi) P.S. Hajipur Town District- Vaishali.
6. Rishu Sinha, Son of Late Ranjit Kumar, Residence of Mohalla Bagmali
(Khakajangi) P.S. Hajipur Town District- Vaishali.
7. Om Prishna Prasad Sinha, Son of Late Brijnandan Prasad, Resident of
Mohalla Bagmali Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
8. Basant Kumar Sinha, Son of Late Brijnandan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla
Bagmali Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
9. Smt. Alka Devi, D/o Late Brijnandan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Bagmali
Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
10. Mostt. Mira Devi, widow of Late Rajnandan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla
Bagmali Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
11. Gautam, Son of Late Rajnandan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Bagmali
Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
12. Godwari Devi @ Mamta Devi, widow of Late Raj Kishore Prasad, Resident
of Mohalla Bagmali Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
13. Manoj, Son of Raj Kishore, Resident of Mohalla Bagmali Khakajangi P.S.
Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
14. Madhukar Son of Raj Kishore Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Bagmali
Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
15. Rina daughter of Late Raj Kishore Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Bagmali
Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
16. Hina, daughter of Late Raj Kishore Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Bagmali
Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
17. Ina daughter of Late Raj Kishore Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Bagmali
Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
18. Birendra Prasad, Son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad, Resident of Mohalla
Patna High Court MJC No.376 of 2026(3) dt.18-03-2026
2/2
Bagmali Khakajangi P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratan Kumar Sinha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 18-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present application has been filed for
restoration of Civil Miscellaneous No. 655 of 2018, which got
dismissed on 12.12.2025 for want of prosecution.
3. For the reasons stated in this application, supported
by the affidavit the same is allowed and the connected case,
bearing Civil Miscellaneous No. 655 of 2018, is restored to its
original file.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
Ankit Kumar/-
U
Checking your session…