Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Krishna Rai @ Hare Krishna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Krishna Rai, was arrested after police seized two pistols and a country-made pistol from his residence, alleging violation of Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He claimed innocence, argued that the firearms were not in his conscious possession, and contended that the search and seizure were not conducted per proper procedure. The petitioner had been in judicial custody since 4 March 2025 and sought regular bail. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the facts, the duration of custody, and the nature of the offences, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail, subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and conditions of physical presence at trial and a family member as bailor.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a case under Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act.
  • Whether the police complied with the procedural requirements of search, seizure and investigation.
  • Whether the period of pre‑trial detention justifies the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • illegal arms
  • search and seizure
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3615 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Krishna Rai @ Hare Krishna Yadav Son of Dashrath Yadav R/o Village -
                 Bhushaula Danapur, Near Chowk Pokhar, P.S. - Phulwarisharif, Dist. - Patna.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Abhimanyu Deo
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mrs. Indu Kumari Srivastava
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case

                   No. 349 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 25(1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has

                   alleged that on 03.03.2025 at about 13:50 hours, during the

                   course of patrolling, he received a secret information that one

                   person was illegally selling illegal arms from his house. The

                   police reached a the place and apprehended a person who

                   disclosed his name as Krishna Rai (petitioner). From the

                   possession of the petitioner, two pistols and one country-made

                   pistol were recovered. On being asked to produce valid licence
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3615 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            2/3




          or documents of the seized firearms, he failed to do so and gave

          no satisfactory explanation. All the recovered firearms were

          duly seized on the spot by preparing a seizure list in the

          presence of witnesses, who voluntarily signed the same.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case. The alleged seized firearms were not recovered from the

          conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no

          concern with the articles recovered in the present case. Learned

          counsel also submits that no proper procedure of search and

          seizure has been followed by the police in this case. After

          completion of investigation chargesheet has been submitted by

          the police against the petitioner in the present case. Petitioner is

          languishing in judicial custody since 04.03.2025.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering

          the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds

          of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

          Judicial Magistrate, IV, Patna in connection with Phulwarisharif
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3615 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     P.S. Case No. 349 of 2025 subject to the following conditions :-

                                  (i). Petitioner will remain physically present in trial on

                     each and every date till the disposal of the case failing which, on

                     two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of

                     the petitioner may be cancelled by the Trial Court.

                                  (ii). One of the bailor shall be his family member.



                                                (S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
Ankit Kumar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.