Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajendra Prasad TiwariversusJharkhande Tiwari and Ors

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, filed an application against several respondents including Jharkhande Tiwari and others. The case was listed before the Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. B. Pd. Singh and was adjourned twelve times. On 16-03-2026, no party appeared before the court. The court noted the extensive adjournments and lack of prosecution. Consequently, the application was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • adjournment
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1558 of 2017
                  ======================================================
                  Rajendra Prasad Tiwari Son of Late Brikesh Tiwari, Resident of Village-
                  Shivpur, P.S. Kochas, P.O.- Kochas, District- Rohtas Sasaram.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
            1.    Jharkhande Tiwari
            2.    Sudarshan Tiwari,
            3.    Umesh Tiwari All are sons of Late Kesho Tiwari,
            4.    Kalawati Kunwar, Wife of Late Markandey Tiwari.
            5.    Amulya Tiwari,
            6.    Atulya Tiwari,
            7.    Achutya Tiwari, All Sons of Late Markandey Tiwari, All resident of Village-
                  Shivpur, P.S. and P.O.- Kochas, District- Rohtas Sasaram.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra
                  For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

10   16-03-2026                    None appears. Altogether twelve adjournments have

                    been taken in this case.

                                2 This application is dismissed for want of

                    prosecution.


                                             (S. B. Pd. Singh, J)

M.E.H./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.