Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anil Kumar SinhaversusSuresh Singh

Decided
Disposal
D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Holding

The petition is dismissed for default as the petitioners failed to appear before the court.

Summary

The petitioners, Anil Kumar Sinha and Pappu Sinha, filed a civil revision in 2020 but failed to appear before the court on multiple scheduled dates despite repeated adjournments. The court noted their continued absence on 27‑11‑2025, 08‑01‑2026, 30‑01‑2026, 18‑02‑2026 and 13‑03‑2026. No counsel appeared on behalf of either party. Considering the petitioners' persistent non‑appearance, the judge dismissed the revision petition for default. The order was pronounced by Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya on 06‑04‑2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil revision petition may be dismissed for default due to the petitioners' failure to appear despite multiple adjournments.

Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Revision
  • Default judgment
  • Non‑appearance
  • Adjournment

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                         CIVIL REVISION No.15 of 2020
                  ======================================================
            1.     Anil Kumar Sinha, Male, aged about 61 years, Sons of Late Saryug Prasad,
                   resident of Village Mohmaddipur, P.S. and Anchal Mohiuddin Nagar,
                   District- Samastipur.
            2.     Pappu Sinha, Male, aged about 47 years, Son of Late Saryug Prasad,
                   resident of village Mohmaddipur, P.S. and Anchal Mohiuddin Nagar,
                   District- Samastipur.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                  Suresh Singh, Son of Late Nageshwar Singh, resident of Village Maniar P.S.
                  and Anchal Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur.
                                                                         ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :       None
                  For the Respondent/s   :       None
                  ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                        ORAL ORDER
37   06-04-2026                 On several dates i.e., on 27.11.2025, 08.01.2026,

                    30.01.2026, 18.02.2026 and 13.03.2026, nobody appears on

                    behalf of the petitioners.

                                2. On perusal of the records, it appears that this Civil

                    Revision is of the year 2020 and the petitioners are absented for

                    last several dates, taking regular adjournments and even today,

                    on repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners,

                    so in the above circumstances, this Civil Revision is dismissed

                    for default.

                                                           (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Anand Kr.

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.