Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dev Narayan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court granted permission to withdraw the application, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners filed an application seeking the Court's permission to withdraw the pending writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the Court allow the withdrawal. The Court granted the permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original writ were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw a pending writ application

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • procedural order
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                        CIVIL REVIEW No.104 of 2024
                                                        In
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1885 of 2020
                  ======================================================
            1.     Dev Narayan Paswan Son of Late Shyam Lal Paswan Resident of Village-
                   Goasi, Police Station- K. Nagar, District- Purnea.
            2.    Dinesh Mehta, Son of Fantu Mehta Resident of Village- Goasi, Police
                  Station- K. Nagar, District- Purnea.
            3.    Turai Yadav @ Turo Yadav, Son of Chhedi Yadav Resident of Village-
                  Goasi, Police Station- K. Nagar, District- Purnea.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land
                  Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    The Collector, Purnea.
                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Additional Advocate General 12
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                          and
                          HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                        ORAL ORDER
                  (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

3    30-01-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission

                    to withdraw this application.

                                 2. Permission is granted.

                                 3. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                                  (Sudhir Singh, J)


                                               ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
shahzad/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.