Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ALOK KUMAR PANDEY

256 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

Ketan Chaudhary @ Ketan Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Ketan Chaudhary filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Darbhanga, which dismissed his complaint (Case No. 437 of 2022) under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code on the ground that no sanction order was on record. The complaint alleged assault …

Rajeev KumarversusSmt Arati Kumari

WITHDRAWN

Rajeev Kumar filed an appeal against his wife Arati Kumari in the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the appellant’s counsel, Mr. Satish Chandra, requested permission to withdraw the appeal. The bench, comprising Justices Nani Tagia and Alok Kumar Pandey, granted the request. Consequently, the …

Seema SinghversusPawan Kumar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Seema Singh, filed a miscellaneous appeal before the Patna High Court against the respondent, Pawan Kumar. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Mr. Mayank Singh, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court considered the request and granted permission to …

Rishu ShreeversusThe Special Vigilance Unit, Bihar, Patna

WITHDRAWN

Rishu Shree filed a criminal writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the Special Vigilance Unit, Bihar and the Directorate of Enforcement. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition and to pursue his grievance in a more appropriate …

Harendra Kumar @ H.K NiralaversusRita Kumari

DISPOSED

The appellant, Harendra Kumar, filed a miscellaneous appeal before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of a lower court. During the hearing, the appellant’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the appeal and to be allowed to file an appropriate petition thereafter. The Court …

Nathu SahversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Nathu Sah, filed Special Leave Application No.7 of 2026 arising from a 2007 criminal case. During the hearing on 16‑04‑2026, counsel for the appellant requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether it could grant such permission. Justice Alok Kumar …

RANJEET KUMAR SINGHversusRANJU BHARTI

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought revision of a family court order directing him to pay Rs 7,000 per month as maintenance to the respondent. Both parties presented an amicable settlement whereby the petitioner would pay Rs 5,000 per month in five equal installments, starting the first week of May 2026. The …

Renu Devi @ Renu KumariversusJitendra Mishra

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Renu Devi, filed a miscellaneous appeal before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court considered the procedural propriety of allowing a withdrawal at that stage. It granted the request, …

Mala MishraversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mala Mishra filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials. The petitioner, through counsel, asserted that the grievance underlying the petition had already been redressed. Consequently, the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw …

Chandan Prakash PandeyversusThe Union of India

DISMISSED

Chandan Prakash Pandey, appointed as a probationer in the Indian Revenue Service (Customs & Central Excise) Group‑A in 2016, completed his training and passed the required departmental examinations. He was arrested on 27 June 2019 for allegedly accepting a bribe, placed under deemed suspension, and …

Manish Kumar Singh,versusThe State of Bihar.

WITHDRAWN

Manish Kumar Singh appealed a criminal revision order before the Patna High Court. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Binay Kumar, sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The bench, comprising Justices Nani Tagia and Alok Kumar Pandey, considered the request and granted permission for …

KARI SAHUversusArhul Devi

WITHDRAWN

Kari Sahu filed a criminal revision petition (No. 591 of 2023) arising from a 2017 complaint case. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits …

Balmiki SinghversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Balmiki Singh filed a criminal writ petition before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court, after hearing the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. …

MD. SIBBU @ MD. SHIBU @ MD. REHANversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, MD Sibbu, filed a criminal revision petition (No.590 of 2023) arising from PS Case No.399 of 2015 in the Gaya district. The petition sought relief against the State of Bihar. During the hearing on 23-03-2026, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, requested permission to …

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Mukesh Kumar filed Criminal Revision No.630 of 2023 before the Patna High Court, arising out of PS Case No.46 of 2023 at Begusarai. The petition challenged the actions of the State of Bihar and another respondent. On 23-03-2026, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court’s permission to withdraw …

ARSHAD ZAMANversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Arshad Zaman, filed a criminal revision petition (No. 639 of 2023) before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of the lower court. During the hearing on 23-03-2026, the petitioner's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether a …

RAJ KUMAR JHAversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners filed a criminal revision petition (No. 737 of 2023) before the Patna High Court. They later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits …

Tetar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Tetar Kumar was granted anticipatory bail on 7 October 2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 70630 of 2025. He failed to appear before the court and furnish the required bail bonds within the six‑week period because he was out of state and only returned on 23 December 2025. On 18 March 2026, …

Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Kumar Das @ Kanhai Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife in a dowry‑related dispute. He applied for bail after an earlier bail plea had been rejected on merit, arguing that he has no prior criminal record, the victim …

RAJEEV KUMAR GIRI @ RAJEEV GIRIversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Giri, filed Criminal Revision No.191 of 2023 arising from PS Case No.99 of 2021, challenging a decision of the lower court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that he and the respondent, Jyoti Giri, are residing together and have no further grievance. …

BEBI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Bebi Devi filed a criminal revision petition (Criminal Revision No.232 of 2023) arising from PS Case No.81 of 2016 in Munger. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the revision petition. The court considered the request and found no impediment …

VINAY CHANDRA JHAversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Vinay Chandra Jha filed a criminal revision before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested to withdraw the revision. The court entertained the request and dismissed the revision as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were examined. The order effectively terminates …

MD. JAVEDversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, MD Javed, filed Criminal Revision No. 482 of 2023 arising from a 2021 police station case in Jamui, Bihar. On 16‑03‑2026, the petitioner's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the revision petition. The State's counsel did not raise any objection to the withdrawal. The …

MUKESH KUMAR JHAversusPOONAM DEVI

WITHDRAWN

Mukesh Kumar Jha filed a criminal revision petition (No. 561 of 2023) in the Patna High Court. He later informed the court that a compromise petition had been filed in the Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhubani, and he wished to withdraw the revision petition. The respondent, Poonam Devi, did not …

PRADEEP BAITHAversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Pradeep Baitha, filed Criminal Revision No.588 of 2023 arising from PS case No.383 of 2022 against the State of Bihar. The petition was presented through his natural guardian, his mother, Ranju Devi. The petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the revision …

AMAR KUMARversusThe Central Bureau of Investigation CBI

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Amar Kumar, filed a criminal revision petition before the Patna High Court. He later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …

Ram Pravesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Ram Pravesh Kumar and Pradeep Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Warisaliganj PS Case No. 450/2025) that alleged their involvement in a land‑related extortion and assault incident. They argued that the FIR contained only vague, omnibus allegations, that there …

Madan SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Madan Sah applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Sahiyara PS No.203/2025) alleging he assaulted his cousin’s hand, invoking Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioner argued that he has no criminal record, the injury was to a …

Kunal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kunal Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, attempted murder and illegal possession of arms, arising from a dispute with a local headmaster. The petitioner claimed the allegations were fabricated, citing a short distance between the crime scene and the police station, a …

Ayush Mishra @ Ayush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four members of the Mishra family, were named in an FIR for alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from an incident during the Chhath festival, where a bomb (claimed to be a cracker) was allegedly thrown and injuries were inflicted. They …

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin SahniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No.190 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S.S. 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted the informant’s family members, including inflicting …

Kishun Rai @ Kishan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kishun Rai sought anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No. 264/2025 for alleged assault on an informant using an iron rod, resulting in a simple head injury. The petitioner claimed innocence, citing a three‑day delay in filing the FIR, contradictory statements by the informant, and a …

Raushan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four residents of Umgaow village, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Harlakhi P.S. Case No.238 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault, robbery and attempt to murder. The prosecution alleged that on 20 August 2025 the …

Nandlal SahversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Nandlal Sah and Asha Devi, parents of the alleged rapist Ramkrishna Sah, were named as accused in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 376, 504/34 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the allegations against them …

Soma GhoshversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Soma Ghosh, an Assistant Commissioner in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS), applied for a Deputy Commissioner post through a direct recruitment advertisement in December 2022 but was not selected. Another candidate, T. Pritam Singh, was selected but could not be appointed due to lack of required …

Biteshwar Nath PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Biteshwar Nath Pandey, challenged an order dated 25‑10‑2025 of the Collector‑cum‑District Magistrate, Kaimur, which directed the confiscation and auction of his Mahindra XUV 500 vehicle under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The order was based on sections 30(a), 32(1)(3) …

Sugi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sugi Devi, filed a writ petition seeking the release of her Honda SP 125 motorcycle seized during a raid that recovered 15.800 litres of illicit liquor, leading to a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. She requested liberty to file an application …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Collector‑cum‑District Magistrate of Saran to release his truck seized for alleged involvement in the recovery of 555.78 litres of illicit liquor. The seizure was made under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …

Anuj Sharma @ Anuj Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anuj Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his seized Hero Splendor+ motorcycle, which was confiscated under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged involvement in an illicit liquor case. He requested liberty to file a petition under Rule 12A of the …

Ajay Kumar SinghversusState of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his Mahindra TUV 300 vehicle seized in connection with a criminal case (Patna Byepass P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024) under IPC sections 328, 379, 420 and 34. He asserted ownership of the vehicle and claimed no involvement in …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chandan Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the release of his Mahindra Scorpio vehicle seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 in connection with a liquor seizure case. The petitioners requested liberty to file an application under Rule 12A of the Bihar …

Urmila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Urmila Devi filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29-10-2025 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge under Section 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner, through counsel, sought liberty to pursue the challenge via the appropriate legal remedy …

Rajmangal SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajmangal Sahani sought the release of a Mahindra Bolero vehicle seized in connection with an illicit liquor case under Section 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He filed an application on 22‑10‑2024 under Rule 12A …

Rishikesh ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rishikesh Thakur, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his seized Maruti Suzuki Dzire vehicle, which was confiscated under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged involvement in the recovery of illicit liquor. The High Court examined whether …

Sunil Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sunil Kumar Prasad filed a writ petition seeking the release of his TVS Jupiter Scooty, which was seized for allegedly containing 36.84 litres of illicit liquor under Section 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, …

Gautam YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gautam Yadav, challenged an order dated 08.12.2025 of the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Siwan, which directed the release of his truck upon payment of a penalty equal to 35% of its insurance value under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The …

Raviprakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raviprakash Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging the Collector‑cum‑District Magistrate’s order of vehicle confiscation dated 12‑09‑2025 and the Excise Commissioner’s order dismissing his appeal. The High Court noted that the petitioner may seek a revision petition under Section …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought the release of his Toyota Urban Cruiser vehicle seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged involvement in the recovery of illicit liquor. The petitioner requested liberty to file a petition under Rule 12A of the Bihar …

Suryabhan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suryabhan Rai, challenged the order dated 20.01.2026 by the Collector‑cum‑District Magistrate, Buxar, which directed the confiscation of his Tata Safari vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly transporting 127.62 litres of illicit …

Alina MajumdarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Alina Majumdar filed a writ petition seeking release of her vehicle seized by excise officials after 3.5 litres of illicit liquor were found in it. The District Magistrate ordered release only upon payment of a penalty of Rs 4,97,532 and an additional 3% surcharge, invoking Rule 12A of the Bihar …

Amresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Amresh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS‑526/2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case was based on the recovery of a pistol from a co‑accused, Rahish Kumar, and the identification of the …

Mantu Kumar @ Mintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mantu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 132, 109(1), 324(4) and 303(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act arising from a raid on illicit liquor. The prosecution’s case is based on a scuffle …

Shambhu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Shambhu Yadav and Ganga Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a police case (No. 87 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault and rioting. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, assaulted an informant and …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Guddu Kumar and Sanjay Rai, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kesariya P.S. No. 549 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The police, …

Ritik KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ritik Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Sitamarhi PS Case No. 844/2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act for the recovery of 7.5 litres of Nepali Saufi from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not named in the …

Raj Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Paswan was named in a FIR for alleged involvement in the seizure of 21.240 litres of illicit English liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based solely on the statement of co-accused Shailendra Tiwary. The petitioner contended that he was not …

Bittu Kumar @ Ansh RajversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was named in an FIR (Sultanganj PS Case No. 407/2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act after 51 litres of foreign liquor were recovered based on secret information. The petitioner contended that he was not present at the …

Mithilesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mithilesh Kumar Singh, the registered owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case where 8.640 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered near the vehicle during a police patrol. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the scene, nothing was seized from his possession, and that mere …

Rohit KumarversusThe Sate of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, relating to the seizure of 50 litres of illicit liquor and a mobile phone. The prosecution’s case was based on a secret …

Dilip MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four residents of Newari Tola, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning illicit liquor recovered from a diyara area. The prosecution’s case relied on secret information and …

Shivanand Gandhi @ GandhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case where 355.5 liters of foreign liquor were seized from a Mahindra car, and the petitioner was named in the FIR based on secret information whose source was not disclosed. The petitioner argued he was neither the owner nor driver of the vehicle, no …

Anil ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Anil and Manoj Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Town P.S. No. 531 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 100 litres of toddy from their shop. The prosecution’s case is based on …

Ranjeet Ray @ NariyalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Ranjeet Ray and Abhinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS‑767/2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for possession of illicit country‑made liquor. The prosecution’s case relied on recovery of …

Deva RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Deva Rai and his son Mithun Ray, were named in FIR No. 883 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act relating to the recovery of 50 litres of illicit liquor from a public place. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the …

Bablu Nut @ Bablu NatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bablu Nut, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the seizure of 50 litres of illicit country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He claimed he was not present at the place of recovery, that the liquor was found in an …

Deepak Kumar @ Ankush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Deepak Kumar was named in FIR No.191 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based solely on the statement of co‑accused Chandan Kumar. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the scene, no illicit liquor was recovered from his possession, …

Pandav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Pandav Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being named in a FIR for alleged possession of 134.820 litres of foreign liquor seized from a Maruti car, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act. The prosecution’s case relied on a co‑accused’s statement that the petitioner …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 24 litres of country-made liquor recovered from a joint family house. The prosecution’s case was based on a secret informant’s …

Shivraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shivraj Kumar was implicated in a case (Sare PS Case No. 150 of 2025) under Section 310(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly planning a dacoity while riding a motorcycle. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, lack of criminal antecedent, and that the motorcycle was improperly seized …

Pintu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Pintu Yadav and Virendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Harnaut PS Case No. 431 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in an assault on an …

Rohit RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Rohit Rai and Sandeep Rai, were implicated in FIR No. 187 of 2025 for alleged assault and robbery under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. They claimed innocence, arguing that no specific overt act of assault could be attributed to them and that the allegations were general …

Sanjeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three residents of Supaul district, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 72 litres of foreign liquor were seized from a car they allegedly fled from. They contended they were not …

Harendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Harendra Manjhi and Shobha Devi were ordered by the Patna High Court on 28 May 2025 to surrender within six weeks and furnish bail bonds in connection with an excise case (Kotwa PS Case No. 15 of 2022). They failed to do so because they were residing outside Bihar for livelihood and …

Vikash Chandra OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vikash Chandra Ojha, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated as the owner of a motorcycle from which 87 litres of illicit Nepali liquor was recovered in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the scene, had no knowledge of the …

Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 150 litres of illicit Mahua liquor from a scooty that he had lent to co‑accused Jaj Paswan. The prosecution alleged a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act, but the petitioner argued that he …

Uttam Basak @ UttamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Uttam Basak, the registered owner of a motorcycle, was implicated when 2.5 litre of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the vehicle and he was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he was not present at …

Badhan Paswan @ Badhan PasavanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Badhan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR (Imamganj PS Case No. 115 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act involving 70 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a forest area. The prosecution’s …

Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Raj Kumar, owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 21 litres of illicit Nepali liquor recovered from the vehicle, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, was not present at the scene, and had …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case of illicit liquor seizure under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, was not the owner of the tempo from which liquor was recovered, and was not present at the scene, …

Rajesh ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rajesh Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, wherein 10 litres of country‑made Mahua liquor was recovered from his courtyard. He argued that the premises were open, not …

Karu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Karu Paswan, a landless labourer, was granted regular bail on 5 December 2025 with the condition that the bailor must be a close family member such as father, mother, sister, brother, wife, or the person who swore the affidavit. He pleaded that his family is impoverished and possesses no …

Jai Rai @ Jai Narayan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jai Rai, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Malsalami P.S. Case No. 76 of 2025) under Sections 37 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, for alleged possession of illicit Mahua liquor recovered from an e‑rickshaw. The prosecution alleged that …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a 2018 case (PS No. 256) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on a co-accused’s statement that they supplied 10 litres of Mahua liquor. The …

Momindra Paswan @ Momindar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Momindra Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act involving 20 litres of illicit Mahua liquor recovered from a public garden. The prosecution alleged his involvement based on local …

Govind Kumar @ Govinda KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the recovery of 9 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a paddy field adjacent to a godown. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …

Indal Chaudhary @ Indal ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Indal Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 33 litres of country-made liquor from his tin‑roofed shop in Siwaipatti, Muzaffarpur, alleging a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was not …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case where 639 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a Tata Intra‑Pickup vehicle bearing his registration. A co‑accused named him, but he claimed the vehicle was being used without his knowledge and that he was not present at the scene. The …

Manish Kumar @ Anurag SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manish Kumar, a labourer, was implicated in Excise Case No. 118C2 of 2019 for the alleged recovery of 39.6 litres of foreign liquor based on secret information. The petitioner argued that he was not present at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and that the source of the secret information …

SURAJ CHAUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Suraj Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Bairiya PS Case No. 615 of 2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for possession of 60 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the statements …

Jitesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jitesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that, based on secret information, the police recovered 1616.64 litres of foreign …

Chandan Sahni @ Chandan SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chandan Sahni, was named in FIR No.441 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 involving the recovery of 17 litres of illicit country-made liquor. He contended that he was not present at the open place of recovery, …

Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Pratap YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, wherein 86.4 litres of foreign liquor were seized from a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner …

Habibur Rahman @ Habib Ur RahmanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Habibur Rahman, the owner of an e‑rickshaw, was implicated in a case (Rampur P.S. Case No. 436 of 2025) where 70 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from the vehicle. The petitioner argued that he merely rented the e‑rickshaw to Md. Aman Raj, was not named in the FIR, had no knowledge of …

Nikhil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nikhil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 31.5 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle he owned in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, was not …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, filed an application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 15-10-2025 that required him to surrender and furnish bail bonds within six weeks. He claimed he could not comply because his employer at a cloth factory in Surat did not grant him leave, preventing him …

Umesh Chaudhary @ Rocky Kumar @ RockyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Umesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging his involvement in the recovery of 160 litres of illicit country-made liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution’s case …

Pukari yadav @ Pukari kumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pukari Yadav, was implicated in a FIR alleging that 11.250 litres of foreign liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and that he fled the scene. He contended that he is not the owner of the motorcycle, was not present at the place of occurrence, and had no possession of the liquor, …

Bittu Kumar @ Ansh RajversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Sultanganj PS Case No. 406 of 2025) for alleged possession of 5.25 litres of illicit English wine under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. The prosecution claimed the wine was recovered …

Bablu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bablu Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (as amended in 2022), wherein 50 litres of country-made mahua liquor was recovered from an open area in front of his house. …

Nakeshar Ray @ Nageshwar RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nakeshar Ray, sought anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No. 565 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act involving 462 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a public street. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was …

Mintu Mahto @ Mintu Kumar MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mintu Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged possession of 7.8 litres of country‑made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered from a motorcycle and that local witnesses …

Renu KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Renu Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 60 litres of country‑made Mahua wine from her motorcycle in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was being transported by a co‑accused, Nikku Kumar …

Budhan Yadav @ Budheshwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Budhan Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS Case No. 438 of 2025) for alleged possession of 159.39 litres of foreign liquor recovered from a house attributed to him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner argued that he had no …

Sakil @ Mohammad SakilversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sakil @ Mohammad Sakil, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 273/2023) under Section 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, where 120 kg of Mahua flower was recovered from a tempo. The prosecution alleged the petitioner was involved, but he had …

Shahbuddin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shahbuddin Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after a police case alleged that 55 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from his motorcycle (Reg. No. BR28U-5856). He contended that he was unaware of the motorcycle's use by co‑accused Amarjeet Yadav and had no criminal …

NISHANT KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nishant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging possession of illicit foreign liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution alleged that 116.1 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from the …

Bhim YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Bhim Yadav and Santu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the recovery of 240 litres of illicit liquor, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amended). They argued that the liquor was recovered from an …

Kuldeep SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Kuldeep Sharma, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 7.5 litres of illicit foreign liquor from behind his house in Purnea, alleging a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution relied on secret information and eyewitness …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Bairgania PS Case No. 257 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, involving the seizure of 288 litres of illicit Nepali liquor. The …

Rakhi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rakhi Devi, the owner of a motorcycle, sought anticipatory bail after a co‑accused, Manish Kumar, was found with 750 ml of foreign liquor on his person during a police raid. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was being transported in the motorcycle, invoking Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar …

Pawan Sao @ Pawan SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 23 litres of illicit country-made liquor from his e‑rickshaw in Ghoswari, Patna, and arrested three co‑accused. The petitioner argued he was not named in the FIR, was not present at the scene, and merely owned the vehicle which was …

Ram Uday Tanti @ Uday TantiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ram Uday Tanti was implicated in an excise case where 4 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a motorcycle parked inside his joint family house. The prosecution alleged that the motorcycle and liquor belonged to him, invoking Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025, wherein the prosecution alleged recovery of 954.720 litres of illicit foreign liquor from his residence, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) …

Vikash Kumar Prasad @ Vikas Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging possession of 53.48 litres of foreign liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He contended that he had vacated the rented flat a month …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Narhat P.S. Case No. 217 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 5.250 litres of foreign liquor. The liquor was seized from a plastic tray, and the …

RAMNATH SAHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ramnath Sah, was implicated in a case (Riga P.S. Case No. 435 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, after a co‑accused claimed the illicit liquor recovered from a scooty was purchased from him. The petitioner …

Tunna Singh @ Tunna Kumar @ Tunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Tunna Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being named in a FIR alleging his involvement in the recovery of 90 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle, offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The prosecution claimed …

Saurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging that 110.625 litres of foreign liquor were recovered from a Swift Dezire car in Runnisaidpur, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act. The prosecution alleged his involvement based on local …

GurnekversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Gurnek, owner of an auto‑rickshaw, faced arrest in a case where 90 litres of illicit Nepali liquor were recovered from the vehicle. He contended that he merely rented the rickshaw to a driver, had no knowledge of the contraband, was not present at the scene, and possessed a clean …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in an excise case where 2 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from his vehicle and three co‑accused were arrested. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, had lent the motorcycle to Basant Yadav, and had no knowledge of …

Amar Kumar @ AmanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Amar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police, based on secret information, recovered 22 litres of illicit country-made Chulai liquor from behind his house and alleged his involvement. The petitioner argued he was not present at the scene, had no criminal record, and no …

Abhishek Yadav @ Abhishek Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Abhishek Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to the recovery of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner fled the scene, while the …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was implicated in a case (Pasraha P.S. Case No. 245 of 2025) for alleged possession of 10 litres of country‑made liquor recovered from a house he jointly occupied, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (Amended) 2022. He contended that he …

Raman Yadav @ Raman Kumar Yadav @ Raman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raman Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, based on the recovery of 9.375 litres of illicit liquor from a hut he allegedly occupied. The prosecution argued that the …

Shiv Mangal Pandey @ Sheo Mangal PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shiv Mangal Pandey applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered 8.625 litres of illicit liquor and a motorcycle in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was not named in the FIR, had no knowledge that his motorcycle was used to transport the …

Pramod Kumar Yadav @ Pramod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Pramod Kumar Yadav was named in FIR No. 221 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 involving 72 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a motorcycle. The co-accused identified the petitioner, who denied ownership of the …

Sangita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sangita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the illegal manufacture of 15 litres of country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was …

Jagrita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jagrita Devi sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 5 litres of illicit country-made liquor from her residence, punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She argued that she was not present at the location, the …

Raju PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Raju Prakash, the owner of a motorcycle from which 3.75 litres of illicit liquor was recovered, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, was not present …

Sandeep Patel @ Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Sandeep Patel and Mukesh Patel, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 18 litres of foreign liquor from the bank of Koiripati Dam. The prosecution’s case …

Tuntun Ray @ Tuntun RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Tuntun Ray, was named in an FIR for possession of 120 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered from a motorcycle, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and Sections 274, 275, 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The co‑accused …

Chunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chunnu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving 15 litres of illicit liquor recovered from his scooter, which was allegedly used by co‑accused Rahul Kumar. The prosecution alleged a violation of Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, …

Mani SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mani Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 243.360 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was seized from a field and that …

Bhuneshwar PandeyversusDr. B. Rajender

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhuneshwar Pandey, filed a contempt petition challenging an order dated 29 Oct 2024 in which the High Court had directed him to approach the District Magistrate‑Collector to seek proper acquisition of his land before a public road could be constructed. He claimed that the Rural Works …

IndiaversusNarayan Pandit

DISPOSED

The Union of India, represented by various postal officials, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's order dated 13 August 2024, which had allowed the sole respondent's original application and referenced a letter dated 26 October 2023 that the …

Bulet Yadav @ Bulat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bulat Yadav, challenged the confiscation of his motorcycle ordered by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate following an excise case where illicit liquor was recovered from the vehicle. He sought quashing of the confiscation order and release of the motorcycle. The Court examined Rule 12A of …

Prashant Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Sarita Kumari filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition. The opposite party, represented by counsel, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court examined the request …

Bhagmani Mahto @ Bhagmani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The police raided Surendra Mahto’s house in Amnour Dih on confidential information and recovered 25.920 litres of illicit foreign liquor, leading to an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms ordered the release of the house but …

Dayamanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Dayamanti Devi, the petitioner, owned a parcel of land that was sealed and subjected to confiscation proceedings after a raid recovered illicit liquor from a sack hidden in garbage on her premises. The liquor was linked to two accused individuals, Ranjit Kumar and Rahul Kumar, who had no connection …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Rinku Devi, through counsel, expressed a desire not to pursue the writ petition filed against the State of Bihar and other officials. The court noted the petitioner's request and, accordingly, dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive merits of the …

Anup SavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Anup Sav sought the release of a Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle seized by police under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 after 1,950 kg of bhang were recovered from it. He requested liberty to file a petition under Section 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise …

Lalji Sahani @ Lalji KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Lalji Sahani, filed an application seeking modification of the order dated 24‑09‑2025 to correct a clerical error in his address and to obtain an extension of time to furnish bail bonds. The order mistakenly recorded his address as Village‑Dipahu, Dhangad Toli, P.S.‑Kotwa, whereas …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner Kundan Kumar had been granted anticipatory bail on 04.11.2025 with a direction to surrender and furnish bail bonds within six weeks. He failed to comply because he was residing outside the state and could not communicate with his lawyer. He filed an application seeking a modification …

Anand Bhushan Yadav @ Prabhunath YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

DISMISSED

This order was passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.55055 of 2024, arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No.82 of 2021, District Saran. The petitioner, Anand Bhushan Yadav @ Prabhunath Yadav, did not appear on 09.01.2026. When the matter was called out again, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. …

Lal Mohan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Mohan Singh, filed a contempt petition challenging the State of Bihar and officials for not directing payment of enhanced compensation for his land acquired under a 2015 award. He had previously received a compensation of Rs. 2,74,189 and sought a higher amount after the land was …

Kishun Patel @ ThekedarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishun Patel, sought confirmation of a provisional bail that had been granted on 8 October 2024. He argued that the FIR lodged on 28 August 2024 under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code was improper because the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 had come into force on 1 …

Sikandar Kumar @ Sikandra Kumar @ Kikendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, had been granted anticipatory bail on 1 September 2025 with a condition to surrender and furnish bail bonds within six weeks. He failed to comply, citing his employment and residence in Haryana and communication issues with his lawyer, and offered an unconditional …

Moktar @ MokhtarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Moktar, had been granted anticipatory bail on 27 May 2025 with a direction to surrender and furnish bail bonds within six weeks. He failed to comply because his wife fell seriously ill with hepatitis, preventing him from meeting the deadline. The petitioner submitted medical evidence …

Rajkumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajkumar Choudhary, filed a writ petition seeking the de‑sealing of rooms in his residential house that had been sealed under Excise Case No. 92/2025 for the recovery of illicit liquor. The petitioner argued that the sealed rooms were jointly possessed with his wife, Rina Devi, who …

Hemant Kumar Singh @ Hiraya Pratap SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Hemant Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the de‑sealing of his house, which had been sealed under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 after the recovery of 155.520 litres of illicit foreign liquor. He contended that the house was in joint possession …

Arjun SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arjun Sharma filed a writ petition seeking the release of his house in Nawada, which had been sealed after a raid recovered 4.95 litres of foreign liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The liquor was linked to his son, Ranjeet Kumar, who had been granted bail, but …

Bablu Kumar Mahto @ Bablu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bablu Mahto, was arrested after his vehicle was intercepted by police who discovered 85.125 litres of illicit foreign liquor. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and the Senior Deputy Collector imposed a penalty of 40 % of the vehicle’s …

Guru Charan Singh PuniyaversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guru Charan Singh Puniya, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking the provisional release of a Tata LPT truck (Reg. No. ML 04 F-7788) seized on 16-10-2025 under Unit Case No. 11/2025-26. The seizure was effected by the Customs (Preventive) authorities, and the …

M/s Aadya EnterprisesversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

M/s Aadya Enterprises filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash the cancellation of its registration under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and to set aside an appellate order dismissing its appeal on the ground of limitation. The appeal had been filed 34 months and 20 days …

Panacea Biotec Ltd.,versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Panacea Biotec Ltd. filed refund applications under Section 68 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the years 2015-16 and 2016-17. The petitioner alleged that the Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Respondent No.4) had failed to dispose of these applications. The petitioner sought a writ …

Era Infra Engineering LimitedversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Era Infra Engineering Ltd filed a writ petition challenging several orders of the Bihar tax authorities that rejected its request for scrutiny of VAT returns for FY 2013‑14 to 2017‑18, imposed tax, penalty and interest, and denied refunds for earlier years. The petitioner sought quashing of the …

Rupesh KumarversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 06.03.2024 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which had dismissed his original application and held the chargesheet valid. The High Court observed that during the pendency of the original application, a …

Rakesh ManiversusThe Union of India

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rakesh Mani filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court seeking a direction to the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Patna Bench, to finally hear and dispose of his pending application (No. 529/2022) challenging a transfer order dated 10‑06‑2022. The court noted that the …

Manohar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manohar Rai filed a writ petition seeking the release of his truck, seized by Siwan Excise officials in connection with the recovery of 820,800 litres of illicit foreign liquor. The seizure was made under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 against …

ChandaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Chandani, wife of Manoj Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking release of her motorcycle seized under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 in a case against her husband and Vishal Gupta. She requested liberty to file a …

Anil Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition challenging two orders: one by the Collector cum District Magistrate, Kaimur, confiscating his vehicle, and another by the Excise Commissioner, Bihar. The petitioner sought liberty to file a revision petition under Section 93 of the Bihar …

Krishna Murari JeeversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Krishna Murari Jee filed a writ petition seeking the release of his goods‑carrying tempo, which had been seized by police in connection with an excise case involving illicit liquor. The petitioner asserted that the vehicle, though bearing a different registration number, was stolen on …

Avakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Avakash Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.03.2024 of the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Samastipur, which had confiscated his vehicle under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise law. The petitioner sought liberty to appeal the confiscation order under Section 92 of the Bihar …

Pawan Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Sahni, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the District Magistrate‑Collector of Gopalganj to accept his title deed of immovable property and to return the bank guarantee he had furnished for the release of a seized Bolero pick‑up van. Earlier, a 2019 High …

Govind Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the confiscation order of his premises and to obtain release of the property on payment of a penalty under Rule 12B of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Rule, 2022. The lower authorities had confirmed the …

Md. Hasmuddeen AliversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Hasmuddeen Ali, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a confiscation order that directed his stolen motorcycle to be auctioned. He alleged that the bike was stolen in May 2022 and later seized in September 2023 during a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …

Yoganand MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Yoganand Mehta & Ors., filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. They later moved an application seeking the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel, Mr. Bipin Kumar, requested the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing, granted permission to …

M/s Solanki Engicon Private LimitedversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

M/s Solanki Engicon Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging a memo that rejected its technical bid for a MMGSY tender on the ground of alleged discrepancies in its reported annual turnover. The petitioner argued that the difference between figures in its annual return and Form 26AS did not …

Dev Narayan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners filed an application seeking the Court's permission to withdraw the pending writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the Court allow the withdrawal. The Court granted the permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed …

Ramesh MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners filed an application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the proceeding. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The bench, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed …

Yaduvansham Infrastructure Private LimitedversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Yaduvansham Infrastructure Private Limited was blacklisted for two years by the Rural Works Department of Bihar on the ground that its experience certificate was allegedly forged. The petitioner contended that the blacklisting order and the subsequent appellate order were passed without any hearing, …

Shobha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shobha Devi, filed a petition seeking restoration of Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 329 of 2021, which had been dismissed for non‑compliance with a peremptory order dated 30‑01‑2025. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the defects were inadvertent and promised to cure the remaining …

Indu Kumari @ Indu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Indu Kumari filed a petition challenging actions of the State of Bihar and various officials. The petitioner, through counsel, indicated a desire to withdraw the petition, noting that the name of Respondent No.9 also appeared in related proceedings. The court considered the withdrawal request and, …

Md. Wasim UddinversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Wasim Uddin, filed a petition under the Letters Patent to restore an appeal (L.P.A. No. 711 of 2019) that had been dismissed on 17 May 2022 for want of prosecution. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Nazir Alam, explained that he fell suddenly ill and was therefore unable to attend …

Rahmati Khatoon @ RahmativersusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahmati Khatoon filed a writ petition seeking the release of her three-wheeler (Toto) seized by police in connection with the recovery of 77 litres of illicit liquor. The vehicle was seized under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 in a case registered …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Manju Devi, sought de‑sealing and release of a ground‑floor flat that had been sealed under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 after police recovered 568.44 litres of illicit liquor from the premises, which was being rented to Munna Kumar. The petitioner argued she had no …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the release of his seized Pulsar motorcycle, which had been impounded after 35 litres of illicit spirit were recovered from it in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner argued that the vehicle, kept in an open space at the …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the release of his Honda motorcycle (Reg. No. BR29AU3627) seized by the Excise Police in connection with the recovery of 70 litres of illicit spirit, under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The vehicle had been kept in an …

Gayatri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Gayatri Devi, through counsel, indicated that she does not wish to pursue the writ petition filed in the Patna High Court. The court noted the petitioner's intention to withdraw the proceedings. Accordingly, the judges dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed. No …

Md. Anmarul Haque @ Md. Anwarul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 2 May 2025 that directed the confiscation and auction of his Scorpio vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, in connection with a case involving illicit Mahua liquor. The High Court granted the …