Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s Nesh India Infrastructure Private Ltd.versusSavita Sah

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court disposed of the civil review on the basis of the parties' compromise.

Summary

M/s Nesh India Infrastructure Private Ltd. filed a civil review against Savita Sah and Sita Ram Singh. Both parties negotiated and executed a joint compromise, filing a supplementary affidavit and a copy of the compromise petition. They also executed and registered exchange deeds on 23-02-2026, transferring mutual rights in land and flats and regularising possession. The learned counsel for both sides submitted that the compromise settled all disputes. The Hon'ble Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra, after considering the submissions and the affidavit, ordered the case to be disposed of on the basis of the compromise.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court can dispose of the civil review on the basis of a joint compromise and executed exchange deeds

Subjects

  • civil review
  • compromise
  • exchange deed
  • possession
  • land transfer
  • settlement

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                         CIVIL REVIEW No.9 of 2025
                                                        In
                                    Miscellaneous Appeal No.296 of 2021
                  ======================================================
                  M/s Nesh India Infrastructure Private Ltd. having its registered office at Nesh
                  Inn Building 19 and 20, Kidwaipuri, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna at
                  present C/o S.B. Sinha, Commercial Block, Tiruvantpuram City, AG Sector
                  Ashopur Road, Khagaul, Danapur, Town and District- Patna Through its
                  Managing Director Mr. Shashi Bhushan Sinha, Male, aged about 57 years,
                  son of Late Chandrika Prasad, resident of 501, Laxmi Hari Niwas, Nageshwar
                  Colony, Kavi Raman Path, P.S.- Buddha Colony, District- Patna- 800001.

                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
            1.    Savita Sah Wife of Sri Ram Babu Sah, A 416, Hazari House, South West
                  Corner of Park, A.G. Colony, Patna- 800025.
            2.    Sita Ram Singh, Son of Sri Indira Deo Singh, A-488, East Corner of Park,
                  A.G. Colony, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna, Pin Code- 800025.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Raushan, Advocate.
                                                 Mr. Sahil Kumar, Advocate.
                  For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                        ORAL ORDER

13   24-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    counsel for the opposite parties.

                                  2. Learned counsel for the parties submits that both

                    the parties have compromised the matter and a copy of joint

                    compromise petition has been brought on record by way of

                    filing supplementary affidavit, therefore, the present case may

                    be disposed of on the basis of compromise.

                                  3. Learned counsel for the parties submits that the

                    parties have executed and registered Exchange Deeds dated
          Patna High Court C. REV. No.9 of 2025(13) dt.24-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                    23.02.2026, whereby the mutual rights in land and flats have

                    been transferred and possession has been regularized as per the

                    schedules mentioned therein.

                                 4. The compromise petition has been duly signed by

                    both the parties.

                                 5. In view of the submission of learned for the parties

                    and considering the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of

                    the petitioner, the present case stands disposed of on the basis of

                    compromise taken place between the parties.



                                             (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.