Patna High Court
Aman Singh @ Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The appeal is allowed; the order refusing anticipatory bail is set aside and anticipatory bail is granted subject to conditions.
Summary
The appellants, three villagers, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant who claimed they used caste slurs and tied him up. They appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Act against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail. The appellants argued that the FIR was lodged four days after the incident and that the allegations were vague, suggesting false implication. The prosecution could not effectively counter these points. The High Court held that the delay and the general nature of the allegations warranted anticipatory bail, set aside the lower court’s order, and granted bail subject to conditions. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act when the FIR is delayed and the allegations are vague.
- Whether the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail was justified in the facts of the case.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 126(2), 3(1)(s), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 3(i)(r)
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 482(2)
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — s. 14-A(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- SC/ST Act
- scheduled caste
- scheduled tribe
- FIR delay
- false implication
- criminal procedure
- Section 14-A
- Section 482
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2785 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj
======================================================
1. Aman Singh @ Aman Kumar S/o- Late Arun Singh R/O- Khawajepur PS-
Yadopur District- Gopalganj
2. Bulet Singh @ Pawan Singh S/o- Ashok Singh R/O- Khawajepur PS-
Yadopur District- Gopalganj
3. Munna Singh @ Abishek Singh S/o- Ashok Singh R/O- Khawajepur PS-
Yadopur District- Gopalganj
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Ankit Kumar Paswan S/o- Nagina Paswan R/O- Hathtua More Rajmohan
Ward No-23, PS- Mirganj District- Gopalganj
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar
For the Respondent/s : Ms. Usha Kumari 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
5 30-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, the
learned Special P.P. Ms. Usha Kumari No.I for the State and the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST
Act”) against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide
order dated 18.06.2025 in A.B.P. No. 1029 of 2025, arising out
of Mirganj P.S. Case No.72 of 2025, passed by the learned
Additional Sessions Judge-XI-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2785 of 2025(5) dt.30-06-2026
2/4
(POA) Act, Gopalganj, registered under Sections 126(2),
115(2), 352, 351(2), 109, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections
3(i)(r), 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (POA) Act.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
appellant no.1 has antecedent of two cases, as recorded in the
supplementary affidavit and appellant no.2 and 3 are persons
with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he had gone
to market 11.02.2025 at 4.30 P.M., when five named accused
persons including the appellants along with 8-10 unknown
accused came and abused him by taking caste name, on the
pretext that informant and others do not vacate the pitch when
they come to play, on which, informant said that they were
playing from before, thereafter on order of Aman, all the
accused persons forcibly put the informant in a car and took him
to Jigna Government School and tied him and assaulted after
unveiling him by belt, lathi and also video-graphed the
occurrence, further his family members informed the police,
who came and saved him.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
appellants have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the
allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2785 of 2025(5) dt.30-06-2026
3/4
allegation of abuse and assault is general and omnibus in nature.
It is further submitted that the informant alleges in the FIR that
he was assaulted by the accused persons hence his family
members called the police and when police came, the informant
was saved but then no FIR was instituted on the date of
occurrence rather the FIR came to be instituted on 15.02.2025
i.e. after a delay of more than four days, which casts an
aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned Special Public Prosecutor and the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the appeal
but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants that
allegation of abuse and assault is general and omnibus in nature
and the FIR was instituted after a delay of more than four days.
6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel
for the appellants, let the appellants, above named, in the event
of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the
date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) each
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned court below where the case is pending in connection
with the aforesaid case, subject to the conditions as laid down
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2785 of 2025(5) dt.30-06-2026
4/4
under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and
this appeal stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.