Patna High Court
Ajay RaiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
The appeal cannot be entertained without the proper annexation of required documents.
Summary
The appellant, Ajay Rai, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.3040 of 2025 arising from PS case No.782 of 2023 before the High Court of Patna. The appeal sought relief against the State of Bihar and a co-respondent, but the appellant's counsel failed to annex the requisite documents, including the earlier rejection order. The court noted the admission by the appellant's counsel that the proper documents were not filed. Consequently, the court held that the appeal could not be entertained in its present form. The appeal was dismissed, but the court granted liberty to the appellant to file a fresh petition with all relevant documents attached.
Issues considered
- Whether an appeal can be entertained when the appellant fails to annex the required supporting documents?
Subjects
- appeal procedure
- document submission
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3040 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-782 Year-2023 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran
======================================================
Ajay Rai S/O Raghunandan Rai @ Raghunan Ray R/O Village- Marhaura,
Dist.- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Rishi Munny Devi W/O Tribhuwan Manjhi R/O Village- Baidapur, Post
Office- Bardhina, P.S- Marhaura, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Krishna Kumar Yadav
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 18-02-2026 The present appeal is listed today at Serial No. 82.
However, on the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellant, the case was taken up on a priority basis. At
this stage, learned counsel submits that he has not annexed the
proper documents along with the earlier rejection order passed
by this Court.
2. In view of the admission made on behalf of the
appellant, the present appeal is not entertained and is
accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the
appellant to file a fresh petition, annexing all relevant
documents.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
U T
Checking your session…