Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shankar Chandravanshi @ Shankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Shankar Chandravanshi, the appellant, had filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. The Special Public Prosecutor for the State noted that this was the second such application. The appellant's counsel did not contest this observation and sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrata Verma granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant may withdraw the appeal at this stage of the proceedings

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of appeal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.380 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2024 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Shankar Chandravanshi @ Shankar Kumar S/O Manoj Chandravanshi
                  Resident Of Mohalla- Purvi Lohanipur, P.s.- Kadamkuan, Dist.- Patna.
                                                                           ... ... Appellant/s
                                                   Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar
            2.     Lalti Devi W/O Krishna Chowdhary Resident Of Mohalla- Purvi Lohanipur,
                   P.s.- Kadamkuan, Dist.- Patna.
                                                                       ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Appellant/s    :       Mr. Amaresh Kumar
                  For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Binay Krishna
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    24-04-2026                 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned

                    Special PP for the State, Mr. Binay Krishna.

                                2. The learned Special PP, at the outset, submits that

                    this is the second anticipatory bail application of the appellant.

                                3. The learned counsel for the appellant does not

                    dispute the said submission of the learned Special PP and seeks

                    permission to withdraw the appeal.

                                4. Permission is accorded.

                                5. Accordingly,        the    appeal      is    dismissed         as

                    withdrawn.



                                                        (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.