Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sikandar Sah @ Mohammad Sikandar SahversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Summary

The appellant Sikandar Sah filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.73 of 2014 before the Patna High Court. Counsel for the appellant, Mr. Ramanand Poddar, appeared on behalf of his sister, Advocate‑On‑Record Ms. Sarita Bajaj, who was unwell, and Mr. Rudra Pratap Singh was appointed as Amicus Curiae due to earlier non‑appearance. The State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Abhay Kumar, an APP. The matter was heard at length on 24‑03‑2026, and the Court reserved its judgment.

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • amicus curiae
  • representation

Judgment

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                       CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.73 of 2014
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2009 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur
                     ======================================================
                     Sikandar Sah @ Mohammad Sikandar Sah
                                                                  ... ... Appellant/s
                                                   Versus
                     The State Of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Respondent/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Appellant/s     :       Mr.Ramanand Poddar, Advocate
                                                     Mr.Rudra Pratap Singh, Amicus Curiae
                     For the Respondent/s    :       Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                           ORAL ORDER

7       24-03-2026                  Mr. Rudra Pratap Singh, learned counsel, was ap-

                       pointed as the Amicus Curiae in this appeal as no one had ap-

                       peared on behalf of the appellant on several dates.

                                    2. Today (i.e. on 24.03.2026), Mr. Ramanand Poddar,

                       learned counsel informs this Court that the Advocate-On-

                       Record, Ms. Sarita Bajaj is his sister, she is not well and she has

                       requested him to appear in the present appeal on her behalf.

                                    3. Heard Mr. Ramanand Poddar, learned counsel and

                       Mr. Rudra Pratap Singh, learned Amicus Curiae appearing on

                       behalf of the appellant and Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned APP for

                       the State.

                                    4. Today, the appeal was heard in length.

                                    5. The judgment is kept reserved.



                                                 (Purnendu Singh, J)
chn/-
U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.