Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RUPESH YADAV@RUPESH KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that permission may be granted to withdraw an anticipatory bail application, resulting in its dismissal.

Summary

Rupesh Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel, Mr. Dilip Kumar, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could be withdrawn post-arrest. Justice Satyavrat Verma granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the applicant has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10007 of 2024
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2023 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur
                  ======================================================
                  Rupesh Yadav@Rupesh Kumar Yadav S/O Late Pulkit Yadav R/O Vill-Latra,
                  Ps-Gopalpur, Dist-Bhagalpur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Dilip Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Bishweshwar Ram
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    28-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.