Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjit RajwanshiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the charges under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Summary

The petitioners, Ranjit Rajwanshi and Upendra Rajwanshi, were arrested on 30 November 2025 after police recovered 98 litres of country‑made liquor from three sacks in an open area. They were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioners contended that they had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the recovery was made from a public place, and that no incriminating material linked them to the contraband. They also highlighted the lack of compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and pointed out that one petitioner had no prior criminal record while the other had only one antecedent. The State opposed the bail application, arguing the seriousness of the offence. After considering the facts, the duration of custody, and the arguments raised, the Court decided to grant bail. Each petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties of the same amount each.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under the circumstances of the case involving alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the non‑compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, affects the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • liquor seizure
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10016 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-980 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ranjit Rajwanshi S/o Late Radhe Ram Rajwanshi R/o Village- Jaishin
                  Bigha, PS- Muffasil, Dist.- Nawada
           2.    Upendra Rajwanshi S/o Late Ram Chandra Rajwanshi R/o vill - Bhaur, P.S.-
                 Rajauli, Distt.- Nawada

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Bishweshwar Ram, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Excise

                   Nawada P.S. Case No. 980 of 2025, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 98 liters of

                   country made liquor was recovered from three sacks. Petitioners

                   were arrest on the spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10016 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have

                     got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned

                     counsel for the petitioners further submitted that the recovery

                     has been made from mountain, which is an open place and is

                     accessible to public at large. The petitioners are in custody since

                     30.11.2025. Petitioner No.1 has no criminal antecedent, whereas

                     petitioner No.2 has one criminal antecedent. There is no

                     compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                     Sanhita, 2023.

                                  5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

                     petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

                                  7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with

                     two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Excise Nawada P.S.

                     Case No. 980 of 2025.


                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.