Created by Fuzzy Cloud

R P MISHRA

2310 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

Sri Nath JhaversusRajeshwar Singh

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The appellants, Sri Nath Jha and Rita Jha, filed First Appeal No.77 of 2019 before the Patna High Court. The court had earlier ordered them to rectify procedural defects, specifically to pay a deficit court fee of Rs.49,950, and granted them multiple extensions to do so. Despite these extensions, …

Umesh SinghversusSmt. Gunja Devi

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Umesh Singh and Dinesh Singh filed a first appeal (No.67 of 2022) before the Patna High Court against six respondents. No counsel appeared for either side, and the parties remained absent throughout the proceedings. The court had earlier, on 6 February 2026, granted the appellants six weeks to …

Abhishek KumarversusAwadhesh Kumar Mahto

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, a group of individuals, filed an application before the Patna High Court which was later found to be filed under an incorrect provision. They sought the Court’s permission to withdraw that application and to file a fresh one, also requesting condonation of the delay incurred. The …

Tahira PraveenversusNaheed

WITHDRAWN

The appellants filed an appeal against a civil suit valued at Rs. 2,60,000. An amendment to Section 21 of the Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts (Bihar Amendment) Act, 2013, raised the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Judge to Rs. 10 lakh, making the appeal more appropriately filed before the …

Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anil Singh and Pawan Singh filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 2814 of 2024, which had been dismissed on 09‑02‑2026 for want of prosecution because their counsel failed to appear. The petitioners contended that the non‑appearance was not deliberate but resulted from …

Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a vigilance case and charged under Sections 316(5) and 308(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected, with the court allowing a fresh application after five months. The petitioner argued …

Bhola KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner Bhola Kumar filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 4392 of 2025, which had been rejected because the court's peremptory order dated 05.02.2026 requiring notice to Respondent No.2 was not complied with within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued that …

Uchita Nand Chaudhary @ Uchyita Nand ChaudharyversusSamira Devi

CONVERTED

Uchita Nand Chaudhary appealed the order of the 3rd Additional District Judge, Munger, which rejected his probate application (Probate Case No. 07 of 2017). The appellate court observed that the probate case had not been contested by any other party. Referring to earlier judgments (FA No. 633 of …

Baleshwar Prasad @ Baleshwar Prasad YadavversusYogendra Rai

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The appellants, a group of ten individuals from Habibpur, filed a first appeal (No.112 of 2024) against Yogendra Rai. No counsel appeared for either side on the scheduled hearing dates of 08-04-2026 and 15-04-2026. The court observed that the appellants had shown no interest in pursuing the matter. …

Krishan Kumar Thakur @ Krishna Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Krishan Kumar Thakur appealed against a criminal conviction before the Patna High Court (Criminal Appeal No. 282 of 2026). During the hearing, the appellant's counsel, Mr. Ravi Prakash, sought the court's permission to withdraw the present appeal and to file a fresh application before the …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Pankaj Kumar was arrested in May 2024 and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 302 (murder) and 120(B) (criminal conspiracy), as well as sections 3(1)(r) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court had denied his bail application, and the …

Vikki Kumar @ Vikki YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Vikki Kumar (appellant) filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.548 of 2026 before the Patna High Court challenging the findings of the trial court in PS Mohanpur, Gaya. The appellant, through counsel Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal and instead move an …

Vidyapati SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vidyapati Sah, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court had earlier rejected regular bail on 24 July 2025, citing the seriousness of the offence and the petitioner’s involvement, and directed the …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunny Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and has been in judicial custody since 12‑08‑2024. He filed a second application for regular bail after an earlier denial. The trial report showed that only two of six …

Muskan Alam @ Muskan Mudsbin @ Muskan MudassirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Muskan Alam, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Madhuban Case No. 260 of 2024) under Sections 302, 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in judicial custody since 24 March 2025 and had previously been denied bail. The petitioner argued that his continued …

Tej Bahadur @ TejbahadurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Tej Bahadur, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c), 21(b), 21(c) and 22(c) of the Indian Penal Code relating to contraband beyond commercial quantity and an embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. This was his second bail application after an earlier …

Sambhu Prasad Singh @ Shambhu Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sambhu Prasad Singh, was arrested in August 2022 in connection with a 2015 case alleging offences under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail for the third time after two earlier applications were rejected by the Patna High Court. The petitioner …

ANIKEL MISHRA @ ANIKET MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISMISSED

The appellants appealed against the order of the Special Judge rejecting their bail applications in a case involving alleged sexual assault and theft under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellants attempted to sexually assault the informant and …

Krishna PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Krishna Paswan, originally respondent No.6 in a civil writ case, filed a review application (Civil Review No.338 of 2024) challenging the order dated 26‑09‑2024 which had set aside earlier orders of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms) and the Circle Officer and remanded the matter for a fresh …

Umesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Umesh Sahani appealed against the denial of bail in a case involving charges of murder, evidence tampering, and robbery under Sections 302, 201, 392 and 34 of the IPC, as well as provisions of the SC/ST Act. He had been in judicial custody since September 2022, and his earlier bail application was …

Bindeshwari RaiversusBebi Devi

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Bindeshwari Rai, filed a first appeal before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 9 April 2026, counsel for the appellant sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court considered whether such permission could be granted under procedural law. Justice Rudra …

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Pramod KumarversusSanjay Singh

CONVERTED

The appellants Rohit Kumar Singh and others filed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against an order dated 26‑08‑2019 of the Additional District Judge, Gaya, which had allowed a probate case ex‑parte. The order was not contested by the opposite party. The High Court, …

Tara SinghversusAmarnath Ray

CONVERTED

The appellant filed a first appeal against a judgment dated 03‑04‑2024 of the Additional District Judge‑II, Rohtas, which had allowed a petition in Probate Case No. 34 of 2020. The court examined the record and noted an earlier order dated 19‑02‑2024 in FA No. 39 of 2022 directing that the appeal be …

Ranju DeviversusSajnai Devi

CONVERTED

Ranju Devi appealed against the District Judge's order dismissing her probate suit as time‑barred at the admission stage. The High Court examined the appeal and noted that the lower court had not entertained the case on merits. Referring to a prior order in FA No. 39 of 2022, the Court directed that …

Ram Prasad Rai alias Prasad RaiversusMahesh Rai

CONVERTED

The appellant Ram Prasad Rai filed a first appeal against a probate judgment dated 28‑04‑2023, which had been decided ex‑parte. The lower court had allowed the probate, and the appeal was not contested. The High Court, noting an earlier order dated 19‑02‑2024 in FA No. 39 of 2022, directed that the …

Sunita SinghversusAjay Kumar Singh

CONVERTED

The appellant Sunita Singh filed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against an order dated 07‑06‑2024 of the Additional District Judge, Bhagalpur, which dismissed her probate application. The lower court had treated the matter as non‑contentious, with no objections from the …

NaheedversusSajid Shams

WITHDRAWN

The appellants filed a first appeal (No.159 of 2025) against a civil suit valued at Rs.2,60,000. During the pendency of the appeal, Section 21 of the Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts (Bihar Amendment) Act, 2013 was amended, raising the pecuniary jurisdiction so that appeals from suits up to Rs.10 …

Gulten SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gulten Sah, who is accused under IPC sections 342, 344, 376 and 504 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. An earlier order on 17‑02‑2025 had rejected regular bail, citing the gravity of the offences and the victim’s …

Santu KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Santu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a rape case (PS Case No. 395 of 2024) under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and has been in judicial custody since September 20, 2024. He filed a bail petition, arguing that he has been detained without justification. The …

Ganesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ganesh Kumar was charged under Sections 363, 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for offences arising from a case registered in Gopalpur Police Station. He has been in judicial custody since 31 March 2024 and filed a third bail application, having previously been denied bail on merit. The …

Sujit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Yadav, was charged with offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 and later 302. He applied for bail after being in judicial custody since 5 December 2023, claiming no prior criminal record. An earlier bail order rejected his regular bail but allowed a fresh …

Dilip PaswanversusThe Union of India Through Narcotics Control Bureau

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dilip Paswan, was arrested in 2021 for alleged possession of a large quantity of ganja under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. He applied for regular bail, but the Patna High Court had earlier rejected the bail twice, invoking the embargo provision of Section …

Bharat Prasad Singh @ Bharat Kumar Singh @ Bharat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bharat Prasad Singh, charged under IPC sections 324, 302, 120B, 34 and Arms Act section 27, applied for bail after being in custody since 16‑11‑2024. An earlier bail application was rejected, but the petitioner argued that only charge‑framing has occurred, no witnesses have been examined, and the …

Mukul Kumar @ Subham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Mukul Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 360 of 2024) for alleged offences under Sections 281, 125 and 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Patna High Court had earlier rejected his regular bail on 28 July 2025. On the present application, the court noted …

Tinku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Tinku Kumar, was charged under Sections 366A, 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged rape offences. He applied for bail for the third time, arguing that the trial had only reached the stage of charge framing with no witness examination and that he had been in judicial …

Bhollu MiyanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bhollu Miyan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 65(2), 351(2), 61(2), 191(2), 249(A) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He had earlier been denied regular bail after the court considered the victim's statement …

Ram Niranjan Kumar @ Mangal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ram Niranjan Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 18 February 2025 and this is his second application for regular bail after the court rejected his …

Firoj @ Md. FirojversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Firoj, sought regular bail in a case under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after being in judicial custody since 18 November 2024. His earlier bail application was rejected, but he argued that the trial was delayed, with only two of five charge‑sheeted witnesses …

Sajid Tyagi @ SajidversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sajid Tyagi, applied for regular bail in a case under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to alleged looted goods. He had been in judicial custody since 18 November 2024 and his earlier bail plea was rejected. Counsel argued that the prolonged pre‑trial …

Md. MahboobversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Mahboob, was arrested in September 2024 in connection with a case under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, a serious offence. He applied for regular bail, having been in judicial custody for over six months, and argued that the charge‑sheet had been filed and no …

Shankar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shankar Sharma was arrested on 7 November 2024 in connection with Session Trial Case No. 51 of 2025 for offences under Sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 109, 352, 3(5) and later Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner had previously applied for regular bail, which was rejected …

JITU YADAV @ JITENDRA KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jitu Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected, with the court directing a re‑application after six months. The petitioner, in …

Raju MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raju Mukhiya was charged under the Arms Act, NDPS Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for possession of two loaded pistols and 20 bottles of cough syrup. He had previously been granted bail, which was cancelled after he was declared an absconder and imprisoned in another case. The …

Sushil Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Yadav, was arrested in May 2025 in connection with a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and has been in judicial custody since then. He filed a second bail application after an earlier bail plea was rejected, arguing that his prolonged …

Rajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rajan Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(i)(ii) of the IT Act, 2000. He has been in judicial custody since 7 January 2025 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that …

Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Monu Kumar, sought modification of a bail condition that required one of his bailors to be a close family member. He argued that due to an inter‑caste marriage he was not receiving support from his family, making compliance impossible and resulting in continued detention. The Court …

Randheer Kumar @ Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Randheer Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 10 February 2025 and his charge was framed on 23 February 2026, with no witnesses examined. The petitioner …

Om Prakash Sah @ Om Prakash Shah @ Om Parkash SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Sah, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 10.4 kg of ganja from a tempo, alleged under Sections 80(c), 20(B)(ii) and 29 of the NDPS Act. He claimed false implication, having no prior criminal record, no contraband in his possession, and argued that the seized …

Rajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple IPC offences including assault, grievous hurt, attempt to murder and murder (Section 302). He applied for bail, having been in judicial custody since 5 December 2023. The High Court had earlier rejected …

Devnath KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Devnath Kumar, was charged under Sections 137, 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act in a case registered as Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 446 of 2024. He applied for regular bail after the charge was framed; an earlier bail application had …

Sajjan Prasad JiwarjikaversusShital Prasad Jiwarjika

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Sajjan Prasad Jiwarjika, filed a first appeal (No.94 of 2024) in the Patna High Court against a decree of the learned District Judge, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, with the suit valued at Rs.2,50,000. The appellant’s counsel argued that, following the amendment to Section 21 of the Bengal, …

Most. Meena DeviversusSmt. Chanda Devi

CONVERTED

The appellants filed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against a probate judgment dated 29‑01‑2024 that had allowed the probate case. The High Court observed that the probate matter was not contentious and, in view of an earlier order dated 19‑02‑2024 in FA No. 39 of 2022, …

Md. Jalil @ MunniversusSagira Begum

CONVERTED

The appellant, Md. Jalil @ Munni, filed a first appeal under section 299 of the Indian Succession Act challenging the order dated 30.10.2024 of the District and Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, which had rejected his probate application. The lower court had treated the matter as …

Savitri DeviversusRenu Devi

CONVERTED

In First Appeal No. 57 of 2024, Savitri Devi appealed against Renu Devi. The High Court examined the certified copy of the impugned order dated 18‑08‑2024 from the probate case, noting that the probate matter had been finally disposed on merit with no contentious proceedings. The Court observed that …

Smt. Sujata Verma @ Sujata VarmaversusDinesh Kumar

CONVERTED

The appellant, Smt. Sujata Verma, filed a memo of appeal against an order dated 12 March 2025 in a partition suit, wherein the trial court allowed an application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC and directed the plaint to be presented before a court with proper territorial jurisdiction. The High …

Jugal Kishore VermaversusPradeep Poddar

DISPOSED

The appellant, Jugal Kishore Verma, filed a first appeal (No.220 of 2025) against the Poddar family, valued at Rs.2 lakh. The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal from the Patna High Court and re‑file it before the Munger District Judge, citing the amendment to Section 21 of the …

Inderdeo BarhiversusRaghunath Barhi,

ABATED

The appellants Inderdeo Barhi and Bishundeo Barhi, who were parties to First Appeal No.263 of 1980, died during the pendency of the appeal. Substitution and limitation petitions were filed on their behalf, but the petitions were not pressed because the counsel failed to appear, leading to their …

CHANDRA SHEKHAR MISHRA andANR.versusCHANDRADIP MAHTO and ANR

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

An appeal (First Appeal No.751 of 1980) was filed before the Patna High Court by Chandra Shekhar Mishra and another against Chandradip Mahto and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of either party at the hearing dated 25-03-2026. The court noted that even on the previous hearing dated 08-05-2023, …

Ajay Kumar,versusSri Ravindra Kumar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants Ajay Kumar and Sarwan Kumar filed a first appeal before the Patna High Court against respondents including Ravindra Kumar, Puspalata Prasad, Vijay Kumar and Satish Kumar. During the hearing on 23-03-2026, counsel for the appellants sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. …

Ram Chandra YadavversusRanveer Kumar

CONVERTED

Ram Chandra Yadav and Abhinandan Yadav appealed against Ranveer Kumar and others. The appellants sought the Court’s permission to convert the pending First Appeal No. 16 of 2026 into a Miscellaneous Appeal, relying on a prior judgment dated 19 February 2024 in First Appeal No. 39 of 2022. Justice …

Ramjee PandeyversusLakshman Pandey,

WITHDRAWN

Ramjee Pandey filed a first appeal (No.9 of 2023) before the Patna High Court challenging a decree involving his relatives Lakshman Pandey, Bharat Pandey and others. The appellant, through counsel Mr. Uday Kumar and Mr. Rahul Kumar, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the appeal. The sole …

Kiran DeviversusEstate of Late Shayam Narayan Puri

CONVERTED

The appellants, Kiran Devi and Deepika, daughters of the late Sachchidanand Puri, filed a first appeal (No.29 of 2023) challenging a decree concerning the estate of the late Shayam Narayan Puri. The respondents were the estate and several heirs of the deceased. The appellants sought the Court's …

Saroj DeviversusAraji Devi

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Saroj Devi, sought the Court's permission to withdraw her pending application and to file a fresh one under the correct provision, also requesting condonation of any delay in filing the new application. The Court considered whether such permission could be granted and whether any …

Rajeev Kumar PatelversusAdhula Devi

DISPOSED

The appellants, Rajeev Kumar Patel and Sanjeev Kumar, appealed a decree of a civil suit valued at Rs.3 lakhs before the Patna High Court. The learned counsel argued that an amendment to Section 21 of the Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Court Act, 1887 now limits appeals of suits valued below Rs.10 …

Anant Singh @ Anant Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anant Singh was arrested in connection with a political rally incident where the deceased’s grandfather was allegedly assaulted and the deceased later died from blunt force injuries. The prosecution alleged that Singh fired at the victim’s heel and was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the …

Atul PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Atul Patel, was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and several provisions of the Arms Act for a murder and related offences. He applied for bail, having been in judicial custody since August 2023. The High Court had earlier rejected regular bail, directing the trial …

Gurudeo JhaversusDipak Kumar Singh, Additional Chief Secretary

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gurudeo Jha, filed a contempt petition seeking a rule of contempt against several government officials for allegedly disobeying a July 25, 2024 order of the Patna High Court in CWJC No.10971, which directed the disposal of his representation within three months of receipt of the …

Manoj Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar Sharma was arrested in March 2023 in connection with a dowry death case (IPC Section 304B) and has been in custody for three years. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that no witnesses had been examined, the trial was far from conclusion, and continued detention violated his …

Md. JasimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Jasim, was arrested on 5 August 2024 and charged under Sections 103(1) and 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for bail, which was previously rejected on 8 April 2025, with a direction to expedite the trial. A report showed that charges were framed on 10 …

Azizul Rahman @ Md. AzizulversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Azizul Rahman, sought bail in a case (S.Tr. No. 329 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 302 and 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Patna High Court had earlier rejected regular bail, directing the lower court to expedite the trial. After receiving a progress report showing …

Kumod Kumar Sah @ Ganga Sah @ Gunjan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kumod Kumar Sah was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and has been in custody since 1 April 2025. A prior application for regular bail was rejected, and this was the second attempt for bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued that …

Nikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nikesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected, but the petitioner filed a second bail application, arguing that only two of eight prosecution …

Satya Narayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Satya Narayan Singh filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No.72776 of 2025 after a peremptory order dated 14‑10‑2025 had rejected the proceeding for failure to issue a notice to the second opposite party, Niranjan Pandey, within the time fixed by the court. The …

Md. Mustak @ Md. Mustaq @ Md. MustakhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Mustak, was arrested in connection with a case (PS Case No. 89 of 2024) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, grievous hurt, and attempt to murder. He has been in judicial custody since 13 September 2024 and previously applied for regular …

Rupesh Mehta @ Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Rupesh Mehta was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 307, 302, 394/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, but the High Court had earlier rejected regular bail, directing the trial court to expedite the trial. A subsequent …

Md. Sabbir @ Sabir @ Md. SaabbirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sabbir, was arrested in May 2025 on charges under Section 95 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 67, 67(A), 67(B) of the Information Technology Act and Sections 15(1) and 15(2) of the POCSO Act. He had been in judicial custody since 5 May 2025 and his earlier …

Jhapta Singh @ Jhaptu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jhapta Singh, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302 and 102(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 12 May 2024 and previously sought regular bail, which was denied by the Patna High Court on the …

Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a former IT supervisor, was arrested in September 2024 in connection with a 2017 case alleging offences under IPC sections 467, 468, 406, 409, 470 and 471. He applied for regular bail; the court had earlier denied bail in July 2025, allowing a re‑application after six months. Counsel …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sonu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and has been in judicial custody since 18 November 2024. He filed a second bail application after an earlier denial, arguing that the trial is delayed, only two of five charge‑sheeted …

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Rohit KumarversusThe state of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 317(3) and 317(5) later added. He has been in judicial custody since 25 July 2024 without charge framing or trial progress, and his earlier bail application …

Ashraf Sheikh @ Araraf SheikhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ashraf Sheikh was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with additional charges under Sections 103, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) later added. He applied for regular bail, having been in judicial custody since September 2024, and argued that …

Veer Bahadur SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Veer Bahadur Singh, arrested in September 2024, is charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for regular bail after a prior bail application was rejected. Counsel argued that his continued pre‑trial detention violates Article 21 of the Constitution, especially …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He had been in judicial custody since 18 November 2024 and his earlier bail plea was rejected. The petitioner argued that his continued detention, despite charge framing and witness …

Sunil BindversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sunil Bind was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) and has been in judicial custody since June 5, 2024. He filed a second bail application after an earlier denial, arguing lack of criminal antecedents and that the prosecution had already filed an application under CrPC …

Sanjeev Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petition was filed by Sanjeev Kumar Singh seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against Opposite Party No. 4 for willful disobedience of an order dated 23‑09‑2024 in C.W.J.C. No. 14435/2024, later modified on 19‑03‑2025. The petitioner alleged that the opposite party failed to comply with …

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants, Sunil Kumar and Rama Shankar Kumar, were convicted under IPC sections 302, 120B, 201, 34 and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(v) and were denied bail by the Special Judge. They appealed to the Patna High Court, arguing that they had been in judicial custody for over two and a half years …

Rocky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rocky Kumar was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case registered as P.S. No. 372 of 2024. The Exclusive Special Judge denied his bail application, and the appellant filed a second regular bail appeal …

Neelu Kumar @ Nilu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neelu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 24‑Oct‑2024 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that …

Bhaskar Kumar Suman @ GoluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhaskar Kumar Suman, was charged under Sections 111 and 317(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 8(c) and 21(c) of the NDPS Act. An earlier bail application was rejected on the ground of recovery of contraband beyond commercial quantity. In the present application, …

Tiger Yadav @ Taigar Yadav @ Tiger YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Tiger Yadav was arrested in connection with a case filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST Act and has been in custody since 12 January 2025 without any trial progress. The appellant sought regular bail, arguing that continued pre‑trial detention violated his …

Jitendra Ram @ Jitendra Kumar Ram @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought regular bail in a criminal case (PS Khanpur Case No.269 of 2022) for offences under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court had earlier rejected bail, allowing a fresh application after six months. On the present application, the court …

Usha Devi @ UshaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Usha Devi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that she might be arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 210 litres of liquor were seized, including 15 litres from her hut. She contended that her name was implicated …

Aakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Aakash Kumar and Aaditya Kumar, were arrested on 02‑02‑2026 after 83.640 litres of liquor was recovered from a car in a Buxar Excise case. They applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of incriminating material in their possession, and that they were merely a driver and passenger …

Nand Kishore YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nand Kishore Yadav, was arrested in connection with a theft of electronic equipment from a government school, alleged under Sections 303(2) and 334 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name does not appear in the FIR and …

Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sunil Yadav and Mohan Yadav, were arrested in connection with a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 60.060 litres of liquor. They contended that they were neither owners nor drivers of the vehicle from which the liquor was seized, that no …

Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shanti Devi was arrested after 320 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered near her hut in Turkauliya, East Champaran. She applied for bail, contending that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the recovery was from an open public area, and that no incriminating material linked …

Ballabh Raj @ Ballab RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ballabh Raj, was arrested on 24 November 2025 in Amipur on suspicion of cheating through mobile phone scams involving call girl services and loan offers, and was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case is based on secret …

Babloo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Babloo Kumar, applied for bail in a case (Raxaul PS Case No. 526 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 11(2)(b) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that a police raid recovered a stolen motorcycle and that the petitioner …

Abhimanyu Kumar @ Body Guard @ Sonu @ MonuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of a country-made pistol, two live cartridges, and 13.15 kg of ganja, and was charged under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that no …

Md. Husen Rain @ M.D. Husaun @ Hasan RainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Husen Rain, feared arrest in an excise case (Benipatti Excise PS Case No. 236 of 2025) where 360 litres of liquor were seized from three motorcycles. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was the owner of one of the motorcycles involved in the seizure under Section 30(a) of …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, was arrested on 17 January 2026 after 5.250 liters of liquor were allegedly recovered from a jute bag in his possession during a raid by the Sadar Excise Police Station, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was …

Vinod MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vinod Mukhiya and Ram Prasad Mukhiya, were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant with a lathi and fatta, causing injuries, disrobing her, and snatching her mangalsutra on 10-12-2025. They contended that the …

Neha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Neha Kumari, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a police raid recovered four country‑made pistols and cartridges from a co‑accused, Kallu Kumar. The petitioner contended that no arms were found in her possession and that …

Naresh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Naresh Rai was arrested at Sadar Excise Thana, Saran after 41.76 litres of liquor were recovered from a tampoo, and was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He pleaded that he was merely a passenger, had no knowledge of the contraband, and that no …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sahiyara PS Case No. 205 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 200 litres of liquor were seized from a vehicle. He contended that his name was only disclosed by a co-accused, he does …

Md. SirajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Siraj, a driver of a Scorpio vehicle, was arrested on 10 January 2026 for alleged possession of 179.250 litres of liquor, contravening Sections 292 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a), 32, 41(i) & (ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The …

Dharmendra Kumar @ DhanoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Giriyak P.S. Case No. 384 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 1794.375 litres of liquor were recovered from a co‑accused’s store room. The petitioner argued that no liquor was …

Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, sought bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 216 litres of liquor recovered from his car. The prosecution alleged the liquor was in his vehicle, while the petitioner claimed he was unaware of the contents and …

Vinod @ Makae Ram @ Vinod Ram @ Makae @ Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vinod Kumar and Niiraj Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 80 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. They contended that they were merely passersby, not owners of the motorcycle, and that no …

Mohan Dhangad @ Mohan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Mohan Dhangad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Manjhauliya P.S. Case No. 187 of 2019) under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 30 litres of liquor were recovered from his house. The prosecution’s case is based on a confessional …

Gonu Rai @ Gonu RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gonu Rai, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 23,600 litres of liquor recovered from a jute sack. He claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was found in his conscious …

Pani Botal @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pani Botal, was arrested in connection with a case of assault and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, participated in a violent attack on the informant and his friend, including assaults with fists …

Nasir Quraishi @ Nashir QuraisiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nasir Quraishi, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault and related offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the FIR and charge sheet were omnibus and did not specifically allege any …

Alok Kumar @ Alok Kumar ThakurversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Alok Kumar, a driver, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 185.16 liters of liquor from a car, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he was not the owner of the vehicle, had no knowledge of the …

Sanjeev Kumar @ Mangal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 9.55 g of ‘smack’. He contended that the seized narcotic was below commercial quantity, no incriminating material was found on his person, and that he was …

Niteesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niteesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 617 of 2025) involving alleged seizure of 97.110 litres of liquor from his vehicle under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged his ownership of the vehicle and implicated him under …

Sarfaraz Khan @ Sarfraz KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Darbhanga, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2022, GR No. 2189 of 2022) involving alleged offences under IPC Sections 147 and 307 and Arms Act Section 27. The prosecution alleged that the accused surrounded an …

Rakesh Rai @ Jiddi Rai @ Tipu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Digha PS Case No. 16 of 2026) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 259.2 litres of liquor. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered from a vehicle, but the …

Abhijeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhijeet Kumar, was arrested on 30 January 2026 in connection with a case (Excise P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026) alleging possession of 500.220 litres of liquor on a bus, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution’s case is based …

MONU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Monu Kumar, applied for bail in a case (Singhaul P.S. Case No. 192 of 2025) involving alleged theft of an e‑rickshaw under Sections 310(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that a group of persons stole the e‑rickshaw, but the petitioner was not …

Nirad KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nirad Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act where 222 grams of brown sugar was seized, of which 20 grams was allegedly found on his person. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal …

Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 513 litres of liquor in a Bolero pick‑up. He claimed to be merely the driver and asserted that he had no knowledge of the goods, no …

Bhuteli YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bhuteli Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.858/2024) under Sections 8(c) and 21(a) of the NDPS Act where 3.4 kg of ganja was seized. He argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal record, no contraband was found in his possession, and the …

Sonu Kumar Bharti @ Sonu GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Bharti, was arrested for alleged possession of 14 grams of smack and 19 grams of ganja under Sections 8(c), 21(B), 8 and 20(B)(II)(A) of the NDPS Act. He claimed innocence, asserting that the contraband was planted and that no incriminating material was found in his …

Rajkumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajkumar Mandal, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Bath P.S. Case No. 120 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged forgery and wrongful identification in a sale deed. The prosecution …

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, feared arrest in a case (P.S. Case No. 190 of 2024) involving alleged theft and robbery under Section 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that four accused snatched a mobile phone, cash and a motorcycle from an informant, and the petitioner’s …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pankaj Kumar feared arrest in a case (Malsalami P.S. Case No. 610 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 1,000 litres of liquor were recovered near the Ganga river. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner claimed he was falsely …

Hari SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Hari Sah was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape under Sections 498‑A, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the alleged victim had a consensual relationship with another accused, Bittu Kumar, and that …

SADDAM HUSSAINversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saddam Hussain, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case alleging possession of child pornography, charged under Section 95 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 67, 67(A), 67(B) of the IT Act and Sections 15(1) and 15(2) of the POCSO Act. Police intercepted a …

Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, a lower‑division clerk at Bihar State Seeds Corporation, was charged under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged shortage of seed quantity and excess payment to farmers. He claims the discrepancy arose from a mechanical or human error in data entry, …

Akal @ Shakal Deo PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akal @ Shakal Deo Prasad, sought bail in a murder case (Tekari P.S. Case No. 93 of 1997) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 291, 201 and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the original FIR, …

Mahadev Kumar @ Maahdev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahadev Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he enticed a minor girl, the informant’s daughter, and is charged under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 87 and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended that the allegations are vague, that the victim voluntarily …

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar SrivastavaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava, was arrested in connection with a case involving the sale of spurious liquor that allegedly caused four deaths. He faced charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (272, 273, 328, 307, 304, 120/34) and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act …

Ranjit PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Patel, applied for bail in a case where he is accused of kidnapping a minor girl with the intention of marrying her, under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner abducted the informant’s daughter, while …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging rape, wrongful restraint, hurt, insult and common intention under Sections 376, 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the IPC, and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner sought bail after an earlier anticipatory bail application had been …

Sajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sajan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving the illegal possession of 37.14 litres of liquor, a gas cylinder, regulator, 26 live cartridges and a country‑made pistol recovered from his house. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Hisua PS No. 455 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 110.125 litres of liquor were recovered. He contended that he was falsely implicated based on secret information, had no criminal antecedent, …

Rishi Sharma @ Rishi Raj @ Rishiraj SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rishi Sharma, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Shahkund P.S. Case No. 189 of 2022) alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his confession to police held no evidentiary value. The …

Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Brajesh Kumar and Sittu Kumar were arrested in connection with a case under Sections 223(2), 292 and 3/5 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a and 27 of the Arms Act after a viral Facebook video allegedly showed them holding country‑made pistols. The petitioners argued that they …

Ravish Kumar @ Manish Kumar @ Tushi @ Tushi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravish Kumar, applied for bail in a case (Pandarak P.S. Case No. 185 of 2025) filed under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging involvement in a robbery and theft. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded money, seized a mobile phone and cash from the …

Nandu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nandu Yadav and Manoj Yadav, applied for bail in a case (Bahera P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 103, 123 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to be murder of the informant's wife. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with …

Chulbul Pandey @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chulbul Pandey (alias Manish Kumar), was implicated in a case (PS. Case No. 507 of 2024) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have made threatening calls demanding ransom and participated in indiscriminate …

Lalan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalan Kumar, feared arrest in a case (PS Dalsingsarai Case No. 521 of 2025) where 453.9 liters of liquor were seized from two motorcycles, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the scene, had no …

Monu Ram @ Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Monu Ram, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case (Gourichak PS Case No. 670 of 2025) alleging that 100 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle belonging to a co-accused. He contended that he neither owned the vehicle nor had any knowledge of the liquor, asserting …

Baidhyanath Rai @ Sadhu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Baidhyanath Rai sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 275 litres of liquor, of which 20 litres were allegedly recovered from his premises, under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that his name was …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, feared arrest in a case involving the recovery of 460.515 litres of liquor from a vacant land, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution’s case is based on the recovery of the liquor, while the petitioner claims he was falsely …

Shashi Shekhar @ ChhoteyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shashi Shekhar, feared arrest in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) where the prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, looted gold ornaments, a mobile phone and threatened the informant with a pistol. The police recovered a motorcycle and some gold ornaments from the house …

Chhotelal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chhotelal Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 261/2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly discarding 7.8 litres of country-made liquor. The prosecution alleged that 20 litres of liquor were recovered from three …

Sablu Kumar @ BabluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sablu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case (Hisua P.S. Case No. 734 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 145 litres of liquor from a tempo. The prosecution’s case rests on a confessional statement of …

Kamlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Kamlesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where 564 litres of liquor were seized from his vehicle, alleged to violate Sections 30(a), 32, 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 336(3), 340(2), 338 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended …

Chandan Kumar @ ChandanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, feared arrest in a case (PS No. 91 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 221.760 litres of liquor were recovered from a bus. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the bus and that his name was implicated …

Kaushal Kumar @ BajrangiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case where 240 litres of liquor were seized from a car under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he was neither the owner nor driver of the vehicle and was not present at the scene, asserting that his name was …

Ranjit MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where 810 litres of liquor were seized and offences under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act were alleged. The prosecution’s case …

Pappu Kumar Yadav @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a Mahila Police Station case alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354(B), and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner harassed and tortured …

Om Prakash SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Sahani, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Banjariya PS Case No. 586 of 2025) involving alleged contravention of Sections 30(a), 329(2) and 41(1)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 466.02 litres of liquor were recovered from a vehicle. He claimed he was …

Arfin Shahbaz @ Md Shahbaz AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arfin Shahbaz, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 436 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 202.860 litres of liquor were recovered from a tractor he owned. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no …

Gaurav Kumar @ Kumar GauravversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 330.120 litres of liquor were seized from a pick‑up vehicle. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner contended that his name was …

Ajit SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner Ajit Sah feared arrest in a case (PS No.325/2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 192.54 litres of liquor were seized from a vehicle. He contended that he was falsely implicated, having no ownership of the vehicle involved, no …

Sangita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sangita Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Janta Bazar PS Case No. 326 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 5 litres of liquor was recovered from an open area behind her house. She contended that her name was supplied by a …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, feared arrest in an excise case where 1,125 litres of liquor were seized from a truck, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the truck and that his name was …

Dhananjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Amba PS No. 134 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 400 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles. The prosecution alleged his involvement as the owner of one …

Md. Hidayat Ansari @ Md. Hiyat AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Hidayat Ansari, feared arrest in a case where 756 litres of liquor were seized from a Scorpio car registered in his name. He was charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner …

Raj Kumar @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Raj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a NDNDPS case (Sections 8(c), 21(c), 25 and 29) relating to the recovery of 723.67 grams of brown sugar from co‑accused Juli @ Mahi. The petitioner argued that no contraband was recovered from his possession, his …

Ram Bharosh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that they were falsely implicated in the assault and subsequent death of an informant's husband. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in the …

Naresh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case (Shahpur Patory PS Case No. 46 of 2025) where they were alleged to have assaulted an informant’s husband and Vashisht Singh, leading to the husband’s death. The FIR named eight accused, including the petitioners, and invoked several sections of the …

Pappu Kumar @ Ashutosh KumarversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, three individuals from Khagaria district, filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna arising from a criminal miscellaneous case. They later sought the Court's permission to withdraw this application. The Court considered whether a petitioner's request to …

Munna Singh @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Munna Singh was charged with the brutal assault and murder of the informant's father under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Special Judge denied his bail application, prompting an appeal …

Sriram MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, relatives of a deceased woman, feared arrest in a dowry‑death case (Tikkapatti P.S. Case No. 130 of 2023) where the deceased was allegedly killed by her husband and his family for non‑payment of dowry. The informant alleged that the husband and his relatives demanded Rs. 3,00,000 …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Akhilesh Kumar was arrested in connection with the murder of the informant's father, charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court denied his bail application, relying on the charge sheet and a confessional …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Nitish Kumar, was charged with murder, illegal possession of arms and an offence under the SC/ST Act in Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 503 of 2025. The Special Judge denied his bail application, prompting an appeal to the Patna High Court. The appellant's counsel argued that he was falsely …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Nitish Kumar, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge SC/ST Civil Court, Patna, which rejected his bail application in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(i)(r)(s)(w) of the …

Santosh RishiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Rishi was charged with extortion, assault, theft and property damage arising from a dispute over allotted government land, and alleged offences under the SC/ST Act. The appellant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the charge‑sheet was vague, and that no caste name was used …

Santosh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Santosh Mahto and Umesh Sah filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioners, represented by Advocate Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the pending application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the request for …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nitish Kumar and Rajesh Kumar were arrested after police intercepted a vehicle and recovered 400 grams of cannabis, cash and other items, and were charged under Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 22 of the NDPS Act. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record and …

Golden KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Golden Kumar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 897.84 liters of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was found in his possession, he was …

Girdhari MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Girdhari Mahto, was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (PS Revilganj Case No. 44 of 2025) under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleges that he, along with family members, tortured and killed the deceased for dowry demands. …

Dilip Kumar @ DilipversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dilip Kumar and Amit Kumar, were charged under Section 140(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly threatening a rickshaw driver and demanding a ransom of Rs.1,00,000. They contended that the allegations were vague, no specific overt act was ascribed to them, and no …

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(3), 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act, after police recovered a pistol, cartridges, phones and motorcycles. The petitioner claimed he was …

Agindeo Ram @ Agnideo RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Agindeo Ram, was arrested in connection with a case involving arson and firing at three company vehicles, alleged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 427, 436 and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution’s case is that unknown miscreants committed the offences, while the petitioner …

Pranjal Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pranjal Kumar Patel was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 21(c), 23(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of contraband beyond commercial quantity. He has been in judicial custody since 9 April 2025 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner …

Md. Gaji AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Gaji Ali and Md. Bismillah Ali, were arrested in connection with a raid that uncovered illegal firearms at a co-accused's residence, leading to charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. They contended that no incriminating material was found on them, they …

Surendra Mahto @ Suresh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Surendra Mahto was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his residence and an alleged assault on police officers by co‑accused. He faces multiple IPC charges (sections 147, 148, 149, 224, 225, 341, 323, 353, 307, 332, 333, 504, 506) and …

Karan Kumar @ Karan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Karan Kumar was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly assaulting a deceased person with a knife. He applied for regular bail, having been in judicial custody since 16 September 2024, and this was his second bail application after an earlier …

Sukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sukesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged seizure of illegal liquor, pistols, and cartridges from a boat, and is charged under Sections 109(1), 132, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. …

Sonu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sonu Kumar Gupta was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 309(6) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected, and the petitioner has been in custody since 4 August 2024. The petitioner’s …

Jamuna Chouhan @ Yamuna ChouhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jamuna Chouhan filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 4820 of 2025, which had been rejected because the court’s order dated 16.12.2025 requiring notice to the second opposite party was not complied with within the prescribed time. The petitioner …

Jaypal Kumar @ Jaypal ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jaypal Kumar, filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 199 of 2025, which had been rejected because the court's order dated 21-11-2025 requiring notice to the second opposite party was not complied with within the prescribed time. The petitioner argued …

Krishna Kumar @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was charged under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged firing offences. He has been in judicial custody since 15 July 2024 and sought regular bail, having previously been denied bail by the same …

Firoz Khan @ SonuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Firoz Khan was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, where 8.250 kg of ganja and 6.200 kg of bhang were seized. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that no incriminating material was found on his person and that the seized quantity was below the …

Madan NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Madan Nat was arrested in Bheldi police station case No. 329 of 2025 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 62 litres of liquor were recovered from a sack at a public place. He claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor, no incriminating material was …